H
HiWell, he could be Catholic, as I would also agree that Jesus is fully God and fully Man and that the Holy Spirit is not part of God. The Holy Spirit is God.
However I think this may be what you meant he was denying. If this person also denied the Divinity of the Father he may be some sort of Unitarian (believing in one God existing as one Divine person.) If he believes that God exsists as only two Divine Persons, The Father and the Son, he may be something between a Trinitarian and a Unitarian. I’ve never heard of a name for this so I’ll call it Binarianism.
This is the teaching of Jesus.Hi
I think this is all confusion and blind faith, and has got nothing to do with JesusYeshuaIssa. It is a teaching of Paul, not of Jesus.
Thanks
famdigy, I am not offended by your question – it is a natural one, and any Christian who does not think it is one and condemns a non-Christian for asking it does not appreciate the mystery of the Incarnation and the Trinity.how can Jesus (a) be fully God and fully man at the same time.
please don’t get offended as I’m only asking the question from my observation.
If you think about it God is an independent being, i.e. He is independent from any internal or external elements. On the other hand man is a completely dependent being. Man’s physical survival depends on his body parts like lungs to breath oxygen, kidneys to filter blood, food to nourish the body etc…etc…
Hello,I thought god is god and jesus is jesus. So, are you saying jesus is really god? I read this on another site.![]()
This is the teaching of Jesus.
John 10:30 “I and the Father are one.”
John 14:11 Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me;
John 17:5 And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began
John 8:58 Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you, before Abraham came to be, I AM.”
If someone denies the Trinity, they would not be Christian.
Well, he could be Catholic, as I would also agree that Jesus is fully God and fully Man and that the Holy Spirit is not part of God. The Holy Spirit is God.
However I think this may be what you meant he was denying. If this person also denied the Divinity of the Father he may be some sort of Unitarian (believing in one God existing as one Divine person.) If he believes that God exsists as only two Divine Persons, The Father and the Son, he may be something between a Trinitarian and a Unitarian. I’ve never heard of a name for this so I’ll call it Binarianism.
Oh no, not you. I mean “you” as in general.Hello,
To whom are you addressing?
Most certainly NOT me!
I believe in the Triune God Not some heresy.
Hidoes not appreciate the mystery of the Incarnation and the Trinity.
We believe Jesus’ accepting a humiliating human death in order to save humankind from sin is the ultimate act of God’s love for us.
Pax tecum, Paarsurrey!Hi
I humbly disagree with the above points. I have several times requested my friends here to kindly let us know all the mysteries of the Catholic faith:
Such thoughts are, as far as I think, brain working of some theologians, not of Jesus, to give some sort of sanctity for these irrational creeds having no origination from OTBible.
- Authenticated by the Church with references
- with straight passages from the OTBible from where these has been formulated/originated
- with supportive reasons derived from the OTBible
The DivineGuide, the PromisedMessiah 1835-1908 has explained away that Jesus did not die on Cross, which is the central pillar of all such creeds, by reading his book ‘Jesus in India’ this pillar is removed and all such creeds crumble down with logical reasons and arguments:
alislam.org/library/books/jesus-in-india/index.html
Kindly concentrate on this single point for solution of all so called Christian mysteries, which are in fact no more mysteries.
I am not a scholar, I am a sinful humble person, others could differ with me with reasons.
Thanks
HiPax tecum, Paarsurrey!
The “Mysteries of the Catholic faith” cannot all be authenticated in the Old Testament because they stem from the teachings of Jesus and His chosen Apostles, to whom he gave authority to teach His word. Any time there is a “development of doctrine” (really just a refinement of our understanding of the nature of God) coming from theologians and the Magisterium it is all done through the Apostolic Authority given by Jesus to the Apostles and passed down through the generations.
The nature of Apostolic Succession, I would think, should not be difficult for a person of the Islamic faith to understand, after all, you point out that the reading of the text Jesus in India debunks all of Christianity’s claims. However, that text was NOT written by Muhammad, but instead by “Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, The Promised Messiah and Mahdi
Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam” (quoted from the link in your post above).
Please explain (I admit I am mostly ignorant of Islam) the significance of Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his position as Promished Messiah and Mahdi . From where does his authority to claim that Jesus was ever in India come and from where does he get his authority to teach in the Islamic tradition?
Once this is answered, I think, we shall be able to make some headway into mutual understanding of our differing faiths and the “Mysteries” behind them.
Pax Domine sit semper tecum!
Likely, he is an Arian who also denies the deity of Christ, Jehovah’s Witnesses and Christadelphians both come to mind.What kind of chrisitianity is this?