A
AlNg
Guest
I think it was the Macedonian Orthodox Church. The problem was that Macedonia claims independence but this is disputed by Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia.Do you know which Orthodox Church?
I think it was the Macedonian Orthodox Church. The problem was that Macedonia claims independence but this is disputed by Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia.Do you know which Orthodox Church?
AFAIK, SSPX and many Catholics believe that that Church is wrong on granting so many marriage annulments. And to say that someone was not married, when they actually were. And to require that a couple obtain a divorce before presenting their case to the marriage tribunal. Jesus said: “Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her.” Mark 10: 11. Even Cardinal Kasper said that this process in some cases can be a divorce in a dishonest way. Are you saying that Cardinal Kasper should not be Catholic ? During his interview in America magazine Cardinal Kasper said: “This marriage was a reality, and to say it was canonically null and void does not make sense to me. This is an abstract canonical construction. It’s divorce in a Catholic way, in a dishonest way.”Same way, Catholics should not act like … they are actually wrong- if they truly believe so, they should not be Catholic
I disagree. Although the main issue is supreme and immediate jurisdiction over the whole Church by the Bishop of Rome, I think that there are other issues involved.Yup. Exactly.
Uhm, sure. And peace is war, and . . .I’m the most recent conversation I had with this person, they insisted that while proselytizing Orthodox was wrong, evangelizing them should indeed be carried out.
I think it was that one, but my memory is to fuzzy to commit. But it might have been Macedonian, as suggested as @AlNg. (heck, maybe it was both . . . there have been a few of these over the centuries . . .)Do you know which Orthodox Church? Was it the Georgian Patriarchate?
Yes. That makes sense. The Macedonian Orthodox Church is schismatic and uncanonical and not recognized by any of the Autocephalous Orthodox Patriarchates. Constantinople was threatening a few months ago to recognize them (as a way to consolidate power) and grant them autocephaly much to the distress of the Serbian and Greek Orthodox Churches.I think it was the Macedonian Orthodox Church. The problem was that Macedonia claims independence but this is disputed by Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia.
If it was the Georgian Patriarchate and they were to enter into communion with Rome that would be a staggering defeat for the Orthodox side of the Schism. Georgia is currently considered one of the holiest and most venerable of the Orthodox Churches in our communion and is known for its faithfulness to Holy Tradition.I think it was that one, but my memory is to fuzzy to commit. But it might have been Macedonian, as suggested as @AlNg. (heck, maybe it was both . . . there have been a few of these over the centuries . . .)
Keep in mind, though, that the bulk of the “newer” Orthodox churches started the same way. After a few decades, they tend to get recognized, and eventually kind of get a retroactive canonicity.The Macedonian Orthodox Church is schismatic and uncanonical
Is the Pope setting a bad example in stating Catholics should not convert the Orthodox?He should. Does he? Up to debate (not saying either is true, as per usual). IOW Catholics can consider Pope’s example bad and still be good Catholics.
Actually the Melkite Catholic and Ukrainian Catholic Churches (which are in full communion with Rome) venerate St Gregory Palamas, so if eastern Catholics are free to venerate him as a Saint I see absolutely no reason why western Catholics can’t, also Saint Pope JPII had nothing but good things to say about St Gregory Palamas.AlNg:
I have found out more information about Gregory Palamas. He is certainly not a saint and not only because he is orthodox but for other reasons also, namely for teaching a heresy which is now known by the name of Palamism. The Catholic encyclopedia in fact has a lot to say about thisSt. Gregory Palamas is recognized as a saint
I am one of them. I do not judge individual cases but objectively some things feel like divorce in disguise.AFAIK, SSPX and many Catholics believe that that Church is wrong on granting so many marriage annulments.
On the contrary. Catholic Church teaches what is and is not valid matter for annulment. Those who dissent and abuse it stand against the Church.Are you saying that Cardinal Kasper should not be Catholic ?
Capital punishment is another area of disagreement.
Artificial birth control for married couples with more than 4 children.
That comes down to personal opinionDropping the atomic bomb on japan. BTW, I agree with the teaching that this was wrong, but there are Catholics who say it was justified because it saved lives.
First, Catholic should believe Catholic Church is Church of Christ built upon Peter. They should obey infallible and binding things… others are up to their opinion. Second, I believe those who do not do so should not pretend to be Catholics. That is all.There are many areas where Catholics disagree with the Church and still remain Catholics. AFAIK, Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi have not been excommunicated.
I think that there are other issues involved.
Yes, but dialogue nor unity with Orthodox Church are not prime goal of Catholic Church. Church guards truth in our eyes and Church is built to spread the True Gospel. As long as that is not compromised other goals come in- such as unity with Orthodox Church. If prime goal is unity with Orthodoxy, Catholics could just en masse convert to it.if the goal of the dialogue between the Catholics and Orthodox is ordered to achieve restoration of communion
That’s all well and good, but I’m asking the question precisely in the context of that dialogue.Yes, but dialogue nor unity with Orthodox Church are not prime goal of Catholic Church.
If this is case, then shouldn’t the Catholic Church just make the ultimatum to the Orthodox that the only way is to achieve restoration of communion is for the Orthodox to accept the “True Gospel” by submitting to the Pope and stop wasting time in dialogue?Church guards truth in our eyes and Church is built to spread the True Gospel.
You know that is entirely antithetical to the purpose of the dialogue between our churches. Mass conversion in either direction is not a restoration of communion or healing of past wrongs.If prime goal is unity with Orthodoxy, Catholics could just en masse convert to it.
Maybe you could explain this for me. It seems what you are saying is that St Peter and his successors in Rome take precedents over the Creed, the Councils, the Sacraments, the Gospel itself?First, Catholic should believe Catholic Church is Church of Christ built upon Peter.
I don’t know which Pope said that, but if anyone says that they they are wrong regardless of who they are or what position they are in. Truth is objective.Is the Pope setting a bad example in stating Catholics should not convert the Orthodox?
If for the same of argument a Pope was to set a different example to that of all of his predecessors, then yesCatholics can consider Pope’s example bad and still be good Catholics.
This is because they accidentally and naturally have the same calendar as they had before they came into full communion (the Eastern Orthodox calendar). They should really remove him from the calendar as did the Uniate Church. I would suggest researching the Council of Zamosc (1720).Actually the Melkite Catholic and Ukrainian Catholic Churches (which are in full communion with Rome) venerate St Gregory Palamas, so if eastern Catholics are free to venerate him as a Saint I see absolutely no reason why western Catholics can’t, also Saint Pope JPII had nothing but good things to say about St Gregory Palamas.
Pope Francis said this in 2016 when he visited Georgia. I take it, then, that the Pope was wrong to say this?I don’t know which Pope said that, but if anyone says that they they are wrong regardless of who they are or what position they are in. Truth is objective.
What? Have you read Orientalium Dignitas: On the Churches of the East, Pope Leo XIII - 1894; DECREE ON THE CATHOLIC CHURCHES OF THE EASTERN RITE ORIENTALIUM ECCLESIARUM SOLEMNLY PROMULGATED BY HIS HOLINESS POPE PAUL VIThis is because they accidentally and naturally have the same calendar as they had before they came into full communion (the Eastern Orthodox calendar).
There is nothing wrong with using the same Calendar as the orthodox, but as a consequence some people have remained in it which should’ve been removedWhat? Have you read Orientalium Dignitas: On the Churches of the East, Pope Leo XIII
If anyone says that it is not the will of God that everyone becomes a Catholic, they are wrong, regardless of who they are or what position they hold. Pope Francis can answer that question himself by implicationPope Francis said this in 2016 when he visited Georgia. I take it, then, that the Pope was wrong to say this?