If jesus had cousins, does that mean he still has distant descendants on earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter benjammin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Conversion did occur, but not very often. For one, the Jewish faith was never evangelical. It was a tribal faith that leaned heavily on blood ties.

The other reason was that converts had to… uh… you know, do the snip-snip on male adult converts and there was no anesthesia in the old days. For this reason, the rare converts in the old days tended to be women who converted to marry Jewish men and not the other way around.

But yes, some conversion did take place. But they have that DNA testing now and it does appears that most Jews share some genetic markers. And nearly every convert married a Jew so… yeah, we are all related more or less.

To be honest, I am genetically only 1/2 Jewish. But I am considered 100% Jewish by the Jewish faith that follows the maternal line. Along those lines, my son is only 1/4 Jewish genetically, but 100% Jewish by the tenets of that faith, and 100% Catholic by his baptism at infancy. He also has Down syndrome which means he has a genetic make-up unlike most or all the other people on this board.

And some of us may be illegitimate, but that is irrelevant. The question was about having distant relative to Jesus, not whether those relatives were legitimate or illegitimate. Some folks are born out of wedlock, but the Church still recognizes that person has having a mommy and a daddy, no? Your illegitimate brother is still genetically your brother (or half-brother or whatever… its complicated).

But again, go back far enough and we are all related to Adam and Eve. (This is where we all join hands and sing, “We are the world, we are the children.”
 
Conversion did occur, but not very often. For one, the Jewish faith was never evangelical. It was a tribal faith that leaned heavily on blood ties.

The other reason was that converts had to… uh… you know, do the snip-snip on male adult converts and there was no anesthesia in the old days. For this reason, the rare converts in the old days tended to be women who converted to marry Jewish men and not the other way around.

But yes, some conversion did take place. But they have that DNA testing now and it does appears that most Jews share some genetic markers. And nearly every convert married a Jew so… yeah, we are all related more or less.

To be honest, I am genetically only 1/2 Jewish. But I am considered 100% Jewish by the Jewish faith that follows the maternal line. Along those lines, my son is only 1/4 Jewish genetically, but 100% Jewish by the tenets of that faith, and 100% Catholic by his baptism at infancy. He also has Down syndrome which means he has a genetic make-up unlike most or all the other people on this board.

And some of us may be illegitimate, but that is irrelevant. The question was about having distant relative to Jesus, not whether those relatives were legitimate or illegitimate. Some folks are born out of wedlock, but the Church still recognizes that person has having a mommy and a daddy, no? Your illegitimate brother is still genetically your brother (or half-brother or whatever… its complicated).

But again, go back far enough and we are all related to Adam and Eve. (This is where we all join hands and sing, “We are the world, we are the children.”
Yes, in Acts we see the Gentiles who were adherents to the Jewish faith but were still considered gentiles because, as you said, they didn’t want the snip-snip 😃

But a lot of them were converted by St. Paul.
 
Yes, in Acts we see the Gentiles who were adherents to the Jewish faith but were still considered gentiles because, as you said, they didn’t want the snip-snip 😃

But a lot of them were converted by St. Paul.
You can use the c-word; it won’t get ****ed out 😃
 
Just go back a bit further than Jesus’s cousins.

For example, I am an ethnic Jew, since converted to Catholicism. As a genetic descendent of Abraham, I am distantly related to all Jews, including Jesus who is also a descendent of Abraham. Non-Jewish Christians or “Gentiles” are adopted into the family of Abraham. As you said - it is really not a big deal but yeah, its kind of cool to think that Jesus and I are both ethnically Jewish but no glory to me, just dumb luck.

Take it back further, and we ALL have the same mother and father - Adam and Eve.

It must be mentioned that Muslims also consider themselves descendents of Abraham whereas gentiles are not. Yet many Christians and Jews have no problem bashing Muslims.
…I followed till your final comment… which poor Muslims are being bashed? …has the world forgotten the 700+ years of Spanish occupation by “Los Moros” or the final assault plans that caused the Catholics Kingdoms to finally retake Spain? …the Pope asked for Catholics to pray the Rosary… and the invading Muslim flotilla was devastated by nature putting a halt to their plan of erecting a mosque over St. Peter’s… if we look around the world in the very present times we find that Muslims are the only people whose religious and political heads support terror, extermination, exploitation, murder, slavery, and rape as forms of indoctrination/control of both religious and secular non-Muslims (and at times even those considered lesser Muslims) people…

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Did Eusebius interview some of Jesus’s brothers and sisters ? Its obvious it was his step brothers and sister.

Were they murdered for the faith ?.
…no not quite that obvious… but clearly not the Virgin Mary’s natural sons and daughters!

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Thanks, and I agree although I doubt there have been many converts to Judaism.

My point is that Muslim descendents of Abraham are all from the illegitmate son Ishmael and not the legitimate son Isaac that God chose.
The Jews were the chosen people and not the Muslims.
…which is precisely the Muslim argument: Issaac is not, technically, Abraham’s firstborn; to the Muslim Ishmael is the legitimate firstborn–they fail to note that it is Yahweh God’s Choice not human endevour that both Creates and Maintains the Promise!

Maran atha!

Angel
 
…which is precisely the Muslim argument: Issaac is not, technically, Abraham’s firstborn; to the Muslim Ishmael is the legitimate firstborn–they fail to note that it is Yahweh God’s Choice not human endevour that both Creates and Maintains the Promise!

Maran atha!

Angel
True, and definitely not the last time that God chose a younger son to be the vessel for continuing the righteous line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top