It is.This is an interesting answer.
So, this would actually be a test of the legitimacy of the faith.
If this scenario really happens, then Christ’s did not keep his word, and Christianity is not worth a penny.
It is.This is an interesting answer.
So, this would actually be a test of the legitimacy of the faith.
So the laity have no apostolic power under any circumstance? Are you sure of that?No, problem not solved.
If all bishops were wiped out, apostolic succession ends. It would be impossible to elect a new Pope and ordain new priests. Since the hypothetical also called for the elimination of all priests too, that means outside of Baptism and marriage, the Sacraments cease as well.
Therefore, in the hypothetical, the problem cannot be solved. The Church will collapse.
In order for the Church to survive any kind of disaster, we need at least one surviving bishop.
Your asking questions that have no basis in reality.
No. God will not let that happen. Any Catholic man may be elected pope. Once he is pope, he would be ordained by popular acclamation–at least I believe that’s how it would work. Of course, this would be the most extreme case of popular acclamation, but I believe it’s possible. The Holy Spirit would confer on the one so acclaimed ordination by the will of the people of God, but only in such an extreme case.No, problem not solved.
If all bishops were wiped out, apostolic succession ends. It would be impossible to elect a new Pope. Since the hypothetical also called for the elimination of all priests too, that means outside of Baptism and marriage, the Sacraments cease as well.
Therefore, in the hypothetical, the problem cannot be solved. The Church will collapse.
Correct, and I am sure. This is de fide Church teaching, and is not subject to negotiation. The only sacramental powers the laity possess are those of Baptism and Matrimony, and then, only under extraordinary circumstances. In all other cases, the laity cannot validly confer sacraments. They cannot absolve, they cannot consecrate the Eucharist and most certainly cannot ordain. No, no no. Period. No.So the laity have no apostolic power under any circumstance? Are you sure of that?
It could survive the aftermath but only for a time. Without the Sacraments, especially the Eucharist, there is no way the Church can ever survive.Surely the body of Christ would survive, no?
Yes, yes, we know this will not happen because the Church is indefectible. But the question is hypothetical and so the answer is also hypothetical. The hypothesis is: All bishops and priests are wiped off.No. God will not let that happen. Any Catholic man may be elected pope. Once he is pope, he would be ordained by popular acclamation–at least I believe that’s how it would work. Of course, this would be the most extreme case of popular acclamation, but I believe it’s possible. The Holy Spirit would confer on the one so acclaimed ordination by the will of the people of God, but only in such an extreme case.
Our system of having candidates from our cardinals is not set in stone. It’s just how things have played out–for practical reasons. We currently use that system as a form of Church governance, but such disciples can change.
I would have complete trust in a popularly elected pope, if were to come to that because Jesus promised he would not leave us and that the Church would survive until he returns.
It would be good to have an expert answer this question, though–if any read this thread and are interested in replying.
Well, not all of us are so sure as you are, my friend. You may be misinterpreting just who does and who doesn’t have the necessary authority in such a case.Correct, and I am sure. This is de fide Church teaching, and is not subject to negotiation. The only sacramental powers the laity possess are those of Baptism and Matrimony, and then, only under extraordinary circumstances. In all other cases, the laity cannot validly confer sacraments. They cannot absolve, they cannot consecrate the Eucharist and most certainly cannot ordain. No, no no. Period. No.
Again, it’s not “glaring obvious” or we wouldn’t be having this discussion. And it’s perfectly sound apologetics to cites sources, if any exist. There’s no need to be defensive.And no, I will not cite a source. This is so glaringly obvious and basic this should not even be subject to argument.
The Church has and does exist in areas with no ordained clergy, so that’s not a convincing reply. Baptism may be conferred by anyone, and marriage may be witnessed by non-ordained where none are available, both of which ensures the Church, as the people of God cannot be totally destroyed.It could survive the aftermath but only for a time. Without the Sacraments, especially the Eucharist, there is no way the Church can ever survive.
I wouldn’t say indefectibility in this case. I can’t see the connection. Perhaps you mean indestructibility?This is why we have the promise of indefectibility.
I’m not sure that what you are saying is true. An election of a Pope from the laity may very well be a sign of Christs promise, that so long as the faith survives in one person the gates of hell will not prevail.Correct, and I am sure. This is de fide Church teaching, and is not subject to negotiation. The only sacramental powers the laity possess are those of Baptism and Matrimony, and then, only under extraordinary circumstances. In all other cases, the laity cannot validly confer sacraments. They cannot absolve, they cannot consecrate the Eucharist and most certainly cannot ordain. No, no no. Period. No.
And no, I will not cite a source. This is so glaringly obvious and basic this should not even be subject to argument.
It could survive the aftermath but only for a time. Without the Sacraments, especially the Eucharist, there is no way the Church can ever survive.
This is why we have the promise of indefectibility.
Nope. The Laity cannot elect a Pope.I’m not sure that what you are saying is true. An election of a Pope from the laity may very well be a sign of Christs promise, that so long as the faith survives in one person the gates of hell will not prevail.
But in theory the holy spirit could elect a priest, a bishop, a pope etc. We are talking about God.
Indefectibility IS indestructibility. It is one of the properties of the Church, alongside infallibility. The Church has the divine promise that it will never be destroyed.Well, not all of us are so sure as you are, my friend. You may be misinterpreting just who does and who doesn’t have the necessary authority in such a case.
Again, it’s not “glaring obvious” or we wouldn’t be having this discussion. And it’s perfectly sound apologetics to cites sources, if any exist. There’s no need to be defensive.
The Church has and does exist in areas with no ordained clergy, so that’s not a convincing reply. Baptism may be conferred by anyone, and marriage may be witnessed by non-ordained where none are available, both of which ensures the Church, as the people of God cannot be totally destroyed.
I wouldn’t say indefectibility in this case. I can’t see the connection. Perhaps you mean indestructibility?
What I am saying IS true; it is your position that has no foundation in Scripture or tradition. The Pope is Bishop, and only Bishop ordains Bishop. This is the Catholic faith and a matter of divine, not ecclesiastical law. The Church has no power to change it.I’m not sure that what you are saying is true. An election of a Pope from the laity may very well be a sign of Christs promise, that so long as the faith survives in one person the gates of hell will not prevail.
You are also saying indirectly that Gods power is bound up in the established priest hood alone. But in theory the holy spirit could elect a priest, a bishop, a pope etc. We are talking about God.
So you are saying the holy spirit cannot elect a Pope from the laity?Nope.
Cannot happen.
And second - again there will be no such question anyhow -for this is a question not founded in reality. The reality is Christs word.
We know he will not. What he WILL ensure is that one bishop remains alive to either become Pope or ordain a Pope,.So you are saying the holy spirit cannot elect a Pope from the laity?
will not happen. you would never have every single Cardinal or every single bishop in one place at one time. There are always some bishops who are too old or sick to travel. The remaining Cardinals (even if over 80) would elect/appoint a new Pope.Is there a Contingency Plan in place?
Would the faith survive and in what theological state would it continue?
If the faith survived, how would we choose a new pope and priests and who would have the responsibility for doing so?
But the point is, that he could. The question is then why would that be against Catholic teaching if the entire preist-hood was wiped out?We know he will not. What he WILL ensure is that one bishop remains alive to either become Pope or ordain a Pope,.
Christianity would live on as it always has. By the looks of things, according to some posters, Catholicism would be dead.The Catholic Church may not survive, for reasons many of you expressed, but what of Christianity? It may well be that the community of faith would carry on quite well. God forbid any of this happens, but there are many Christians who are not Catholic.
Because we have to consider that God, out of nothing else but his sovereign will, ordained certain things to be done a certain way, and he did not give the Church the power to do anything else any other way. God ordained that the Church would be hierarchical and would transmit the faith through a sacramental system which includes Holy Orders and Baptism. God has ordained that Holy Orders would be transmitted in an apostolic succession, and no other manner. The Church has accepted this mandate as God’s sovereign design, and he promised the continuation of the Church on this model.But the point is, that he could. The question is then why would that be against Catholic teaching if the entire preist-hood was wiped out?
Your argument only follows given the existence of the priesthood. If at some point they failed to exist, i don’t see why that would mean that God’s promise was a lie.