If you don't believe in Purgatory....

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcoPolo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And Jesus gave the keys of heaven to just one Apostle to be the Cheif Apostle.
If Jesus gave the keys to Peter, then I suppose Peter would have been preaching a false doctrine to the gentiles if it hadn’t been for Paul.

How could Paul know better than Peter if Peter had the keys? The reason… the Gospel to the gentiles was committed to Paul… NOT Peter. Peter went on to preach to the Jews and Paul went on to preach the Gospel to the gentiles as per their agreement.
 
2Pe 1:1
Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ:

Again all Apostles are servants, yet not all servants are apostles.
 
If Jesus gave the keys to Peter, then I suppose Peter would have been preaching a false doctrine to the gentiles if it hadn’t been for Paul.

How could Paul know better than Peter if Peter had the keys? The reason… the Gospel to the gentiles was committed to Paul… NOT Peter. Peter went on to preach to the Jews and Paul went on to preach the Gospel to the gentiles as per their agreement.
**Jesus did not give any keys to Paul. How was Peter teaching a false doctrine to the Gentiles? **
 
NO, you would appear before God with a basket full things you think matter.
How do you know this? I think what matters is God’s grace. Period.
No, it isn’t. It’s a declaration of your unbelief in what God said… that faith in the blood of Christ was sufficient. You’ve decided to believe in a man-made idea that water can wash your sins away.
I have pointed to the many Scriptural passages that say just this. You have provided absolutely no Scriptural support for your dismissal of baptism. You keep saying things are “Scriptural” but have no Scripture on your side. “Scripture” to you means “what I think.”
True believers have always existed. Religion has been working overtime to wipe them out. So my point is why use Luther? He’s not the builder of my faith.
Luther invented the idea of imputed righteousness. No one taught it before him. And yet Luther didn’t think it contradicted the view that grace is given in baptism. Of course you don’t have to agree with Luther–I only cite him as an example showing that sola fide and baptismal regeneration are compatible.
No they aren’t. No matter how much YOU say so. The Word doesn’t say that. The Word says for by Grace are you saved THROUGH Faith.
We don’t disagree on that. And if you had the slightest desire to listen or have a real discussion you would know that already. You have produced absolutely no evidence that faith and baptism are somehow in competition. Scripture never says it. Scripture says that we are saved by grace through faith, and it says that we are buried with Christ through baptism, baptized for the remission of our sins, etc. Many of us have no trouble putting these two things together. You are creating an artificial difficulty that does not exist in Scripture, simply as an excuse for dismissing the clear Word of God regarding the nature of baptism.

In Christ,

Edwin
 
You are not a servant in the same context.

Tts 1:1
Paul, a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the faith of God’s elect, and the acknowledging of the truth which is after godliness;

All apostles are servants, yet not all servants are apostles.
Yes, Jesus gave authority to His SERVANTS.
 
Mar 13:34
[For the Son of man is] as a man taking a far journey, who left his house, and gave authority to his servants, and to every man his work, and commanded the porter to watch.
The context here is referring to the Apostles not disciples and servants in general.


 
How do you know this? I think what matters is God’s grace. Period.
Grace is offered to ALL in Jesus Christ. What matters to God is your faith. You will be rewarded with eternal life if you only believe the promise that God made to us through His Son.

Gal 3:22
But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

Hbr 11:6
But without faith [it is] impossible to please [him]: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and [that] he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
I have pointed to the many Scriptural passages that say just this. You have provided absolutely no Scriptural support for your dismissal of baptism. You keep saying things are “Scriptural” but have no Scripture on your side. “Scripture” to you means “what I think.”
We can start another thread on baptism. John baptized with water UNTO repentance. Jesus baptizes us with the Holy Spirit.
Luther invented the idea of imputed righteousness. No one taught it before him. And yet Luther didn’t think it contradicted the view that grace is given in baptism. Of course you don’t have to agree with Luther–I only cite him as an example showing that sola fide and baptismal regeneration are compatible.
Luther didn’t invent that idea. The Word of God teaches imputed righteousness. Luther wasn’t the first. Don’t forget there were the Waldensians.
We don’t disagree on that. And if you had the slightest desire to listen or have a real discussion you would know that already. You have produced absolutely no evidence that faith and baptism are somehow in competition. Scripture never says it. Scripture says that we are saved by grace through faith, and it says that we are buried with Christ through baptism, baptized for the remission of our sins, etc. Many of us have no trouble putting these two things together. You are creating an artificial difficulty that does not exist in Scripture, simply as an excuse for dismissing the clear Word of God regarding the nature of baptism.

In Christ,

Edwin
Did John the baptist EVER wash away sins?
 
Grace is offered to ALL in Jesus Christ. What matters to God is your faith. You will be rewarded with eternal life if you only believe the promise that God made to us through His Son.
Yet…

Rev 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

Rev 20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them:** and they were judged every man according to their works**.

**There is not one mention of being judged by one’s faith. As James wrote, “Faith without works is DEAD!” **
 
Rev 15:3 And they sing the song of** Moses the servant of God**, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvellous are thy works, Lord God Almighty; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints.

Yet you would cede that Moses was the LEADER.
 
Yet…

Rev 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

Rev 20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them:** and they were judged every man according to their works**.

**There is not one mention of being judged by one’s faith. As James wrote, “Faith without works is DEAD!” **
John was looking into the future… This future is the time when the Kingdom is going to be restored on earth. Those who have died “in Christ” will have their names already in the Book of Life. Only those who died with Biblical faith in Christ. Their rewards will be according to their works. Works of love not merit. Faith without works (of love as taken in context) is dead.
 
Rev 15:3 And they sing the song of** Moses the servant of God**, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvellous are thy works, Lord God Almighty; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints.

Yet you would cede that Moses was the LEADER.
God gave Moses the Law. They weren’t obeying Moses… they were obeying God.
 
We can start another thread on baptism. John baptized with water UNTO repentance. Jesus baptizes us with the Holy Spirit.
So when Peter told the people to be baptized for the remission of sins, that didn’t involve water? When Ananias told Paul, “Arise, and be baptized, and wash away your sins,” that didn’t involve water? This makes no sense.
Luther didn’t invent that idea. The Word of God teaches imputed righteousness.
No, it doesn’t. Romans 4 says that Abraham’s faith was imputed to him for righteousness. It does not say that Jesus’ righteousness is imputed to us, which is what Luther said.
Luther wasn’t the first. Don’t forget there were the Waldensians.
The Waldensians did not teach imputed righteousness.
Did John the baptist EVER wash away sins?
I was not talking about John’s baptism, although I wouldn’t give an unequivocal “no” to your question–he baptized people unto repentance for remission of sins, so clearly baptism played some role in the forgiveness of their sins. But we aren’t talking about burial with Christ, etc., when we talk about John’s baptism.

Deal with Acts 2:38; deal with Acts 22:16; deal with Romans 6. I’m not basing my argument on John the Baptist.

The point is that your false dichotomy between faith and baptism is contrary to Scripture.

Edwin
 
John was looking into the future… This future is the time when the Kingdom is going to be restored on earth. Those who have died “in Christ” will have their names already in the Book of Life. Only those who died with Biblical faith in Christ. Their rewards will be according to their works. Works of love not merit. Faith without works (of love as taken in context) is dead.
Yes faith without works is dead no matter what form the works take. Works of Merit can be Works of Love and vice versa.
 
Yes faith without works is dead no matter what form the works take. Works of Merit can be Works of Love and vice versa.
I agree with you, but I think believers’ point was that works not motivated by love do nothing to vivify faith (or, in Protestant terms, works not motivated by love are no evidence of living faith and may be produced by a false, dead counterfeit of faith).

Edwin
 
I agree with you, but I think believers’ point was that works not motivated by love do nothing to vivify faith (or, in Protestant terms, works not motivated by love are no evidence of living faith and may be produced by a false, dead counterfeit of faith).

Edwin
Thanks Edwin. Believers is under the mythcomception that Catholics believe the Works mentioned here mean Meritorius Works Alone. 😦
 
Originally Posted by believers forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif
God gave Moses the Law. They weren’t obeying Moses… they were obeying God.
A Question Believers. or maybe a few…

God gave Moses the Law?

I had always believed that GOD gave the Law to his Chosen People.

Why does GOD not just give the law directly to his Chosen People?

Why did GOD go thru an intermediary?

For that matter, why do you need a Pastor or Preacher at your local church?

Is not GOD powerful enough to sheperd the flock directly from Heaven without any intermediaries?
 
John was looking into the future… This future is the time when the Kingdom is going to be restored on earth. Those who have died “in Christ” will have their names already in the Book of Life. Only those who died with Biblical faith in Christ. Their rewards will be according to their works. Works of love not merit. Faith without works (of love as taken in context) is dead.
For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his WORKS . Matt 16:27
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top