If God can harden Pharaoh's heart, why didn't he change the hearts of His people's enemies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rutherford2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Rutherford2

Guest
Instead of motivating His people to fight the enemies don’t you think it would have been much easier if God just change the heart of the enemies? Please don’t tell me they have freewill because Pharol also has freewill but God harten his heart anyway.
 
Last edited:
God knows the heart in a way that we do not. So God can withdraw grace or allow a person to become confused in thinking even in anticipation of any particular act by which one might judge such a person. In the Bible, others closed themselves off from the grace of God, so that they are not open to seeing clearly or accepting what God is offering.
You may disagree, but please don’t tell me your interpretation is the only one possible.
 
God has chosen to display the full range of His attributes. When He saves someone, He is showing His mercy. When He punishes someone, He is showing His holiness. By hardening Pharaoh’s heart, He was glorifying Himself because Pharaoh deserved the punishment he got. Hardening his heart was all a part of God’s plan to make His name great. He knew that people in the future would read about the Exodus and would glorify God for it.

I believe that God’s primary interest is to glorify Himself. He did so when He hardened Pharaoh’s heart and killed him and his men.
 
God hardening Pharaoh’s heart was punishment for the multitude of sins Pharaoh committed even after seeing a great many signs. Pharaoh was given many opportunities to let the Israelites go, but each time he wouldn’t agree to the terms or went back on his word. Sometimes, he even confessed his sins, but he still would not let the Israelites go. Even his own advisers were begging him to capitulate because YHWH was destroying Egypt, and still Pharaoh refused. Eventually, God’s patience yields to His Justice, and so He lured Pharaoh into a trap and wiped out his entire army.
 
others closed themselves off from the grace of God, so that they are not open to seeing clearly or accepting what God is offering.
Well it is the people’s freewill whether they wanted to accept God’s grace isn’t it? I thought God gave us freewill?
 
He lured Pharaoh into a trap and wiped out his entire army.
Well, God could have just wipe Pharoah out instead of the entire army don’t you think? You did say his advisors were begging him to capitulate. It’s not their fault, they were just obeying Pharoah’s commands.
 
God didn’t will that the Pharaoh’s heart be hardened. He allowed the Pharaoh to willingly harden his heart.
 
Did God not already know he wouldn’t? Why even waste everyones time with all of the chances when he said from the beginning Pharoah wouldn’t let them go?
 
Hardening the heart is an Egyptian expression…

The Egyptians, like most of the peoples and like a lot of the Jews, did plenty of evil things in daily life, as a country. If God wanted to condemn them to death, He has a right to do it. He did not always choose to do it, because He had plans to help everyone. But if a people could have reined in their king and didn’t, they were partly at fault.

Pharaoh was in charge, so he was the most worthy of punishment. Pharaoh called himself a god although knowing he was not, so God included him in his campaign of plagues against the Egyptian false gods.

God demonstrated to Pharaoh that he was in fact weak and powerless, that his people were his only power and that he needed to care for them instead of mistreating them, and gave him a reality check.

This did not end the custom of calling pharaohs gods, unfortunately, but it ensured that the leaders and kings of Israel and Judah never played that stupid game, even though many of their neighbors in Canaan did.

The thing is that the Promised Land is snack dab in the middle of enemies. Egypt was not all that expansionist, but they did expand at times. They could have made Israel an Egyptian province with Egyptian gods. But Egyptians also hated to record or think about defeats and misfortunes. Associating Israel with all sorts of terrible smiting, by a god more powerful than Pharaoh or the major gods, made Israel safe from Egypt for a long time.
 
Great question!
I did some googling myself and found this. I think we all need to be mindful of the cultural and literary context of the time.

 
Here, read this: [Exodus 7:3-4] “But I will harden Pharaoh’s heart, and though I multiply my miraculous signs and wonders in Egypt he will not listen to you. Then I will lay my hand on Egypt and with mighty acts of judgment I will bring out my people the Israelites.”
 
If you read the article I posted, the opinion is that God permitted or allowed Pharaoh’s heart to be hardened.

My own contribution to this as I have studied a bit of Hebrew is that the verb in question is a hiphil imperfect. Note Hebrew only has perfect and imperfect aspect. There is no mood or tense. Hence any action that wasn’t completed once and finished in the past belongs to imperfect. Hiphil usually implies some sort of causation and contribution. So I think the article makes sense from a grammar point of view.
 
Last edited:
It wouldn’t be much of a story that way
 
Last edited:
Here, read this: [Exodus 7:3-4] “But I will harden Pharaoh’s heart, and though I multiply my miraculous signs and wonders in Egypt he will not listen to you. Then I will lay my hand on Egypt and with mighty acts of judgment I will bring out my people the Israelites.”
God gives actual grace even before a person is made just through cooperation, and also knows which persons will and will not be justified in the end. God can implement His providence as seen most beneficial to all.
 
There are multiple points in the Bible where people are warned not to harden their hearts (making the people the subjects and their hearts the object). They don’t warn people not to have God harden their hearts (making God appear to be the subject).

It’s only in Exodus where we get the phrase where God hardens a heart. Believers have to twist the language so that even though the text is abundantly clear, we are supposed to believe the exact opposite of the text.
 
It’s my understanding that pharaoh’s heart “being hardened” refers to him rejecting God’s grace. It’s not something that God put into him, but something which God took away from him (if he had it to begin with).
 
Instead of motivating His people to fight the enemies don’t you think it would have been much easier if God just change the heart of the enemies? Please don’t tell me they have freewill because Pharol also has freewill but God harten his heart anyway.
The first thing is we don’t read the bible as fundamentalists do. You seem to be proposing that God forced Pharaoh to behave badly, in a literalist reading of the passage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top