M
MrZetterlund
Guest
I was watching a video from Kent Hivind, who I take no side with whatsoever, but he pointed to me somethingpuzzling in the Catechism:
"460 The Word became flesh to make us “partakers of the divine nature”:78 "For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God."79 "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God."80 "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."81
Uh… I I know we’re “gods” in the sense that we’re given a divine nature, but God Himself? I’m feeling kinda like I’m borderlining Mormonism, here.
Care to explain? Thanks. 
"460 The Word became flesh to make us “partakers of the divine nature”:78 "For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God."79 "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God."80 "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."81
Uh… I I know we’re “gods” in the sense that we’re given a divine nature, but God Himself? I’m feeling kinda like I’m borderlining Mormonism, here.