L
lonegreywolf20
Guest
That’s not what the Catholic church says. The Catholic church says once baptized Catholic you will always be Catholic.
That may be. However, you spend the rest of your life with Catholic family members telling you you are something you are not. It can be problematic.Meh, if you dont believe in Catholicism, then the baptism is a meaningless ceremony. Kind of reminds me of the Mormons posthumously baptizing Anne Frank.
If they were telling me that, then I wouldn’t be spending any time with Catholic family members, period. I have no problem setting boundaries. I would rather the few who can’t help themselves would just mind their own business when it comes to religious beliefs of those who believe differently from them.Would you rather spend the rest of your life with Catholic family members telling you you are going to Hell?
So, there are two ways to communicate that message.I have been told countless times that I am going to hell by my own family.
My take is that it’s ok to judge behavior, but not persons (or, more to the point, the state of persons’ souls)…So with the above verse in mind, yes, judgement can come from within the church and that includes from it’s members.
So, my take is that “to judge” means to say “this one’s going to heaven” or “that one’s going to hell.” That’s how I understand Jesus’ statement.That is not my take on it based on the whole verse.
Maybe, but it’s also the ‘Catholic’ answer.This seems a rather authoritarian bullying approach.
My late father was Catholic and my mother, now Catholic, was a Protestant when they married. She remembers being questioned by the priest who would later be the Celebrant of their marriage. One of the questions she was asked concerned the religious upbringing of any children God might bless them with. She had no problem agreeing to raise their future children in the Catholic faith.
That was the way that the question was asked prior to 1983. It’s not asked that way now, so… no – it would not have been settled.was the marriage done sacramentally (inside the RCC)? If so, then marriage to a non-Catholic would have required paperwork where this issue would had previously been settled in favor of raising the children as Catholics.
Yep. Today’s Catholic marriage prep does (or is supposed to) bring up the issue. But it is left to the couple to settle things on their own --which, in reality, was what had been happening all along.That was the way that the question was asked prior to 1983. It’s not asked that way now, so… no – it would not have been settled.![]()
Right. We’re just no longer requiring the non-Catholic spouse to potentially lie in order for the wedding to happen.But it is left to the couple to settle things on their own --which, in reality, was what had been happening all along.