C
chevalier
Guest
I keep hearing that “Love is a Choice”, so does that mean in marriage that attraction, particularly physical attraction shouldn’t play a role in marriage? For example there was this girl that really liked me. I didn’t find her attractive at all for a number of reasons, but I could see why some people would think we made a good match. So should I have just made the “choice” to love her and go out with her even though i wasn’t remotely attracted to her (she not only was not Catholic, she wasn’t really religious at all, was part of some women’s freemason group, had bad social skills, and also just wasn’t physically attractive which I know is mean, but she was nice, just not what i’m into.)
So if love is a choice, can you choose to love someone you aren’t attracted to?
- Freemansons and Catholics aren’t really perfect matches, you know.
- Social skills are useful in a spouse (and girlfriend, before it gets to that point).
- Life’s gonna be hard if you end up marrying someone you aren’t attracted to. Not only will you be unable to go after other women, you will need to procreate and to take care of your wife’s sexual needs. That may become rather remarkably hard when you aren’t attracted.
- ‘Love is a choice’ is a loaded slogan. Love requires commitment and commitment requires your will to reaffirm your previous choices. But love is not an easy 0/1 switch you can just ‘choose’ to switch on (or off, especially).
- Don’t be desperate. You’re talking about forcing yourself into an unappreciated relationship with a Freemason who isn’t attractive to you. Just so you get perspective.
