C
CatholicGearSolid
Guest
Actually, I referred to a stronger clue in verse 15:
“and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings which are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.” (…)
If Timothy knew these scriptures from his childhood, that means only one thing:
Paul can only be talking about the Old testament, which was the only Scripture present back then: Paul didn’t had the N-T in mind when making that statement.
So, following this context:
The protestants declare (without knowing) that the O-T is “sufficient”. By this logic, the N-T isn’t useful at all.
(notice how the Bible doesn’t even say “sufficient”, but uses words such as “profitable”: therefore not complete)
Protestant contradictions and confusions at its best,
yet verses like these are the foundation of their belief system.
“and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings which are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.” (…)
If Timothy knew these scriptures from his childhood, that means only one thing:
Paul can only be talking about the Old testament, which was the only Scripture present back then: Paul didn’t had the N-T in mind when making that statement.
So, following this context:
The protestants declare (without knowing) that the O-T is “sufficient”. By this logic, the N-T isn’t useful at all.
(notice how the Bible doesn’t even say “sufficient”, but uses words such as “profitable”: therefore not complete)
Protestant contradictions and confusions at its best,
yet verses like these are the foundation of their belief system.
Last edited: