Im Episcopalian and I was invited to a Catholic Baptism...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Casey123
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
There are some Orthodox Churches that would not give Communion to me, if their priest knows that I am a Catholic. What do I do? Will I be insulted? No, not at all. It is their prerogative and their rule.
Nearly all Christians recognize holy Baptism as valid regardless the denomination. Lutherans are not rebaptized if they become Roman Catholic and visa versa. The concern over the Eucharist is merely instructional since Lutherans and Catholics both believe in the Real Presence.

Clergy are too busy shepherding their flock.
 
Nearly all Christians recognize holy Baptism as valid regardless the denomination. Lutherans are not rebaptized if they become Roman Catholic and visa versa. The concern over the Eucharist is merely instructional since Lutherans and Catholics both believe in the Real Presence.

Clergy are too busy shepherding their flock.
Baptism and Eucharist are two separate Sacraments. There are seven Sacraments in the Catholic Church. I suggest you study these first and then make your remark. I mean it will save the explanation.

Baptism is valid if there are matter and form. Matter being water and form being the Trinity formula. In theory, anybody can be baptized by anybody and the Baptism is valid.

The concern over the Eucahrist from Catholic point of view, I have explained. Their celebrants are deemed not recognized by the Catholic Church as having valid apostolic succession. That makes their mass invalid. Second point as explained by Lily M, Catholicism regards Communion as also communion of belief and with Rome. You have to understand this. We, your church and mine do not share the same belief in doctrines and we are not in communion with each other.

How about if a Catholic asks you. What real presence? How about if a Catholic will to say to you that there is no real presence in a Protestant mass? Rightly or wrongly, this is the contention.
 
Nearly all Christians recognize holy Baptism as valid regardless the denomination. Lutherans are not rebaptized if they become Roman Catholic and visa versa. The concern over the Eucharist is merely instructional since Lutherans and Catholics both believe in the Real Presence.

Clergy are too busy shepherding their flock.
The clergy would shepherd their flock far better by teaching them the truth - which is, as the Church teaches, that there are presently insurmountable disagreements preventing the different denominations from being in true and full communion with each other, and hence making intercommunion meaningless.

Rather than pandering to hurt feelings. What if your Catholic relatives were instead Hindu or Buddhist but expressed equal hurt at not being able to commune? Why should the feelings of a Catholic or Anglican matter more than those of non-Christians?
 
Baptism and Eucharist are two separate Sacraments. There are seven Sacraments in the Catholic Church. I suggest you study these first and then make your remark. I mean it will save the explanation.

Baptism is valid if there are matter and form. Matter being water and form being the Trinity formula. In theory, anybody can be baptized by anybody and the Baptism is valid.

The concern over the Eucahrist from Catholic point of view, I have explained. Their celebrants are deemed not recognized by the Catholic Church as having valid apostolic succession. That makes their mass invalid. Second point as explained by Lily M, Catholicism regards Communion as also communion of belief and with Rome. You have to understand this. We, your church and mine do not share the same belief in doctrines and we are not in communion with each other.

How about if a Catholic asks you. What real presence? How about if a Catholic will to say to you that there is no real presence in a Protestant mass? Rightly or wrongly, this is the contention.
My point is pragmatic and what unifies. To dissect the faith as a way to reject others doesn’t sound Christian. I understand the sanctity of the Mass and the faithful reverence to guard the elements of Christ, the reserve sacrament, from those who would willingly abuse or denigrate that which we consider the most holy thing on earth. But those who seek our Lord, rejoice in His saving grace, beg His forgiveness and taste His heavenly Host can not be denied. No man can separate God from others.
 
My point is pragmatic and what unifies. To dissect the faith as a way to reject others doesn’t sound Christian. I understand the sanctity of the Mass and the faithful reverence to guard the elements of Christ, the reserve sacrament, from those who would willingly abuse or denigrate that which we consider the most holy thing on earth. But those who seek our Lord, rejoice in His saving grace, beg His forgiveness and taste His heavenly Host can not be denied. No man can separate God from others.
No, but men can separate themselves and others from God by playing fast and loose with the sacraments - and truths about those sacraments - that He has entrusted to them in the interests of a false ecumenism that amounts to the grave error of indifferentism.
 
But those who seek our Lord, rejoice in His saving grace, beg His forgiveness and taste His heavenly Host can not be denied. No man can separate God from others.
You don’t seem to get it, do you? A Catholic would ask you, what heavenly host you are talking about? Is it to be found in a Protestant mass? This may be blunt, but he would think that you do not have the heavenly host in a Protestant mass. Receiving something purported to be heavenly host but which one believes is actually not, then it is truly a sacrilege and a blasphemy.

Well, Catholics believe that the host is found in a Catholic mass but yet receiving this host is a communion with the Lord whereby one must be in a state of grace which can only be achieved through the Sacrament of Reconcilialtion of the Catholic Church. If one has not done this regardless whether you are a Catholic or a Lutheran, one also cannot receive Communion. So how can you expect a Protestant to receive Communion under this circumstance?
 
You don’t seem to get it, do you? A Catholic would ask you, what heavenly host you are talking about? Is it to be found in a Protestant mass? This may be blunt, but he would think that you do not have the heavenly host in a Protestant mass. Receiving something purported to be heavenly host but which one believes is actually not, then it is truly a sacrilege and a blasphemy.

Well, Catholics believe that the host is found in a Catholic mass but yet receiving this host is a communion with the Lord whereby one must be in a state of grace which can only be achieved through the Sacrament of Reconciliation of the Catholic Church. If one has not done this regardless whether you are a Catholic or a Lutheran, one also cannot receive Communion. So how can you expect a Protestant to receive Communion under this circumstance?
I would word it thusly:

“Well, Catholics believe that the host is found in Christ but yet receiving this host is a communion with the Lord whereby one must be in a state of grace which can only be achieved through the Sacrament of Reconciliation of the Church. If one has not done this regardless whether you are a Catholic or a Lutheran, one also cannot receive Communion. So how can you expect a Protestant to receive Communion under this circumstance?”

There appears to be an effort to deny Christ which is very perplexing.
 
I would word it thusly:

“Well, Catholics believe that the host is found in Christ but yet receiving this host is a communion with the Lord whereby one must be in a state of grace which can only be achieved through the Sacrament of Reconciliation of the Church. If one has not done this regardless whether you are a Catholic or a Lutheran, one also cannot receive Communion. So how can you expect a Protestant to receive Communion under this circumstance?”

There appears to be an effort to deny Christ which is very perplexing.
Study the Catholic Sacraments first. It may help you.

I did not say Sacrament of Reconciliation of the Church. I say Sacrament of Reconciliation of the Catholic Church. You can claim what you like, but sorry, it is Sacrament of Reconciliation of the Catholic Church. You may have one in your church but sorry we do not believe in your sacrament.

A Protestant cannot receive Sacrament of Reconciliation in the Catholic Church because he/she is not Catholic. I was saying regardless whether you are Catholic or Protestant because without going for this Sacrament (for Catholics) you may not be in a state of grace and Protestants cannot go for Catholic Sacrament of reconciliation by virtue of him being Protestants.

If you so much as to want to receive the Catholic Sacraments, you have to be Catholic. That is the prerequisite.
 
Mass is God coming to us and offer His most holy body and blood for all who believe. Once the words of institution are said, the very presence of Christ is physically among us. We kneel in awe, transported to the Upper Room with the holy apostles. A person cannot be considered Lutheran or Catholic unless he fully believes in this sacramental Union with our Lord.

That unity with Christ in the Eucharist is what is important for all catholics [Roman, Eastern, Anglican Lutheran].
Please don’t put out wrong information. We don’t have open Communion in the Catholic Church. Anglicans and Lutherans are not in communion with us and a priest is not allowed to give them Communion except under very limited conditions, with the bishops approval, and only if their own pastor is unavailable.
 
My point is pragmatic and what unifies. To dissect the faith as a way to reject others doesn’t sound Christian. I understand the sanctity of the Mass and the faithful reverence to guard the elements of Christ, the reserve sacrament, from those who would willingly abuse or denigrate that which we consider the most holy thing on earth. But those who seek our Lord, rejoice in His saving grace, beg His forgiveness and taste His heavenly Host can not be denied. No man can separate God from others.
The Church’s teaching on this is very clear. See the Catechism, paragraphs 1400-1401:
Ecclesial communities derived from the Reformation and separated from the Catholic Church, "have not preserved the proper reality of the Eucharistic mystery in its fullness, especially because of the absence of the sacrament of Holy Orders."239 It is for this reason that, for the Catholic Church, Eucharistic intercommunion with these communities is not possible. However these ecclesial communities, "when they commemorate the Lord’s death and resurrection in the Holy Supper . . . profess that it signifies life in communion with Christ and await his coming in glory."240
When, in the Ordinary’s judgment, a grave necessity arises, Catholic ministers may give the sacraments of Eucharist, Penance, and Anointing of the Sick to other Christians not in full communion with the Catholic Church, who ask for them of their own will, provided they give evidence of holding the Catholic faith regarding these sacraments and possess the required dispositions.241
We should not profess a Christian unity that does not, at this time, actually exist. Catholics should not receive communion at non-Catholic churches (since we don’t believe they have a valid priesthood, and thus, no valid Eucharist). Non-Catholics should not receive at a Catholic Church, if nothing else, out of respect for our beliefs along these lines.

We also believe, as Catholics, that you must not be in a state of mortal sin before receiving. Since we have no reason to think that a non-Catholic would know and believe this, or would avail themselves of the Sacrament of Penance (with a validly ordained priest), we do not permit them to receive out of concern for them as well. Obviously Catholics can violate this rule, but we hope/expect that they know better, while we have no such expectation of those who are not Catholic. See 1 Corinthians 11 28:31:
Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died. But if we judged ourselves truly, we should not be judged.
I understand and respect your view…as a Methodist for many years, I held the same view. But I hope that you will also understand and respect the Catholic view on this as well. If you have experienced Catholics who practice differently, they are out-of-step with our actual doctrines on this topic – perhaps unintentionally, yes, but that doesn’t make them ‘right’ and the Church teaching ‘wrong.’

When we cannot receive Communion due to sin or disunity with the Church, we should take the opportunity to make a spiritual communion and pray for the eventual TRUE unity of the Church when we all can share the Sacrament together.

God bless you!
 
Yes I am painfully aware that Lutherans can also deny Christ. For example, at my Dad’s funeral service, the LCMS pastor wrote in the Liturgy notes that anyone else must see him before Mass. Who is going to have time to speak with the priest before a requiem mass? What priest has time to question every worshiper? My Roman Catholic family members felt insulted that they could not commune since the Mass was essentially identical to their own parishes and they very much wanted to partake of the holy Meal.

We become one with our Lord when he is present. Do you think Jesus even considers affiliation? Everyone who communes receives Christ’s holy Body and Blood.
It sounds as though your Roman Catholic family members were poorly catechized since they should have know that the Catholic Church does not allow communion in non-Apostolic churches.
 
To the OP, if before the baptism, you feel the desire and need to take communion, and you hold the Catholic understanding of the sacraments you can always approach the priest and ask if you can receive. Depending on your particular circumstances he may allow you to receive. A Baptism with a Mass is one of the most common times that a person would request this special case.
 
Wow! Well I certainly didn’t expect such a lengthy religious and philosophical debate!

To the person who said that a baptism and a mass aren’t usually one in the same, I have an answer for you, if you are interested: This coming Sunday, there will be a mass, followed by the baptismal ceremony; so while they aren’t one in the same, I am attending both with my family. 🙂

As for the ensuing debate, I do my best to respect the traditions of all faiths and religions. I had actually planned on receiving until I read up on what to expect in a Catholic mass, and learned of the protocol that said that non-Catholics should refrain from the Eucharist, and wanted to know from the very knowledgeable people in these forums if there were any other traditions that I should respect, as well. I would do the same if I were in a Baptist or Pentecostal Church. If I were visiting a Mosque, for example, as their guest and was asked to remove my shoes or to respect another of their traditions, of course, I would follow it as best I could.

Respect is something that (at least in my area), I find that is lacking when it comes to situations like these, and I try to live the values that I preach. I may not be Roman Catholic, but as a guest in a Roman Catholic Church, I will respect their customs and traditions to the best of my ability - both because I am not there to offend anyone, merely to celebrate a momentous and happy day with my family, and also because I was raised to be polite and respectful. I would never go into another person’s house as their guest and not follow their rules, and I believe that principle should apply to houses of worship, as well.

Thank you all for an interesting debate, though! It was very thought-provoking to read and I learned quite a bit! I’m very much looking forward to the baptism on Sunday, especially now that I have a better idea of what to expect. This thread has made me feel quite comfortable and very welcome in advance of the ceremony on Sunday.

Thank you all and may God bless all of you with happiness and health,
Casey
 
Don’t actually sing any hymns or even touch the hymn book. You will get funny looks.
 
This idea that Catholic’s never sing during the liturgy is a myth. At every Catholic parish in which I have been a member the congregation have sung with full voice and we have had up to four choirs of parishioners of various ages for the Sunday masses. For example my last parish had different choirs for the Saturday evening vigil at 6pm, then a separate choir each for the Sundays Masses at 7am, 9am, 11am and 5pm.
 
[if] you hold the Catholic understanding of the sacraments you can always approach the priest and ask if you can receive. Depending on your particular circumstances he may allow you to receive…
As I understand it, if you do this, you’re putting the poor priest ‘on the spot’ as he technically needs his Bishops approval and even then it’s only supposed to be for the gravest of emergencies - as I understand Catholic teaching.

I’d refrain from doing it - especially if they offer a blessing. In some Catholic churches, watch to see if you see people coming up with their arms crossed their chest - this indicated that they want a blessing.

Even the individual blessing is technically not quite with Catholic teaching according to some, so I’d look to see if it’s the practice first.
 
As I understand it, if you do this, you’re putting the poor priest ‘on the spot’ as he technically needs his Bishops approval and even then it’s only supposed to be for the gravest of emergencies - as I understand Catholic teaching.

I’d refrain from doing it - especially if they offer a blessing. In some Catholic churches, watch to see if you see people coming up with their arms crossed their chest - this indicated that they want a blessing.

Even the individual blessing is technically not quite with Catholic teaching according to some, so I’d look to see if it’s the practice first.
ben, you could be a Catholic with such good grasp of Catholic practice.😉

As for the first paragraph, priests are quite clear on not giving Communion to non-Catholics (except for Orthodox) but yes, depending on the priest, he may be on the spot if he is such a nice person who does not want to disappoint you.

As for the second point you are spot on, pun unintended. The blessing is not that important whether it is given during the Holy Communion or by the Communion Ministers. This is more of a practice. Theoretically no blessing is necessary during the Communion and if there is, it should be given by the priest. It does not always happen like that way though. So it is good to look around first if the church does blessing during the Communion. If not, do not fret as everybody will get a general blessing at the concluding rite.🙂
 
Wow! Well I certainly didn’t expect such a lengthy religious and philosophical debate!

To the person who said that a baptism and a mass aren’t usually one in the same, I have an answer for you, if you are interested: This coming Sunday, there will be a mass, followed by the baptismal ceremony; so while they aren’t one in the same, I am attending both with my family. 🙂

As for the ensuing debate, I do my best to respect the traditions of all faiths and religions. I had actually planned on receiving until I read up on what to expect in a Catholic mass, and learned of the protocol that said that non-Catholics should refrain from the Eucharist, and wanted to know from the very knowledgeable people in these forums if there were any other traditions that I should respect, as well. I would do the same if I were in a Baptist or Pentecostal Church. If I were visiting a Mosque, for example, as their guest and was asked to remove my shoes or to respect another of their traditions, of course, I would follow it as best I could.

Respect is something that (at least in my area), I find that is lacking when it comes to situations like these, and I try to live the values that I preach. I may not be Roman Catholic, but as a guest in a Roman Catholic Church, I will respect their customs and traditions to the best of my ability - both because I am not there to offend anyone, merely to celebrate a momentous and happy day with my family, and also because I was raised to be polite and respectful. I would never go into another person’s house as their guest and not follow their rules, and I believe that principle should apply to houses of worship, as well.

Thank you all for an interesting debate, though! It was very thought-provoking to read and I learned quite a bit! I’m very much looking forward to the baptism on Sunday, especially now that I have a better idea of what to expect. This thread has made me feel quite comfortable and very welcome in advance of the ceremony on Sunday.

Thank you all and may God bless all of you with happiness and health,
Casey
Very gracious of you and speaks volumes of your Christian example. In the Episcopal Church all Roman Catholics present are encouraged to partake of the most holy Sacrament.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top