I'm an SSPX'er, ask me anything!

  • Thread starter Thread starter TLMguy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
why is this a rule, given that only clergy can be members of the sspx church, not the congregation who are still members of the latin rite
There is a diocesan approved convent of cloistered sisters nearby, who invite laity to attend some Masses at their chapel. They post dress codes for those who attend, even those laity who have no connection to that Order. Likewise, the SSPX religious order can post dress codes for laity, all of whom are technically visitors. This is the rule for shrines, too, who invite visitors, with the presumption those people already have a regular faith community, with their own pastor, somewhere else.

Theoretically, the SSPX chapel can claim it is not schismatic, since it has no REGULAR congregation of its own, just people from the area who happen to visit, but that those laity are still under the jurisdiction of their own pastor and bishop. The reality is that the laity in our local chapel apparently do not really belong to any parish, and apparently are not involved in what should be their own diocese. Their defacto parish is the chapel, and the priest there, unlike the priest at my nearby convent or shrine, is not under the bishop. He is not really under any bishop ordinary at all.

In effect, a governing structure set up for religious orders is the SOLE makeshift parish and diocese for laity, an inadequate arrangement in Rome’s view.
 
Last edited:
people from the area who happen to visit, but that those laity are still under the jurisdiction of their own pastor and bishop.
How about SSPX attendees who have never been initiated into a diocesan parish church? Folks like the OP who were born and raised in the movement?

Does the SSPX report baptisms and other sacraments to their attendees’ parishes and dioceses, so they can be properly recorded?
 
Just so everyone knows: I was born into an SSPX family. I feel a lot of Novus Ordo Catholics who become affiliated with the SSPX carry a lot of bitterness with them. (for me, I didn’t even know the Novus ordo EXISTED until I was like 13! lol) Feel free to ask me anything. I do my best to defend my position, but please understand I’m not a Cannon lawyer or a Theological expert. I was inspired by the “I’m Orthodox, ask me anything” topic to create this.

(And please try not to derail this thread into firestorm 😉)
My question is, what is your conception of unity?
What is it? How is it attained? Who does it involve? Who’s work is it?
 
Yeah, well, the new “fad” on CAF is to flag posts not for being obnoxious or rude, but for having a different point of view than the flagger.
 
The question is not just whether it is a separate juridical, but rather a separate de facto denomination.

Suppose the SSPX chapels functioned like shrines, with visitors who still related to their actual pastor and active membership in their parish community, and diocese. Then, no one would say it is a defacto separate denomination. But I think it really is.

To put it another way, it is much closer to being a defacto separate denomination than it was 40 years ago, now that hardly any clergy have worked anywhere outside SSPX, and many laity have grown up now n chapels.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top