Priests aren’t supposed to be explicitly political, so no…
Considering what this hat is called and what it’s supposed to represent I’d say it’s inappropriate even without the political baggage.Priests aren’t supposed to be explicitly political, so no…
I’m not familiar with the hat, can you explain? (assuming you can explain without running afoul of forum language rules)Considering what this hat is called and what it’s supposed to represent I’d say it’s inappropriate even without the political baggage.
It is a kitty cat hat. Many of them were designed, knit/crocheted, to be worn for the Women’s March. It was a reference to the fact that kitties can be called pssy cats (thus the ‘cat’ ears) and that the term 'pssy’ was used by Mr. Trump (and other men) as a reference to women and a part of their body celebrated in the ‘V@gina Monologues’.I’m not familiar with the hat, can you explain? (assuming you can explain without running afoul of forum language rules)
Well if you click on the link, there is your photographic evidence.If there was not photographic evidence a priest wearing that hat during mass I would be hard pressed to believe it actually happened.
Thank you Tantum ergo for the explanation.
Yes, i saw the picture.Well if you click on the link, there is your photographic evidence.
Sorry, but if my priest did that, I would be changing parishes.
Well if you click on the link, there is your photographic evidence.
Sorry, but if my priest did that, I would be changing parishes.
sounds like a cute hat, associations asideIt is a kitty cat hat. Many of them were designed, knit/crocheted, to be worn for the Women’s March. It was a reference to the fact that kitties can be called pssy cats (thus the ‘cat’ ears) and that the term 'pssy’ was used by Mr. Trump (and other men) as a reference to women and a part of their body celebrated in the ‘V@gina Monologues’.
Crude.
Even without the political baggage, and if it were called something else, I’m pretty sure that wearing anything other than liturgical vestments at Mass is verboten. Doesn’t matter if it were a Dodgers cap, a top-hat, a WW1 Pilot’s helmet, a medieval Great Helm with full crest or a propeller beanie – it would still be not proper for the celebration of Mass.Considering what this hat is called and what it’s supposed to represent I’d say it’s inappropriate even without the political baggage.
Just to clarify, the Priest spread the picture himself by posting it on Facebook with public settings.It would be good to discuss the matter with the priest involved, the pastor, or the bishop. Additionally, you might warn others in your area regarding this priest, especially if they are pregnant or may become pregnant and you think they may seek his counsel.
However, we should be careful about spreading pictures like these to anonymous strangers online…I worry that perhaps it could border on detraction, though I have every reason to believe the OP had only the purest intentions in sharing this image.
I looked at his comments on the post and from what I can see, he is reasoning that he supports the Women’s March because of the other principles that they stand for, not their pro-abortion, pro-contraception stances.Just to clarify, the Priest spread the picture himself by posting it on Facebook with public settings.
Doesn’t matter. WHY he wore it has no bearing. The fact that he wore it or ANY hat that isn’t a Biretta, Mitre or Zuchetto in the context of Mass is the issue for me. The Mass is not the place for that. Were I a priest and I decided to wear my favorite fedora during Mass, I’d hope someone would call me on it.I looked at his comments on the post and from what I can see, he is reasoning that he supports the Women’s March because of the other principles that they stand for, not their pro-abortion, pro-contraception stances.