… That said, perhaps some of the functions would be seen as difficult. Many women like to talk, to share. Would it be more difficult for them to offer the Sacrament of Reconciliation? How would men feel about receiving guidance from women (especially on sexual issues)?
This has rustled out a thought I had about the OP question.
If the Gospel and the Truth are different for women and for men, then neither women or men would be qualified, would they?
The constant nagging for women priests SAYS that the male priesthood is flawed, or presumes it to be flawed.
Which leads to the question, what would the Gospel look like with the woman’s touch? Or, to be more direct, what are we supposedly missing?
We all have a duty to support evangelization, as Pope JPII and now BXVI have reminded us.
In his book, Jesus of Nazareth, the Pope brings out that the Sabbath is narrowly interpreted as being a day of rest. More broadly, it is a day for praise and worship of God. And, counting backward in Genesis, creation of woman to be a partner of man, we also sometimes narrowly construe in just the procreative aspect, instead of looking at it as the perfect way for human worship of God.
The woman carried the seed of all future generations, so even with Eve, from a Christological standpoint, she was the original ark of the covenant, bearing the seed of Christ. So, it was not without her that the work of creation was done and the worship of God was made at least humanly perfect. And the verse about the seed of Eve supports this view of her role, the New Testament hidden in the Old.