When Mary told Jesus, “they have no wine,” Jesus told her “my hour is not yet come,” yet he still performed the miracle. Just a good Jewish boy obeying his mama!

:thumbsup:
Yes…I’ve actually responded to this just a few days ago (I’ll repost it here):
**
John 1:V3 – 5 (Douay Rheims online)**
3 And the wine failing, the mother of Jesus saith to him: They have no wine.
4 And Jesus saith to her: Woman, what is that to me and to thee? My hour is not yet come.
5 His mother saith to the waiters: Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye.
While Catholics refer to the importance of Mary’s contribution in relation to Jesus’ first miracle….it is interesting to note that her request was a very “human” one – a very “motherly” one as it fulfilled the need of saving face for the host at a wedding banquet. To the average onlooker, how much more indicative would it have been of the holiness and abundance of grace she is supposed to have had at that time - if her request for this first miracle had been that of a perhaps a seemingly more purposeful one – that of healing a blind or crippled person perhaps… however, IMHO, the “setting” of the wedding feast and the miracle of changing the water into wine by Jesus has a symbolic meaning, as one commentary indicates:
“The water pots were provided for Jewish rituals of purification, such as the washing of hands before meals. The master of the feast was the one in charge of providing food and drink. The joyful good wine of the gospel has replaced the water of Jewish legalism.”
Gene Miller, M.Div.,Ph.D, Assoc Prof of NT – Anderson School ofTheologyAffiliated with CTT (Christian Churches Together) a ecumenical group of which the Catholic church is a member.
The main reason, for the mentioning of this first miracle, is not to draw attention to Mary or her ability of being able to get her son to do things for her because of her relationship to Him ….but to establish “the beginning of signs” – as stated further on in the chapter :
11 This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee; and manifested his glory, and his disciples believed in him.
Nevertheless….I do love how her understanding and faith had grown more by the time of this wedding and is evident in her expectancy of knowing that her son was able to do something about the situation at hand. I don’t believe that she herself knew of the “symbolic” meaning that could be drawn from this event ….but I do believe that Jesus was aware of it and that is why He complied to this request. In this respect, I can truly say that I can and always have identified with Mary and her love for her son and her understanding that she had of His capabilities at that moment in time. Mary’s humanness, if anything makes me respect and identify with her.
I just didn’t understand what was meant by how she “dealt” with Him? (as posted by Jeanne Francoise)… as if this translates into Mary “still having to deal with Him” in some way in order for our prayers to be answered. He is so approachable and available directly to each and everyone of us, if we “consecrate” ourselves wholey to Him and abide in obedience and faith.
Thanks for your (name removed by moderator)ut!
Peace and God Bless