I was converted from Catholicism to Christ at the age of 19.

  • Thread starter Thread starter vichlopet
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It sure did…

2 Preach the word: be instant in season, out of season: reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine.

41 They say to him: He will bring those evil men to an evil end; and will let out his vineyard to other husbandmen, that shall render him the fruit in due season.

Perhaps I am out of season, I am bearing no fruit when He finds me, so He curses me and I die.

Afterwards…

…they came to Jerusalem…entered into the temple…And he taught, …

…Which when the chief priests and the scribes had heard, they sought how they might destroy him. For they feared him, because the whole multitude was in admiration at his doctrine. 19 And when evening was come, he went forth out of the city. 20 And when they passed by in the morning they saw the fig tree dried up from the roots.
So now there’s more than one account of what happened?

Early in the morning, as he was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, “May you never bear fruit again!” Immediately the tree withered.

When the disciples saw this, they were amazed. “How did the fig tree wither so quickly?” they asked.
Jesus replied, “I tell you the truth, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and it will be done. If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer.”

So first, the fig tree is noted, the following morning.
Now we have Matthew saying that this was discovered to be the
case, instantly. “Immediately…”

…he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, “May you never bear fruit again!” Immediately the tree withered.

Hungry? No figs [out of season].

So he curses the fig tree and it withers.
A fit of pique, on the part of purported Godhead?

reen12
 
A distinct difference is noted - with God, Who is One.

There the angel of the Lord appeared to him in flames of fire from within a bush. Moses saw that though the bush was on fire it did not burn up. So Moses thought, “I will go over and see this strange sight—why the bush does not burn up.” Exodus

…I have set life and death, blessing and curse, before you.
Therefore choose life so that you and your descendants may live.
Deuteronomy

Jesus claimed that he is life. Yet he was quick to destroy a
living thing.

Irritated? - that the fig tree did not produce figs…out of season,
when he was hungry?

So he destroys?

Then it is claimed that he was illustrating a point, about faith.
So he destroys a living thing, to make a point.

Far from the God Who said:

…choose life…

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a106/reen12/twotrees.jpg%between%

The burning bush was not destroyed by the flames. It was even
more a little bush, after God spoke from it. A considerable
contrast with the destructive behavior of Jesus.

reen12
 
And may our Good God quickly return to the Church of your youth, may he quickly restore in you all the years that have been taken away from you by not receiving the Sacraments of the Church.

God bless you on your journey. Actually, you would not be posting here if you were not coming home. One thing I have noticed is those who leave, alway desire to justify why they left. Sadly there is no justification for leaving - at some point we all must say yest to Jesus and take responcibility for our faith.

God loves you and so do we!
 
It just occured to me that I have never regreted my conversion. When I was saved, no one told me that I have to leave the Catholic religion, I simply believed that Jesus Christ paid for my sins with his blood and I called upon him to save me: just like the Philipian jailer in Acts 16:31. He asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved…” He did, and he was. To the saved believer, the thought of someone trying to administer God’s grace through some ritual is the highest form of idolatry there is. Jesus said, “it is finished”, not ‘it’s begun’.

I just hope that people will see that God’s grace is through faith in Christ and not in some man made rituals. May the Lord truly bless every one who is seeking to know him in truth.
What about the rich young man’s question to JESUS of how to get saved? After all he had followed all 10 Commandments perfectly. What was he to do to gain eternal salvation? DId JESUS say accept me as your savior and you are going to Heaven? No, he said sell all you have pick up your cross and follow me?
Also can you quote a Bible passage where it says you will go to Heaven by accepting JESUS as your savior? What about 1 Corinthians Chapter 12 where it talks about eating the BODY and drinking the BLOOD of Christ?
Paul said that we are Temples of the Holy Spirit. The Jewish Temples is where they had a liturgy which consisted of reading out of Scripture, and they had Sacrafices there. Tell me does your Baptist Church have Sacrafices? Or do you just talk about the Word of GOD?
Finally two last points. Where in the Bible does it say to go by Sacred Scripture alone? Second, if you take the Bible why don’t you follow Jesus’s command to drink my Blood and eat my Body?
God bless you
 
It just occured to me that I have never regreted my conversion. When I was saved, no one told me that I have to leave the Catholic religion, I simply believed that Jesus Christ paid for my sins with his blood and I called upon him to save me: just like the Philipian jailer in Acts 16:31. He asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved…” He did, and he was. To the saved believer, the thought of someone trying to administer God’s grace through some ritual is the highest form of idolatry there is. Jesus said, “it is finished”, not ‘it’s begun’.

I just hope that people will see that God’s grace is through faith in Christ and not in some man made rituals. May the Lord truly bless every one who is seeking to know him in truth.
Jesus Rejoices in the Father’s Will

In that same hour he rejoiced in the Holy Spirit and said, “I thank you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and understanding and revealed them to little children; yes, Father, for such was your gracious will. All things have been handed over to me by my Father, and no one knows who the Son is except the Father, or who the Father is except the Son and anyone to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.”

Luke 10
 
So now there’s more than one account of what happened?

Early in the morning, as he was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, “May you never bear fruit again!” Immediately the tree withered.

When the disciples saw this, they were amazed. “How did the fig tree wither so quickly?” they asked.
Jesus replied, “I tell you the truth, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and it will be done. If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer.”

So first, the fig tree is noted, the following morning.
Now we have Matthew saying that this was discovered to be the
case, instantly. “Immediately…”

…he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, “May you never bear fruit again!” Immediately the tree withered.

Hungry? No figs [out of season].

So he curses the fig tree and it withers.
A fit of pique, on the part of purported Godhead?

reen12
You have two accounts from two different people; the one who was present to see the tree wither the other who saw the tree withered the following morning. 🙂
So he curses the fig tree and it withers. [because it did not bear any fruit]
He curses the goats because they did not bear any fruit.

Then he shall say to them [goats] also that shall be on his left hand: Depart from me, you cursed, into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry, and you gave me not to eat: I was thirsty, and you gave me not to drink.
 
So he curses the fig tree and it withers.
A fit of pique, on the part of purported Godhead?

reen12
Our God has had many instructive “fits of pique” including the destruction of the entire world in the Flood, from which only 8 people were saved on account of their obedience to Him, and the destruction of the two great cities, Sodom and Gomorrah, from which only three people (all of whom were sinners, though apparently not as bad as everyone else, and considered “righteous” by comparison to their neighbors) were saved.
 
Just because Catholics believe sin removes grace, doesn’t mean we believe good works “earn” us grace. A bullet cannot give you life, but it can kill you. In the same manner, works cannot earn you grace but they can deprive you of grace. By your reasoning, anyone who thinks a bullet can kill must also think a bullet can give life.
You might add to that thought the point that it is not the “works” of sin that cause one to fall away from Christ but the *disposition of the soul *that causes one to sin that costs us our perseverance. It is grace that holds us in the hand of God. In the lists of things Paul gives that cannot part us from God, sin is conspicuously absent. Even remaining in grace is grace, and it requires assent of the will. For to lose our free will is to lose our ability to love.
 
That’s right; therefore, you’re arguing from silence. The best you can do is argue from inference that one can lose salvation—that’s the best that you can do.
I did not cite these verses to support my position. You cited them to support your position. I simply pointed out that they do NOT support your position… not in the slightest. And I am not arguing from silence. I am moving rationally and logically from all of scripture scripture to doctrine, based upon the texts and centuries of Tradition and teaching authority. The bible clearly speaks of one possibly losing salvation, and facing judgment instead. See, for example:
[26] For if we sin deliberately **after **receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,
[27] but a fearful prospect of judgment,
and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries.
[28] A man who has violated the law of Moses dies without mercy at the testimony of two or three witnesses.
[29] How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he **was **sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace? (Heb 10:26-29 [Emphasis added.])
How does one ignore passages like this? This is clearly addressed to true believers, to urge them to remain in Christ and avoid the sin that separates one from the state of justification and exposes one to a “fearful prospect of judgment” and a “fury of fire” meant to consume the adversaries.
sanduskly:
In that passage, Christ is charged with "raising up those given to Him by the Father on the last day,” ISTM that you’re denying that. Furthermore, it’s also stated in that passage that one is unable to come to Christ except that He be dragged to Christ by the Father.
I’m not denying Christ or the faith given by grace that leads to salvation. Your method for responding to my position seems to be restating it incorrectly. My point was that Jn 6:38-39 ([38] For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; [39] and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day.) Does not exclude the possibility of a professing Christian to fall away and thereby spend eternity in Hell as described in Hebrews, supra. And again, nothing in Jn 6:39 supports your conclusion that salvation is assured in the manner of OSAS.
40.png
sandusky:
Do you think that Christ is unable to do the will of the Father as stated in Jn 6:39?
First, let me assure you I have no doubts about the power of God. Of course that is not what I am questioning. My apologies if I have been unclear. What I am saying is that YOU cannot know with absolute certainty that you are saved. My contention is that human beings are not given absolute knowledge of their ultimate destination. OSAS is false in that regard. Dangerously false.
40.png
sandusky:
The salvation you describe above is not of grace, but of works.
No. It is not. It is salvation by grace, and not apart from Christ. Sadly, you have been trained to be blind to that fact, even though others more eloquent than I could hope to be have also pointed it out to you, on this very thread.

sandusky said:
🤷 See Jn 5:24, 29 as well; what you say doesn’t affect what I’ve said.
[25] "Truly, truly, I say to you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live.
[26] For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself,
[27] and has given him authority to execute judgment, because he is the Son of man.
[28] Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice
[29] and come forth, those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment.
This supports the Catholic position on justification. It does not support OSAS. I’m sorry but if you think otherwise you will have to explain your rationale to me.
40.png
sandusky:
Again, you argue from silence. Romans 8:30
Again, I must point out that I am not presenting these passages to support my position. You have cited these passages to support your position. I am rebutting your conclusions, which are not supported by the text. See Heb., supra.
40.png
sandusky:
…and these whom He predestined, "He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified.
According to that passage, what can be said of the true believer at the present time is that he is justified.
Once again, I am not attacking the meaning of this scripture. I am asserting that no person can know - with the absolute certainly that you ascribe to OSAS - that their final destination is heaven. Salvation is determined at the end of life… not at some point in the midst of a life that can change by an act of free will. The fact that God knows who he has predestined does not support the conclusion that WE can KNOW (as does God) that we are predestined for salvation. At best, we can have a moral assurance that those who remain in Christ will be saved.

Peace,
-Robert
 
**monergism.com/**

****Monoergism was condemned as a heresy by the Sixth Ecumenical Council.

It is NOT the historic Christian faith.

Even Pope Honorius was condemned by this council because of it.****
 
The burning bush was not destroyed by the flames. It was even
more a little bush, after God spoke from it. A considerable
contrast with the destructive behavior of Jesus.


**Reen, Jesus IS God Incarnate risen from the dead.

And historically, the Burning Bush is seen as a prophecy of the Virgin Mary.**
 
The burning bush was not destroyed by the flames. It was even
more a little bush, after God spoke from it. A considerable
contrast with the destructive behavior of Jesus.

Reen, Jesus IS God Incarnate risen from the dead.

And historically, the Burning Bush is seen as a prophecy of the Virgin Mary.
O boy. If they have trouble with Mary as the Ark of the New Covenant, wait till they get hold of the Burning bush as a type of Our Lady! This is going to be fun.
 
My father can disinherit me all he wants…I’ll never cease from being his son.

Galatians 4:6
And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.

With respect to my sonship in Christ, I don’t beleive that someone who is born again can forsake Christ because he is born of God. See I John 3:9, Eph 1:13, and Ephesians 4:30
If a man does forsake Christ then he is like Judas was, and that is: “a devil from the beginning”.
Man. This thread is so far past this post it’s probably not worth responding to this, but I just had to mention one thing.

To use that verse from Paul’s letter to the Galatians the way you did seems to be taking it out of context. In fact, I think most objective readers would agree that that letter points to a possibility of a falling away from the faith, aka apostasy. Right at the beginning of that letter Paul speaks of those who were “turning away so soon from Him who called” them “in the grace of Christ” and were turning “to a different gospel”. (Gal 1:6). He wasn’t writing to Pagans, he was writing to Christians who already received the gospel (Gal 1:9); “begun in the Spirit” (Gal 3:3); “put on Christ” (Gal 3:27); and as you pointed out, received the “Spirit of His Son” into their hearts (Gal 4:6). The Christians of Galatia received many graces and yet some still turned away from the gospel they previously received into their hearts, thus becoming estranged/severed/separated from Christ and so Paul declared that they had “fallen from grace” (Gal 5:4). Paul was obviously alarmed by the fact Christians were falling away --turning to a different gospel – and that was the precise reason he wrote his letter to the Galatians to begin with.
 
I simply believed that Jesus Christ paid for my sins with his blood and I called upon him to save me: just like the Philipian jailer in Acts 16:31. He asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved…” He did, and he was.
Hehe … well … that’s ONE verse that points to what we must DO.
Is there ANYTHING at all, in addition to believing, that is necessary?
Is there ANYTHING at all, if you don’t DO, will keep you from heaven?

I’ve given this analogy here before.
You want to go on a camping trip.
Your dad tells you one day that you will need a good tent.
Another day, he tells you you need a flashlight.
Another day, your uncle tells you that you need a map.
another day, he tells you that you need a way to make fire.

Now I ask, does it make sense for you to pick ONE line and say “My dad said I needed a flashlight and I do so that’s all I need for a camping trip”?
Or … do you think it makes sense that you need to consider ALL that you were told?

michel
 
Thesis statement:

The apostle Paul was the first Catholic missionary.​

I told my Baptist buddy that Paul was the first Catholic “evangelist” and his response was “hmm, that’s interesting.”

What is truly interesting is overall lack of knowledge when it comes to the historical background of The Church. (Catholics and Protestants) A sincere Protestant who want to deepen his or her faith will dive into history and find oodles of wonderful examples of christian faith and morals. Once they realize it in no way conflicts with catholic theology, their world opens up and the pull toward the Church becomes very strong. Sadly, it is usually not strong enough to overcome family history and sentimentality. (won’t stop me for praying for 'em though & this includes my own father)

Heri. Hodie. Semper
“Jesus is the same, Yesterday, Today, and Forever” - from Hebrews

Catholic Church is worldwide with the same gospel reading on all continents for any given Sunday. All are welcome.:cool:
 
That may be true (it’s been a while since I read the JDDJ). But saying that “faith alone” is legitimate isn’t the same as saying we agree with it.

“Together we confess: By grace alone, in faith in Christ’s saving work and not because of any merit on our part, we are accepted by God and receive the Holy Spirit, who renews our hearts while equipping and calling us to good works.”
As embarrasing as it may be for RCs, the document acknowledges that both churches have a correct understanding of justification but use different terminology.
 
Robert in SD:
I did not cite these verses to support my position. You cited them to support your position. I simply pointed out that they do NOT support your position… not in the slightest. And I am not arguing from silence. I am moving rationally and logically from all of scripture scripture to doctrine, based upon the texts and centuries of Tradition and teaching authority.
You weren’t moving anywhere in the post, Robert, but offered this statement: “But nowhere does it say that a person is shackled to the gift and cannot spurn or even kill it.”

And as I responded, other than that, the best thing you can do is infer that one can lose salvation based upon stern exhortation.
Robert in SD:
How does one ignore passages like this? This is clearly addressed to true believers, to urge them to remain in Christ and avoid the sin that separates one from the state of justification and exposes one to a “fearful prospect of judgment” and a “fury of fire” meant to consume the adversaries.
One doesn’t ignore them (Heb 10:26ff), but understands from the whole of scripture, and the strength of various statements how such an exhortation and warning fits into the whole.

No “preacher” knows the heart of those to whom he preaches; thus, he proceeds on the assumption that all in his hearing are truly a part of the church; the same is true of the writers of Scripture. Nevertheless, both know that within the group being addressed are those who do not believe.

There are various reasons they know that. In this particular case, the reason is the desire of those who left Judaism to return to it.

They are not true believers.

Those “adversaries” spoken of in the passage are those who believe contrary to, or, who are opposed to God’s program of salvation—the true believer is not opposed to God’s program of salvation, and he never will be opposed to it, but he will persevere in his faith to the end, based upon God’s grace toward him in the beginning of his faith.

In the beginning of the book, the writer makes this statement:**Hebrews 3:6

but Christ was faithful as a Son over His house—whose house we are, if we hold fast our confidence and the boast of our hope firm until the end.**As a Catholic, you will draw the inference, ”If we do not hold fast, then we shall cease to be Christ’s house and shall be lost.”

However, the verse doesn’t say that. It says that, if there is no perseverance of faith in the future, we are not now Christ’s house. The failure to meet the future condition is due to not experiencing the past conclusion (v14):**Hebrews 3:14

For we have become partakers of Christ, if we hold fast the beginning of our assurance firm until the end**I pointed that out as well, using Col 1:21-23 earlier in this thread.

IOW, anyone meeting the destructive end described in Heb 10 never was a member of Christ’s house to begin with.
Robert in SD:
My point was that Jn 6:38-39 ([38] For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; [39] and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day.) Does not exclude the possibility of a professing Christian to fall away and thereby spend eternity in Hell as described in Hebrews, supra.
Depends upon what you mean by “professing Christian.”
Robert in SD:
My contention is that human beings are not given absolute knowledge of their ultimate destination. OSAS is false in that regard. Dangerously false.
🤷 I know that’s what your 2000-year-old infallible teaching magisterium says, however, that’s not what the apostle John said.

I’m going with John.
Robert in SD:
No. It is not. It is salvation by grace, and not apart from Christ. Sadly, you have been trained to be blind to that fact, even though others more eloquent than I could hope to be have also pointed it out to you, on this very thread.
If you can lose salvation by bad performance, or sin, that’s not salvation by grace, but salvation by works, no matter how your church spins it for you. 🤷
Robert in SD:
Once again, I am not attacking the meaning of this scripture. I am asserting that no person can know - with the absolute certainly that you ascribe to OSAS - that their final destination is heaven. Salvation is determined at the end of life… not at some point in the midst of a life that can change by an act of free will. The fact that God knows who he has predestined does not support the conclusion that WE can KNOW (as does God) that we are predestined for salvation. At best, we can have a moral assurance that those who remain in Christ will be saved.
Again, that’s what your 2000-year-old infallible teaching magisterium says, however, that’s not what the apostle John said.
 
I just hope that people will see that God’s grace is through faith in Christ and not in some man made rituals.
And you can also ditch those pesky moral teahings of the Catholic Church.

Seems like win/win situation!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top