I'm gay. How do I tell my parents?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kolya111
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Make them gay? I’ve been wondering how that would work? For the bulk of heterosexuals, that presumably is not achievable.
I agree that very few, if any, people can be made gay or straight. However, many parents do blame their son’s boyfriend for making their son gay if they find out about his sexual orientation by meeting his boyfriend. It’s an irrational belief and response, but it’s a response I think one needs to take into consideration when deciding how to come out.
 
I agree that very few, if any, people can be made gay or straight. However, many parents do blame their son’s boyfriend for making their son gay if they find out about his sexual orientation by meeting his boyfriend. It’s an irrational belief and response, but it’s a response I think one needs to take into consideration when deciding how to come out.
I think it’s been fairly well-established that trying to chance your sexual orientation is at best impossible and at worst emotionally harmful. That’s why I actually think the Catholic Church takes a much better stance on the issue than some of the Evangelical churches - it doesn’t say that gay people must make themselves straight or that their desires alone are evil, just that they need to practice chastity.
 
I’m still reading the thread and appreciate everyone’s continued advice.

The boyfriend is in no way responsible for making me gay, and is not the first person I have had contact with.
 
I think it’s been fairly well-established that trying to chance your sexual orientation is at best impossible and at worst emotionally harmful. That’s why I actually think the Catholic Church takes a much better stance on the issue than some of the Evangelical churches - it doesn’t say that gay people must make themselves straight or that their desires alone are evil, just that they need to practice chastity.
I totally agree. Unfortunately, though, there are some Catholics who treat homosexual orientation like it is a disease.
 
I’m still reading the thread and appreciate everyone’s continued advice.

The boyfriend is in no way responsible for making me gay, and is not the first person I have had contact with.
Kolya. For me, I find Protestantism very difficult to really accept. . . the whole “I (BIG, MIGHTY, ME) have condescended to Accept Jesus”. . . as if that mere person was on a par with God, making a judgment or purchase. (This “accept Jesus” thing can seem so often to be a kind of intellectual consumerism).

I find there are aspects of Catholicism which are not up for personal, self-aggrandizing, choice. There is a greater good to following the path, though, especially if you have learned (in my case) that the teachings hold enormous intellectual weight and power. . . just as understanding our world as a world of God’s creation is a higher intellectual understanding than the physical sciences view (to be sure, it incorporates that materialist perspective).

I say this to suggest to you to just take the church’s teachings as the church’s teachings and incorporate them into your life.
 
I totally agree. Unfortunately, though, there are some Catholics who treat homosexual orientation like it is a disease.
A disease is an abnormal condition that affects the body of an organism. It is often construed as a medical condition associated with specific symptoms and signs. Itmay be caused by factors originally from an external source, such as infectious disease, or it may be caused by pain, dysfunction, distress, social problems, or death to the person afflicted, or similar problems for those in contact with the person.

I am not surprised that some people treat homosexual orientation as a moral disease.
 
Kolya. For me, I find Protestantism very difficult to really accept. . . the whole “I (BIG, MIGHTY, ME) have condescended to Accept Jesus”. . . as if that mere person was on a par with God, making a judgment or purchase. (This “accept Jesus” thing can seem so often to be a kind of intellectual consumerism).
Let me guess, next you’re going to talk about us Catholics and how we “worship Mary”? (Or about the Orthodox and how they “worship pictures”?) :rolleyes:
 
Kolya, how would I want to be told? Bluntly and in person. Face to face, no big lead up, “Mom and Dad, we need to talk. I’m gay.”

I have 3 kids, one grown and gone and the other two are a teen and a pre-teen. My uncle was a gay man and a very loving and wonderful part of my childhood. I have thought much about what would I do and how would I respond if any one of my kids were homosexual.

Truth is, I’d be sad about the loss of future grandchildren of my own blood. I’d be hurt for my child, that he or she has such a hard row to hoe. I’d encourage a relationship with God. I’d pray. I’d love my child and be at least polite and courteous to my child’s partner unless said partner gave me a reason not to be. I’d ask they do not engage in physical affection while under my roof for visits or that they stay at a hotel if they just couldn’t go without intimacy. I’d probably ask a lot of questions and hope for honest answers. And that’s about it.
 
A disease is an abnormal condition that affects the body of an organism. It is often construed as a medical condition associated with specific symptoms and signs. Itmay be caused by factors originally from an external source, such as infectious disease, or it may be caused by pain, dysfunction, distress, social problems, or death to the person afflicted, or similar problems for those in contact with the person.

I am not surprised that some people treat homosexual orientation as a moral disease.
Well if you look at it that way you could say that all ‘sin’ is a moral disease. And as such, we are all diseased. Happy thought 😛
 
The boyfriend is in no way responsible for making me gay
Obviously your boyfriend didn’t make you gay.

As irrational as it is to think that one’s boyfriend made one gay, there are many parents of gay people who did just that when their son/daughter came out by introducing their boyfriend/girlfriend to their them. Those situations generally didn’t play out very well, which is why I recommend waiting for a bit after you come out to your family to inform them that you have a boyfriend. In those cases, their negative emotions about the coming out tend to be directed at the boyfriend and tend to last a long time. Otherwise, those emotions tend to go away after some time.

EDIT: This is a sad example of what can happen when the parents blame the boyfriend for making their son gay.

As a gay man with very religious Catholic parents, I generally advise people in similar circumstances to come out alone (without mentioning boyfriend/girlfriend) and give them up to a year to adjust, introducing the boyfriend/girlfriend to them sometime in the middle of that year. If they can’t make sufficient adjustments after about 12 months (such as allowing your boyfriend to be welcome in their home on the holidays like a girlfriend would), then it would be a good time to indefinitely cut them out of your life until they do come around.
 
Obviously your boyfriend didn’t make you gay.

As irrational as it is to think that one’s boyfriend made one gay, there are many parents of gay people who did just that when their son/daughter came out by introducing their boyfriend/girlfriend to their them. Those situations generally didn’t play out very well, which is why I recommend waiting for a bit after you come out to your family to inform them that you have a boyfriend. In those cases, their negative emotions about the coming out tend to be directed at the boyfriend and tend to last a long time. Otherwise, those emotions tend to go away after some time.

EDIT: This is a sad example of what can happen when the parents blame the boyfriend for making their son gay.

As a gay man with very religious Catholic parents, I generally advise people in similar circumstances to come out alone (without mentioning boyfriend/girlfriend) and give them up to a year to adjust, introducing the boyfriend/girlfriend to them sometime in the middle of that year. If they can’t make sufficient adjustments after about 12 months (such as allowing your boyfriend to be welcome in their home on the holidays like a girlfriend would), then it would be a good time to indefinitely cut them out of your life until they do come around.
I think that you made were intelligent suggestions except for the last point. Your final statement seems immature because it becomes a sort of blackmail. How would you feel if the parents were to say to a practising homosexual child not to show up anymore as long he has a partner. Would you suggest the same thing if the child were a junkie and he would try to bring his dealer along? I think that the OP should follow your first set of suggestions, they are very reasonable and sensitive.
 
BOProof;11450835:
If they can’t make sufficient adjustments after about 12 months (such as allowing your boyfriend to be welcome in their home on the holidays like a girlfriend would), then it would be a good time to indefinitely cut them out of your life until they do come around.
Your final statement seems immature because it becomes a sort of blackmail.
What you call blackmail I call reasonable conditions.

I would suggest the same thing for other situations in which an apples-to-apples comparison can be made. An example of such an apples-to-apples analogy would be if your parents welcomed all of their children’s boyfriends/girlfriends/spouses except yours simply because of your boyfriend’s race. Getting over that hangup enough to at least be welcoming to the boyfriend is a very reasonable condition to set in order to show up on holidays and other events.

If the parents are unwelcoming to one’s boyfriend/girlfriend/spouse for no reason other than race or gender (the latter of which could happen to kolya111), and is unable to make even minimal adjustments in a year, then it probably isn’t worth including them in your life beyond checking to see if they have made such improvements.
 
I would advise against telling them at Christmas.Christmas is very much about family, family happiness, family unity etc. and it is a time when people look back over the past and reminisce over past family events with fondness. To drop a bombshell like that on your mother at Christmas would, in my opinion, be quite cruel and selfish. Would you be doing it for her benefit at that time, or for your benefit?

If you really feel you need to tell them then perhaps tell them at a less significant time of year. Perhaps have a chat with your dad at some point at some ordinary time of the year and tell him. If the news is likely to hurt your mum the most then perhaps the news would be best coming from her husband. He knows her far better than you do, and it might be best if the news came from the person who knows her best. He might even decide that it would be better if she did not know about it, and as her husband it is probably better that he decides whether or not it is in her best interests to know this. I think that decision should be left to him.

Try to get past thinking that you want to do this because it is the best thing for you to get it off your chest and fully into the open. While this might be the best thing for you, is it really the best thing for your parents, particularly your mother? Ought we to do things primarily for our own benefit or for the benefit of others, particularly people such as our parents to whom we owe so much?
 
If they can’t make sufficient adjustments after about 12 months (such as allowing your boyfriend to be welcome in their home on the holidays like a girlfriend would), then it would be a good time to indefinitely cut them out of your life until they do come around.
That seems incredibly callous. Cutting one’s parents out of your life because they will not adjust to your own lifestyle, despite their own beliefs and conscience. Very selfish and very heartless.

So you’re right, they’re wrong, they have to ditch their faith, beliefs and be forced to act against their conscience, because you’re view on the total acceptability of homosexual relationships is clearly right, whereas their view is clearly wrong? They ought to ditch their conscience and go along with your view, because you say so, and if they don’t they get cut out of your life, until such time as they submit to your world view?
 
Cutting one’s parents out of your life because they will not adjust to your own lifestyle, despite their own beliefs and conscience. Very selfish and very heartless.
What is very selfish and heartless is to be unwelcoming to your child’s boyfriend/girlfriend simply because of race, gender, or any other equally stupid reasons. A son asking his parents to be at least minimally welcoming and charitable to his boyfriend, instead of being heartless, is a pretty reasonable request.

Side note: Dating someone of the same-sex is no more of a “lifestyle” than dating someone of the opposite sex is a “lifestyle.”
So you’re right, they’re wrong, they have to ditch their faith, beliefs and be forced to act against their conscience, because you’re view on the total acceptability of homosexual relationships is clearly right, whereas their view is clearly wrong?
I’m not even saying the parents need to accept the relationship as moral. I’m just saying the parents need to be minimally charitable enough to welcome the boyfriend on holidays and at family events (like they would a girlfriend).

It’s somewhat analogous to dating someone of a different race. If your parents have it seared into their conscience by their church that dating/marrying someone of a different race is immoral, you would at very least want them to put that disapproval on the back burner and be welcoming and charitable to your partner, even if you don’t seek to change those beliefs.
 
If your parents have it seared into their conscience by their church that dating/marrying someone of a different race is immoral, you would at very least want them to put that disapproval on the back burner and be welcoming and charitable to your partner, even if you don’t seek to change those beliefs.
It is not ‘seared into their conscience’ by the Church, as you put it. The Church does not brain-wash anyone, nor does it force anything upon anyone.

And you were not just advocating a charitable approach as one would extend to any of our fellow man, you were saying that the parents must accept a homosexual partner of their son, just in the same way as they would accept a heterosexual relationship, or even a spouse. You are also implying that to not do so would make the parent’s response akin to racism.

And if they do not comply with this that the son should cut them out of his life. His parents! The very people that brought him into the world and raised him, with all the love and sacrifice that that involves. Does the Commandment “Honour thy father and mother” count for nothing? Or is this Commandment conditional on the father and mother accepting a child’s homosexual relationship (despite the fact that to accept this relationship is to go against their consciences)?
 
There are an awful lot of people who find it highly offensive to have the color of their skin–a physical attribute–compared to a behavior, a deliberately chosen action.

How would you feel, BOProof, if the parents gave their son 12 months to adjust to their morality, beliefs, values, and expectations, and if he doesn’t, cut him out of their lives? Or is cutting someone out only a problem when a religious person does it, but perfectly okay when someone who agrees with your worldview does it?
 
The boyfriend is in no way responsible for making me gay, and is not the first person I have had contact with.
Understood. But you can understand how to your parents the boyfriend is the collaborator in your actions. Your parents love you, and believe in you as a good person, and don’t know the boyfriend from Adam. You can understand how they therefore may see the boyfriend as the one who led you into wrong acts. Now, that may be objectively wrong, indeed, you may have been the instigator, or you may each have taken an equal role.
But you can see how the parents are likely to be at first negatively disposed to the boyfriend. I hope you will bear this in mind if/when the time comes.
 
It’s somewhat analogous to dating someone of a different race. If your parents have it seared into their conscience by their church that dating/marrying someone of a different race is immoral, you would at very least want them to put that disapproval on the back burner and be welcoming and charitable to your partner, even if you don’t seek to change those beliefs.
What on earth are you talking about here? How does race feature in this discussion?

There is no analogy with race to be made here, because the debate at hand rests on what is a fundamental issue of moral truth, supported by everyday observation and science. Sexual relationships between members of the same sex make no sense. By all means, let same sex persons partner up for any other purpose, but not for mutual sexual pleasures. The race issue is an absolute red herring.

And as for the church searing anyone’s mind, what fiction are you reading? Consult the CCC, consult the writings of JP2 and you’ll find nothing of the kind. You’ll find exhortations to respect and compassion for all, but clarity on what is true and right.

And yes, the right thing for the parents to do is treat their son and his boyfriend with respect. That does not extend to endorsing the relationship or to facilitating it, or to celebrating it.
 
What is very selfish and heartless is to be unwelcoming to your child’s boyfriend/girlfriend simply because of race, gender, or any other equally stupid reasons. A son asking his parents to be at least minimally welcoming and charitable to his boyfriend, instead of being heartless, is a pretty reasonable request.

Side note: Dating someone of the same-sex is no more of a “lifestyle” than dating someone of the opposite sex is a “lifestyle.”

I’m not even saying the parents need to accept the relationship as moral. I’m just saying the parents need to be minimally charitable enough to welcome the boyfriend on holidays and at family events (like they would a girlfriend).

It’s somewhat analogous to dating someone of a different race. If your parents have it seared into their conscience by their church that dating/marrying someone of a different race is immoral, you would at very least want them to put that disapproval on the back burner and be welcoming and charitable to your partner, even if you don’t seek to change those beliefs.
No, comparing homosexual behaviors to dating someone from a different race is a logical fallacy and a cope out. Homosexual behaviors exist because of free while race is not because of free will. You did not answer my comment about the junkie and his dealer, do you think that the patents should be welcoming the pusher at their house because his drugs make their son feel good? Should the parents of a 14 year old accept her partner that is older than her father because they are in love? Should the parents accept a son that brings multiple partners to the holiday’s events because he is entrenched in polyamory? Sould the parents accept a son that goes around beating gay people just because they exists? All these are moral issues that a Catholic cannot accept, they can and should still love their child and be ready to die for him but they must reject those behaviors or they will participate into the sin. I have worked and I assume that I work now with gay people and I do treat them the same way of any other colleague, if they are good I push them for promotions,and if they are bad I try to mentor them. Of course sometimes they catch me off guard with their mannerism, but I have the same reaction for people from other cultures, the trick is to love them all and not to participate in sin, it is possible without seriously offending too many people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top