If you are good in math, then

[Padilla7921]

Physics is at the top.

If you aren’t smart enough for Physics, then try Math.

If you aren’t smart enough for Math, then try Computer Science.

If you aren’t smart enough for Computer Science, then go into Philosophy.

Actually, fractals are at the top (link directs to wikipedia article).

The article does it moderate justice, but there are other, more specific fractal articles that will help you understand why.

And I don’t necessarily agree with the idea that philosophy is less than science. The first scientists were philosophers who simply used the “new” empirical thought process to discover the realities of the physical world.

Since John Locke (the Father of Empiricism), there has been a noticeable separation between scientists and philosophers. Really, however, science and philosophy go hand-in-hand. Also, math is the underlying logical behind everything in the physical world.

 

[Chaldean_Rite]

Das ist falsch.

It is equal to e^i+pi + , a complex number. (A complex number is one that exists, but isn’t on the number line)

Used to be called “imaginary numbers”, but they are real enough to have useful applications.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_identity

 

[The_Barbarian]

If you accept Euler’s argument that 0 is on the complex number line.

Which I suppose it is. It is the intersection between the real and the complex number lines.

 

[Chaldean_Rite]

If you accept Euler’s argument that 0 is on the complex number line.

Which I suppose it is. It is the intersection between the real and the complex number lines.

That is one way to look at it, but still incomplete. Its a fundamental axiom:

Identity element of addition There exists an element 0 ∈ V, called the zero vector, such that v + 0 = v for all v ∈ V.

 

[cpayne]

See, this is why mathematicians hardly ever get invited to parties.