If not the Real Presence, why Bleeding Hosts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JackmanUSC
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
VociMike:
Now you’ve moved the goalposts. You had said that the “symbolic only” Lord’s Supper was “enough”. I said that it wasn’t up to you or I to decide that a partial (and thus partially false) understanding of Christ’s gift to us was “enough”.
God provides a lot of things; He has blessed me tremendously. The gift that I am talking about is His sacrifice. It all starts there.

The effect of that sacrifice is that if we believe in Him, we can spend eternity with Him.

Because of that sacrifice, I choose to live a certain kind of life: one that is (as best as I can given my human nature) in line with what He has for me. Because of my faith in Him, I submit to His authority which leads to belonging to a church; to tithing to the church; to helping those who are less fortunate than me; to studying His Word to learn more about Him; to praying to Him about my sins, my cares, my needs, my thanks; etc.

I think we all have a “partial” understanding of God. None of us will have a complete understanding until we can sit before Him in Heaven.
 
David Brent:
I don’t think that I can ever get “enough” of Christ. I constantly need more of Christ in that I need to know Him more; know Him better; know Him deeper; know Him more intimately. But I don’t actually “get” Christ by eating a host. I get more of Christ by asking Him in prayer to show me more of Him; to reveal Himself to me; to show me what He has for me. When Christ shows me something He wants from me or for me, I am expected to obey. That should be my only response.

A communion service at my church or Holy Communion at a Catholic mass is an opportunity to remember the sacrifice that Christ made for me. It is not “enough” for any of us – even if we’re talking about a transubstantiated host. Assuming that the host does transubstantiate, it would not be sufficient for you to simply take communion every week. That doesn’t mean anything. What reverance does it show God to take communion and genuflect once a week or once a day (for the serious mass-goers out there) if you make no other effort to become who God wants you to become and do the things that He is calling you to do?
OK, so we have gone from the host being enough to catch your reverence to it meaning nothing. I’m a bit confused.

Now, as for reverence, I do think that it is an incredible sign of reverence for somebody to take an hour each day out of their busy schedules to spend it entirely with God. Now, nobody said that for the other 23 hours these same people don’t do what they are called to do. I try, and sometimes I fail; that’s how things go, I am not perfect. How can I possibly expect to come into communion with God of my own faulty abilities. For me to be in communion with God, He has given us the gift of the Eucharist. It is God because He makes it so. I do not become one with God through simply my own actions; that would be so egotistical of me to think that I could obtain something perfect when I am far from it.

If communion service were only “an opportunity to remember the sacrifice that Christ made,” then I honestly wouldn’t waste my time. I would deal with remembering at home, when it best fit into my schedule. Just look at the word communion: we are in communion with God, not symbolically but literally. We have a physical manifestation of Jesus in us.

Eamon
 
40.png
VociMike:
My point is that you reject the Church which Christ left, the Church which He invested with authority and truth, while insisting that you accept Christ.

We remember His Sacrifice at every Mass. After all, we’re the ones who have crucifixes in our churches.

He also said “this is my body” and “this is is my blood”. He said “My flesh is food indeed and my blood is drink indeed”. The Church has always understood what He meant. But, having separated yourself (or been separated due to your upbringing) from the Church, you have lost that understanding. Instead you (the Protestant world) have had to invent torturous interpretations of Scripture and invisible conspiracies of history (“the winners erased all the true history!”) to arrive at your incorrect and hollow view of this source and summit of Christian life.
I’m not sure how you can say that I reject the Church. If by “Church” you mean a particular building or denomination, then yes, I’ll go with that. I do reject the denominations. They are man-made creations. I go to the church that I do because I think it provides me the best opportunity to grow in my relationship with Christ and because I do not sense the Lord telling me to go somewhere else.

“Torturous interpretations?” I can barely spell “transubstantiation” much less explain it. I think in light of what the Lord said about the Holy Spirit, it is somewhat “torturous” (your word, not mine) to fashion a doctrine whereby bread becomes flesh and wine becomes blood to explain how we can “receive” Christ and know Him in light of His own promise of sending the Holy Spirit for that very purpose.

“Hollow view?” I can assure you that there is nothing “hollow” about the power of the Holy Spirit or my view of it or Jesus.
 
40.png
turboEDvo:
OK, so we have gone from the host being enough to catch your reverence to it meaning nothing. I’m a bit confused.

Now, as for reverence, I do think that it is an incredible sign of reverence for somebody to take an hour each day out of their busy schedules to spend it entirely with God. Now, nobody said that for the other 23 hours these same people don’t do what they are called to do. I try, and sometimes I fail; that’s how things go, I am not perfect. How can I possibly expect to come into communion with God of my own faulty abilities. For me to be in communion with God, He has given us the gift of the Eucharist. It is God because He makes it so. I do not become one with God through simply my own actions; that would be so egotistical of me to think that I could obtain something perfect when I am far from it.

If communion service were only “an opportunity to remember the sacrifice that Christ made,” then I honestly wouldn’t waste my time. I would deal with remembering at home, when it best fit into my schedule. Just look at the word communion: we are in communion with God, not symbolically but literally. We have a physical manifestation of Jesus in us.

Eamon
Are we having fun yet?

My reverance is for Christ. Not the wafer. Not the ceremony. The ceremony with the bread and wine bring me to a point of reverance for the One who made the sacrifice.

I’m a bit surprised that you would say that you wouldn’t waste you time to honor the One who gave His life for you unless He gave you something in return. He owes me and you nothing. He’s already done His part.

I don’t get your “egotistical” comment. None of us are perfect. There is only One who is perfect. But we are called to pray. Essentially, we can fellowship with God whenever we want to. We can have “communion” with Him by going to Him in prayer. It’s not about obtaining anything. It’s about spending time with Him because He is the Creator; because He desires to spend time with us. You don’t have to swallow a communion host to gain access to Him. He’s sitting there waiting for you to call on Him at any time wherever you are!
 
40.png
chadwilliams:
Christ says otherwise. Read all of John Chapter 6. Play close attention to this part:

51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world." 52 The Jews quarreled among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us (his) flesh to eat?” 53 Jesus said to them, "Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. 54 Whoever eats 19 my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. 55 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. 56 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him.

Many people didn’t understand and left. His Apostles stayed, and at the Last Supper, when Christ said (holding the bread) “This is my body…” they realized that “oh, this is what we are supposed to do.”
My point in sharing the verses from John 6:22-50 was to show more of the context of the Bread of Life comments by Jesus. They had just finished feeding the 5000 with the loaves and fishes. But His followers were still hungry. Jesus’ point was that you will always be hungry. I’m not here to feed you loaves and fishes every day. I’m here to show you the Way to eternal life. I am the Bread of Life. You crave food because you are physically hungry, but you don’t realize that you are spiritually hungry too. I will sustain you! Your physical hunger is not your problem. Your problem is that you are starving spiritually – you are separated from God.

The Bread of Life statements are another example of Christ using a metaphor to make His spiritual point.
 
Brent, before you start arguing any further learn what you believe. You don’t believe in Transubstantian but yet you also don’t believe in Consubstantiation. You reject the entire Dogmatic premise of the Real Presence, that even Luther Still accepted.
 
40.png
JackmanUSC:
Brent, before you start arguing any further learn what you believe. You don’t believe in Transubstantian but yet you also don’t believe in Consubstantiation. You reject the entire Dogmatic premise of the Real Presence, that even Luther Still accepted.
You make a good point.

I used to go to a United Methodist church, so I checked out what it has to say on the subject. This is from umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=1341:
Do United Methodists believe the communion elements actually become the body and blood of Christ?

“No, we believe that the change is spiritual. They signify the body and blood of Christ for us, helping us to be Christ’s body in the world today, redeemed by Christ’s blood. We pray over the bread and cup that they may make us one with Christ, “one with each other, and one in service to all the world.”
(United Methodists and Communion brochure)

This Holy Mystery: A United Methodist Understanding of Holy Communion, the official statement on communion, says, "The Christian church has struggled through the centuries to understand just how Christ is present in the Eucharist. Arguments and divisions have occurred over the matter. The Wesleyan tradition affirms the reality of Christ’s presence, although it does not claim to be able to explain it fully…

Article VI of The Confession of Faith of The Evangelical United Brethren Church, speaks…of the sacraments: “They are means of grace by which God works invisibly in us, quickening, strengthening and confirming our faith in him. . . . Those who rightly, worthily and in faith eat the broken bread and drink the blessed cup partake of the body and blood of Christ in a spiritual manner until he comes.”

United Methodists, along with other Christian traditions, have tried to provide clear and faithful interpretations of Christ’s presence in the Holy Meal. Our tradition asserts the real, personal, living presence of Jesus Christ. For United Methodists, the Lord’s Supper is anchored in the life of the historical Jesus of Nazareth, but is not primarily a remembrance or memorial. We do not embrace the medieval doctrine of transubstantiation, though we do believe that the elements are essential tangible means through which God works. We understand the divine presence in temporal and relational terms. In the Holy Meal of the church, the past, present, and future of the living Christ come together by the power of the Holy Spirit so that we may receive and embody Jesus Christ as God’s saving gift for the whole world."

This Holy Mystery: A United Methodist Understanding of Holy Communion Copyright © 2003, 2004 The General Board of Discipleship of The United Methodist Church, PO Box 340003, Nashville TN 37203-0003 (800-972-0433).

That may be the consubstantiation of which you speak. All I know is that I believe that Christ is present today and that I can experience that. Whether something actually happens mysteriously to augment that presence when I take part in communion, who knows? I don’t. You don’t. None of us “know.” You think you do because you believe in a doctrine that was memorialized and passed down through the centuries. But so was the notion that the Earth is flat. That was disproven. You and I will never know whether transubstantiation or consubstantiation or some other nominalization rules the day until we sit down with God in Heaven. I’m not sure I’ll care then either. I think I’d rather know why the sky is blue or why babies smell so great! :cool:
 
40.png
JackmanUSC:
Brent, before you start arguing any further learn what you believe. You don’t believe in Transubstantian but yet you also don’t believe in Consubstantiation. You reject the entire Dogmatic premise of the Real Presence, that even Luther Still accepted.
One other thing Jackman:

Go Gators!!!
 
David Brent:
The sacrifice that He became for us deserves our reverance regardless of whether the bread and wine transubstantiate.My point is that it doesn’t matter whether the communion host and the wine transubstantiate. What they represent is enough to get my attention and focus my reverance on Christ, and what He so graciously did for me.
My brother David, 👋

Your love for Christ is very evident. Thank you for showing us this love for Christ in a very charitable manner. :clapping:

I have many questions, but will stick to this theme “does it matter.”

If Jesus says, “Take, eat; this is my body” and “Drink of it, all of you; for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins,” then why say it does not matter if it transubstantiates or not?

What if it is does transubstantiate? What would you do?

When you receive the bread during communion are your sins forgiven?

Did it matter to Jesus? If it didn’t why would He say, “truly, truly, I say to you, unless you** eat** the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life?” (John 6: 53-54) Have you eaten His flesh and drank His blood? Scripture says very clearly what could happen if you don’t.

You quoted one of my favorite scripture passages, “those who obey my commandments are the ones who love me.” David, what part of “take, eat; this is my body” and “drink … **this is my blood” **is a suggestion? Did Jesus command us or not? If we do not follow these commands can we go against scripture and say we truly love Jesus?

If there is no transubstantiation, then would the old covenant be greater than the new? The manna for the Egyptians came from heaven; the manna Protestants eat comes from the church secretary.

Finally, did you realize that scripture directly or indirectly supports everything the Catholic Church teaches on the holy Eucharist? Can a Protestant say the same?

I see how scriptures say it does matter to Jesus; therefore, it matters to me. As for me and my house we are going to eat His body and drink His blood. Come join us.

My brother, Dave, please take courage and see how scripture supports what the Catholic Church really teaches.

May the Good Shepherd lead to you the bread of life.
God :blessyou:
 
40.png
JackmanUSC:
Another, this one from the US
Worcester, Massachusetts
has been the site of a series of inexplicable events surrounding a twelve year old girl who was brain-damaged in a swimming pool accident when she was 3 years old. Unable to walk or talk the girl, Audrey Santo, has become the focus of a growing number of Catholic mystical experiences. For the past nine years the only solid food she has eaten has been the Holy Communion which she receives daily. Several years ago, the local Bishop permitted the Blessed Sacrament to be reserved in a tabernacle housed in Audrey’s room…
This one has me wondering. First Communion at age 3? In the USA?
What’s the source for this? :confused:
 
It’s amazing that Church fathers wrote about the real presence in the FIRST Century (St Justin, one of the very first to write about Church teachings). Yet, somehow protestant want to ignore the commands as Jesus says so directly in scriptures.

Everything else they want to translate literally, but the real transformation of the Eucharist they want to interpret as allegory. It just doesn’t add up. Plus as referred to in this topic, so many Eucharistic miracles have happened that it is as if Jesus is shouting it out to us. HE really does come to us in Body and Blood during communion.

IF you don’t believe its true, “You have no life within you”. Jesus says, it’s true, we should most definitely believe Him. Why would anyone follow Him in so many other things, but totally ignore Him on this critical issue. That’s what St. Justin tells us to do, take Jesus at His word, the Bread IS His Body, and the Wine IS His Blood…
wc
 
40.png
johnq:
If Jesus says, “Take, eat; this is my body” and “Drink of it, all of you; for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins,” then why say it does not matter if it transubstantiates or not?

Because my salvation doesn’t depend on it. My salvation depends solely on whether I believe in Christ. Whether when faced with the reality of Jesus, did I choose to follow Him?

What if it is does transubstantiate? What would you do?

Nothing. If it does, it does. What more would I do? It doesn’t change Who God is for me or what He’s done for me.

When you receive the bread during communion are your sins forgiven?

Is this question asking if my sins are forgiven before I take communion or as a result of taking communion? If I don’t feel that I am right with the Lord, I don’t partake in communion. But I don’t believe that taking communion brings forgiveness. Forgiveness comes from God when I ask for it with a contrite heart. When I know that we are taking communion, I generally use that occasion to seek His forgiveness in honor of His sacrifice that made the forgiveness available for me.

Did it matter to Jesus? If it didn’t why would He say, “truly, truly, I say to you, unless you** eat** the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life?” (John 6: 53-54) Have you eaten His flesh and drank His blood? Scripture says very clearly what could happen if you don’t.

As I noted above, the context of John 6 is post-feeding the 5000. He used the occasion to make His point about needing something more than food and drink. “Eat” and “drink” are calls for people to embrace Who He said He was and to believe in Him. Those Who believe in Him shall not perish but have eternal life.

You quoted one of my favorite scripture passages, “those who obey my commandments are the ones who love me.” David, what part of “take, eat; this is my body” and “drink … **this is my blood” **is a suggestion? Did Jesus command us or not? If we do not follow these commands can we go against scripture and say we truly love Jesus?

No part of that is a suggestion, but it is a command to believe not to eat and drink in the literal sense. I don’t see how that is going against Scripture. The command about communion is to remember. Remember the sacrifice. Do this. Take communion as a remembrance of the sacrifice I am about to make for you.

If there is no transubstantiation, then would the old covenant be greater than the new? The manna for the Egyptians came from heaven; the manna Protestants eat comes from the church secretary.

Let’s not be overly dramatic. The hosts that priests use are purchased just as any other communion wafers can be purchased in a Family Christian Bookstore. They are ceremonially blessed by a priest, but they are the same type of wafer.

The new covenant was not signed at the Last Supper. It was signed on Easter Sunday when the stone rolled away, and Heaven forever triumphed over Hell. The blood with which the new covenant was signed was shed on Good Friday. I became a beneficiary of that new covenant the moment I accepted Christ as the Son of God who died for the forgiveness of my sins – forgiveness that I cannot achieve or earn on my own. A forgiveness that is made available to me in full upon my acceptance of Christ – not in incremental amounts each time that I take communion.

Finally, did you realize that scripture directly or indirectly supports everything the Catholic Church teaches on the holy Eucharist? Can a Protestant say the same?

Yes, a Protestant can. I think I’ve been relying on Scripture for what I’m saying.

I see how scriptures say it does matter to Jesus; therefore, it matters to me. As for me and my house we are going to eat His body and drink His blood. Come join us.

If “it” is communion, I agree 100%. If “it” is transubstantiation, I don’t agree. I encourage you to continue to take communion every Mass.

My brother, Dave, please take courage and see how scripture supports what the Catholic Church really teaches.

I do see where the doctrine comes from. I just don’t agree, and that disagreement does not jeopardize my relationship with Christ.

May the Good Shepherd lead to you the bread of life.

He already has! Thanks for the encouragement! :cool:

God :blessyou:
 
40.png
jimmytoes:
This one has me wondering. First Communion at age 3? In the USA?
What’s the source for this? :confused:
I think it is saying that she is 12, the accident happened when she was 3. She has not eaten solid food for the past 9 years, only Holy Communion (for the last 4 or 5 years)
 
David Brent:
Is it possible that the bread and wine are just symbols?
Of course. They have certain symbolic meanings up to the words of Consecration. After that point they in substance no longer exist except in appearence. What St. Thomas calls accidents.
 
David Brent:
It was symbolism. Nothing more. Just as He’d done with His parables, Jesus was explaining about Himself and the sacrifice He was about to make of Himself by way of the example of bread and wine.
What He said in the parables is the opposite of what He said at the Last Supper. In the other examples He says that He is the **vine, **He is the door, He is the **gate, **etc. At the Last Supper He says, “This IS My body” He does NOT say This bread is my body, He does NOT say I am the bread, or this bread is Me. He says: This that you see is no longer what you see. It is in reality my body. He does not call it or refer to it as bread at the Last Supper. It may look, smell, taste like bread but it is not, this is in reality My body, which cannot be shown ordinarily to the senses, but only received in Faith. Just like the disciples who only saw a man, but in reality were in the presence of God all those years, their senses fooled them.
 
40.png
RichSpidizzy:
Eamon, I want to be like you when I grow up… And I’m 7 years older than you! :eek:

That was eloquently worded, and I thought you should be commended on you knowledge of the Faith. You don’t see that much amongst people your age. Did you have good religious instructon growing up, or are you more self taught?
Why thank you. 🙂 Well, I can’t say I received the most effective Catechesis when I was younger. I learned the history side of the Church in my religion classes at school (Loyola High), and my faith I really put an effort toward learning it in more recent years(with much help from my gf and her family, they are awesome!). I kinda thought about it starting sophomore year, and finally began to more actively pursue my faith at the beginning of this school year. It just took reading, prayer, and reflection. Thanks again.

Eamon
 
David Brent:
Are we having fun yet?

I’m a bit surprised that you would say that you wouldn’t waste you time to honor the One who gave His life for you unless He gave you something in return.

I don’t get your “egotistical” comment…You don’t have to swallow a communion host to gain access to Him. He’s sitting there waiting for you to call on Him at any time wherever you are!
Actually, I am having a blast. I love Apologetics. This is one of those activities that I sincerely enjoy. 🙂

I do not mean to say that I would not waste my time honoring God if He didn’t give me something in return. I’m saying that, without the Eucharist, I do feel that some of my time could be better spent than at Church by reflecting on my own (no offense to the priest who says most of the Homilies at weekday Mass, but they are a bit light-weight). I would rather read a good religious book, or pray all four sets of Mysteries of the Rosary. I would rather spend time in prayer in my way. I expect nothing in return when I pray my Rosary nightly; I meditate on the Mysteries out of respect. I spend that time thanking God for what I have. And, I don’t ask for things that I can control, I ask for the strength to do my part in them, and that is slightly less tangible than Eucharist. However, there is a certain requirement that I receive Jesus, and I make that a huge part of my faith.

My comment on egotism was to say that although God is always there and I can always pray and grow in my relationship with Him, I can sincerely receive Him by receiving the Eucharist. I can make a decision to pray when I choose, but only God can take bread and turn it into Himself. That is not something that I can do alone in my prayer time. So, while I do already spend a good portion of my day praying, this is an integral part of my faith. It was a matter of showing that I feel that no matter what I do, God is steering the boat.

Eamon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top