If a priest is invalid is confession invalid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MeganCecilia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

MeganCecilia

Guest
I just saw a video where a priest had to go through the whole process again because he was baptized with the word “we” instead of “I.”

If a priest didn’t know he was baptized that way (and he wouldn’t be a valid priest) would this make confessions invalid?

I’m assuming it won’t have an affect on God’s mercy because neither parties are aware but I want the true answer on this. Thank you 🙂
 
I just saw a video where a priest had to go through the whole process again because he was baptized with the word “we” instead of “I.”

If a priest didn’t know he was baptized that way (and he wouldn’t be a valid priest) would this make confessions invalid?

I’m assuming it won’t have an affect on God’s mercy because neither parties are aware but I want the true answer on this. Thank you 🙂
Canon law: Ecclesia supplet (1983 CIC 144.1) describes the Church’s power to supply, under limited circumstances, jurisdiction for an act.
 
My understanding is that the confession wouldn’t be valid. But God is not bound by the sacraments.
 
I just saw a video where a priest had to go through the whole process again because he was baptized with the word “we” instead of “I.”

If a priest didn’t know he was baptized that way (and he wouldn’t be a valid priest) would this make confessions invalid?
Are you referring to the recent case in the Archdiocese of Detroit?

Baptism is the gateway to all other sacraments. An invalid baptism means that he could not be validly confirmed or ordained, which means that he could not offer valid masses or give sacramental absolution.

The Archdiocese is taking this very seriously, and is working to contact everyone who attempted to receive sacraments through this man so that they can have their situations rectified. He has since been validly ordained, and is distressed that this happened (through no fault of his own).

If someone confessed mortal sins to him and was unfortunate enough to die before his next confession, I’m sure that God wouldn’t hold it against him.
 
Last edited:
Yes I saw that case and it freaked me out. If somehow a priest I confessed to at some point in my life wasn’t validly ordained…

And I have no way of knowing!!
 
Yes I saw that case and it freaked me out. If somehow a priest I confessed to at some point in my life wasn’t validly ordained…

And I have no way of knowing!!
Not to worry. God wouldn’t hold it against you, and those sins would be sacramentally forgiven the next time you confessed to a different priest (even if you didn’t know you needed to re-confess them).
 
Last edited:
The Archdiocese of Detroit answered your question in their FAQ regarding Fr. Hood (the priest who discovered he was not baptized and thus not a priest).
I went to confession before Father Hood realized he was not validly ordained. Did I receive absolution of my sins through him?

No, you did not receive sacramental absolution, which is the act of a priest during confession through which God grants the penitent pardon and peace. Since Father Hood was not validly ordained, he was unable to provide sacramental absolution.

However, in this situation, you should reflect on the fact that you attempted to do as Jesus instructed us in the Gospel when he gave priests the power to absolve sins (Jn. 20:22–23). You can always be comforted in the fact that God knows that you made every effort to follow His plan exactly for the forgiveness of your sins. The Church, following St. Thomas Aquinas, maintains that God has bound Himself to the sacraments, but He is not bound by the sacraments (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church , 1257 and St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae III, q. 64 a. 7 and III q. 68 a. 2). This means that while we can have certainty that God always works through the sacraments when they are properly conferred by the minister, God is not bound by the sacraments in that He can and does extend His grace in a sovereign way. We can be assured that all those who approached Father Hood, in good faith, to make a confession did not walk away without some measure of grace and forgiveness from God.

That said, if you recall any grave (mortal) sins that you would have confessed to Father Hood before he was validly ordained and you have not yet been to a subsequent confession, you must bring them to your next confession explaining to any priest what has happened. If you cannot remember if you confessed any grave sins, you should bring that fact to your next confession as well. A subsequent absolution will include those sins and will give you peace of mind.
It seems like the best strategy to avoid any sort of issue is to confess to a variety of priests. If priest A is somehow not ordained (Or messes up somehow), then when you go to priest B the next time who is ordained/ does not mess up, he will absolve everything including whatever was left over from priest A. I have confessed to 4 different priests over the last 2 months so the odds are that most if not all of them were validly ordained (and did not mess up), and I’m not worried.
 
Last edited:
Yes I saw that case and it freaked me out. If somehow a priest I confessed to at some point in my life wasn’t validly ordained…

And I have no way of knowing!!
It would be a valid confession unless you knew that it was an invalid priest.
 
It would be a valid confession unless you knew that it was an invalid priest.
No, it would be “presumed valid” if she, or the Church, didn’t know the priest was invalid.
It would not BE valid.

When I go to confess, I always have to trust God and presume the confession is valid because I don’t get to personally check on the credentials of all my priests. I trust the Diocese to do that and not let the guy have a parish assignment unless they’ve made sure he is a priest in good standing with faculties to hear confessions.
 
Last edited:
It seems like the best strategy to avoid any sort of issue is to confess to a variety of priests.
Thank you for all the information you gave.

I guess my problem is I have Scrupulosity so I have to go to one priest hahah maybe I can mention the issue to him and he can confirm he was validly baptized?
 
It seems like the best strategy to avoid any sort of issue is to confess to a variety of priests.
–The problem I have with this strategy is that it tacitly encourages the scrupulous to confess the same things over and over again, and to run from one priest to the next, under the theory that “maybe the last priest I went to wasn’t really a priest!”

The likelihood that “the priest isn’t really a priest since he wasn’t baptized” is so astronomically low that IMHO it’s not something that should make anyone change their behavior one whit.
 
Of course, if she is scrupulous then she may need to go to just one priest.
And further she should discuss her concerns in this regard with the priest.

Most of us aren’t scrupulous. I can’t even know for sure which priest or priests will be hearing confession at my parish when I go, as we have the luxury of having a few of them. I just randomly end up with whatever priest is available.
 
Last edited:
I really feel for the scrupulous here. This must be inducing a ton of “maybe my priest isn’t really a priest!” anxiety.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top