D
Deltadeliquent
Guest
Is there any unofficial bias against icons written by women?
Any official bias?
Any official bias?
“Writing” icons is a term used by iconographers for the method by which they pray and produce (PAINT) the icons.Absolutely not. That business about “writing” icons is mostly hogwash. Icons are painted.
As pianistclare said, writing pertains to the environment of prayer used in their production, as opposed to a piece of art produced for aesthetic purposes. Surely you didn’t mean to offend the Byzantine tradition by calling a very sacred process “hogwash”Absolutely not. That business about “writing” icons is mostly hogwash. Icons are painted.
I don’t have the specifics but I had many a conversation about this years ago. The use of the term was popularized years back by an Anglican if memory serves me. The insistence that icons are “written” was based on a literal translation of the Greek term, which was unnecessarily imbued with an imagined symbolism. Its quite normal to simply say an icon is “painted”, and actually sounds less grandiose and pretentious, besides being more correct.“Writing” icons is a term used by iconographers for the method by which they pray and produce (PAINT) the icons.
I’m actually of the Byzantine tradition and paint icons myself. I know it’s become a popular folk tradition, but it’s not quite true.As pianistclare said, writing pertains to the environment of prayer used in their production, as opposed to a piece of art produced for aesthetic purposes. Surely you didn’t mean to offend the Byzantine tradition by calling a very sacred process “hogwash”.
But relevant to the topic, I don’t know of this biased. There are very few who produce Syriac-style icons and one of them, much better than her mentor I will say, is a Maronite nun. I attended her PhD dissertation in Kaslik and she presented an icon she had made of Shmooni and her sons - to borrow a Byzantine phrase, it was a true “window to heaven.”
Okay, I see what you’re saying now. I misinterpreted your initial post, my fault. There are some people who wonder into this forum who just seek to blast our traditions, my apologies for the misunderstanding.You’ll also find people who are adamant that icons need not be blessed or even should not be blessed. You’ll also find that it’s the norm in the Greek tradition to leave the icon on the altar for 40 day while Russians may just perform a simple blessing. Its not necessarily wrong to say that an icon is “written” but it’s a bit of a novelty, in truth.
No problem, my apologies if I came off brash. I’ve also seen it left on the altar for one liturgy. There seems to be plenty of variation and customs when it comes to iconography, which is great.Okay, I see what you’re saying now. I misinterpreted your initial post, my fault. There are some people who wonder into this forum who just seek to blast our traditions, my apologies for the misunderstanding.
But I see what you’re saying, I’ve read before that the idea of writing an icon is a singularly English idiom that’s become popular amongst converts in the US like those of the OCA. However, interesting you should bring up the Byzantine tradition of leaving an icon by the altar for a time period - in the Syriac tradition we don’t really have any parallel. We could ask a priest to bless it but we don’t have a standardized form of formally blessing it.
CHRISTOS RAZDAJETSJA!Is there any unofficial bias against icons written by women?
Any official bias?
That’s a really great link! Thanks for that.CHRISTOS RAZDAJETJSA!
SLAVITE JEHO!
Here is an interesting article on using the term “write” for icons,
orthodoxartsjournal.org/is-write-wrong-a-discussion-of-iconology-lingo-2/