The easy answer: God IS love. And love is something to be shared.
The business about evil coming into the world has to do with God giving us free will. If God saw that we might sometimes choose evil, he could have done three things:
- Not create us (but then the love that God IS would not be shared)
- Create us without free will (but then we would be robots, and incapable of true love)
- Create us with free will, and send His son to get us back on track
Guess which option He chose?
Your analysis is incorrect.
First, love is not some wishy-washy emotion, that can be shared. Love is an act in the best interest of the loved ones.
Second, free will does not logically lead to evil, only the potentiality of evil.
Third,
only robots can have true love, who always act in the best interest of the loved ones (again, love is not an emotion).
Fourth, the “chosen path” did not work. The evil did not decrease.
Fifth, since the existence of free will does not lead logically to evil, you forgot the option of creating everyone with free will, where no one will choose evil on their own volition. This one is possible, though still inferior to option #3, since free agents may choose evil, while robots cannot.
According to Catholics, the ultimate desire of God is to have everyone be with him, to share the bliss only he can provide - which is of course in our best interest. Therefore the only logical solution would have been to create us directly in heaven. That would have been the perfect solution.
To create us with free will is dumb. If free will would lead logically to evil (thought it does not) then giving free will is the best way to destroy the ultimate goal of God - thereby you say that God is an idiot. Why do you believers always portray God as a bumbling idiot, who knows what is the best for everyone, who could achieve that, and still did not do it? Your analysis is always disrespectful to the extreme. Why?