i thought there was no other denominations in Catholic Church but what is this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bev17243
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The “Old” Catholic denominations split from the true Catholic Church based in Rome after the First Vatican Council. I believe the movement primarily consists of those who defy the notion of Papal Infallibility as set out in 1870. Anyone who officially labels himself “Old Catholic” is specifically denying membership in the Roman Church, which he will say has become corrupt. Old Catholics believe they have preserved the proper faith without any extremist elements (which we call Infallibility).

It can be extremely confusing… 😛
 
If they are not under the authority of the Pope, they ain’t Catholic. They’re catholic.

Many try to avoid answering the question or give really nice sounding, even complimentary lip service. But they ain’t Catholic.
i think i would agree with your statement
 
Old Catholics believe they have preserved the proper faith without any extremist elements (which we call Infallibility).
Sadly, they have not succeeded in preserving the Faith that was handed down to them. In addition to denying that the Pope can define dogma, protected from error by the Holy Spirit, at least some who go by the name “Old Catholic” will attempt to marry men to men and women to women. They also allow marriage for ordained priests and bishops, and for persons who are already married. They attempt to ordain women. And they regard the the Sacrament of Confession as optional. These are new practices and beliefs, adopted after they split from the Catholic Church and incompatible with the Catholic Faith.
 
If they are not under the authority of the Pope, they ain’t Catholic. They’re catholic.

Many try to avoid answering the question or give really nice sounding, even complimentary lip service. But they ain’t Catholic.
Supposedly they have valid Apostolic Succession.
 
Supposedly they have valid Apostolic Succession.
Yes, via the Union of Utrecht schism (which grew out of the old Jansenist heresy)

This is from the Catholic Encyclopedia (published 1907-1912), in the article on Jansenism:
…The conflict lasted a long time, during which the episcopal functions were not fulfilled. In 1723 the Chapter of Utrecht i.e. a group of seven or eight priests who assumed this name and quality in order to put an end to a precarious and Painful situation, elected, on its own authority, as archbishop of the same city, one of its members, Cornelius Steenhoven, who then held the office of vicar-general. This election was not canonical, and was not approved by the pope. Steenhoven nevertheless had the audacity to get himself consecrated by Varlet, a former missionary bishop and coadjutor Bishop of Babylon, who was at that time suspended, interdicted, and excommunicated. He thus consummated the schism, interdicted likewise and excommunicated, he died in 1725. Those who had elected him transferred their support to Barchman Wuitiers, who had recourse to the same consecrator. The unhappy Varlet lived long enough to administer the episcopal unction to two successors of Barchman, van der Croon and Meindarts. The sole survivor of this sorry line, Meindarts, ran the risk of seeing his dignity become extinct with himself. To prevent this, the Dioceses of Haarlem (1742) and Deventer (1757) were created, and became suffragans of Utrecht. But Rome always refused to ratify these outrageously irregular acts, invariably replying to the notification of each election with a declaration of nullification and a sentence of excommunication against those elected and their adherents. Yet, in spite of everything, the schismatical community of Utrecht has prolonged its existence until modern times. At present it numbers about 6000 members in the three united dioceses. It would scarcely be noticed if it had not, in the last century, made itself heard by protesting against Pius IX’s re-establishment of the Catholic hierarchy in Holland (1853), by declaring itself against the dogmas of the Immaculate Conception (1854) and Papal Infallibility (1870), and lastly, after the Vatican Council, in allying itself with the “Old Catholics”, whose first so-called bishop it consecrated.
newadvent.org/cathen/08285a.htm
 
If they are not under the authority of the Pope, they ain’t Catholic. They’re catholic.

Many try to avoid answering the question or give really nice sounding, even complimentary lip service. But they ain’t Catholic.
I agree. If they are not in union with the Magisterium, they are not Catholic.
 
I agree. If they are not in union with the Magisterium, they are not Catholic.
The problem is that the ROMAN Catholic Church does not have a copyright or trademark on the term “catholic”.:dts:

When I was a teenager, attending Lutheran Catechism, we were taught that the word “catholic” in the creed meant “universal”. :imsorry:
 
When I was a teenager, attending Lutheran Catechism, we were taught that the word “catholic” in the creed meant “universal”. :imsorry:
Yep, I remember that as well.

And, of course, that is what the word means. The Catechism of the Catholic Church says that the Church is catholic in two senses:

CCC said:
830 The word “catholic” means “universal,” in the sense of “according to the totality” or “in keeping with the whole.” the Church is catholic in a double sense: First, the Church is catholic because Christ is present in her.
831 Secondly, the Church is catholic because she has been sent out by Christ on a mission to the whole of the human race:310
vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P29.HTM

Of course, the Catholic Church further refines this to include only those communities which have preserved both the apostolic succession and the sacraments, and have remained in the communion of faith.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top