G
goout
Guest
Start here:Lucy_1:![]()
This is an interesting point. Maybe there is something about the way in which the natural law is violated which makes it either a necessity to violate it (like self-defense), as opposed to a desire to violate it.Wouldn’t killing someone be part of the natural law?
At any rate, I think there is also something to be said for the fact that man, or the Church, has to define what natural law is, and, what is and is not a violation of it, or a disorder of it. So there is some inherent room for error there.
Human beings have a right to exist and flourish. Killing per se is not necessarily immoral if it’s done to protect someone else. The point of your killing is to protect the right of someone to exist and flourish.
Taking innocent life is another story.
Morality is not about prohibitions per se. You have to identify the good the prohibitions serve.