S
SeminoleGirl22
Guest
Ok i went and talked with my priest again like some here and suggested, and here is a quick summary:
i told him about what was going on, and he still asserts that i dont have a valid reason for anullment. (there are many factors involved)
so i asked "what if we have sex to help reconcile, i get pregnant, and he continues to act like he is God? what then?
by then i was crying, and a younger priest stepped in to see if everything was OK. my priest asked him what he thought and they sat there are argued canon philosiphy for 30 min:
OLDER Priest:-------------------
5) the marriage always comes first, even before children. so if sex could serve as part of the road to a reconciliation to prevent separation or divorce, it should be attempted.
Younger Priest:-----------------------
6) because after long periods (6 months for me) with no intercourse, the woman is more likely to ovulate as a result of the intercourse, and thus much more susceptable to pregnancy. Even if procticing NFP, the chances are substantially higher. so, the chances of having a child in an potentially “unstable” situation are higher, which could nullify the reconciliatory, unitive and required aspect of sex in marriage.
OLDER Priest:----------------------------
7) God intends pregnancy to happen when it happens. He wont give you more then you can handle, so skirting around His Will for marriage by refusing sex doesnt help things.
Younger Priest:--------------------------------
8) sex is meant to be mutual and loving, and cannot be abused by one partner as mindless recreation.
so 4 for, and 4 against basically. both of them came to the conclusion that there seems to be a “bug” in the situation, that is, any action taken can ultimately lead to a wrong/sin being committed in some form or another. neither of them have ever come across a situation like this before. im damned if i do, and damned if i dont.
they said they would consult with a doctor of the church. mind of i ask why a doctor is appropriate to bring into this? do they want to teach me super-NFP or something? im so confused.
i can have sex with him to help reconcile, but run the risk of possibly becoming pregnant. i can also not have sex with him and take the chance he will not change and become more distant, and possibly leave. either way, i lose.
i told him about what was going on, and he still asserts that i dont have a valid reason for anullment. (there are many factors involved)
- sex can be a powerful step and tool in reconciliation and bring the couple closer.
BUT---- - the unitive aspect should not be removed from sex, so if my husband just “uses” me because he wants sex, then it’s wrong.
HOWEVER— - Unless there is an intent to always have a Josephine marriage, sex is an expected part of marriage if both people are physically capable and there are no health consequences.
UNLESS— - if i feel uncomfortable with having sex with my husband, then the unitive aspect of the sex is lost, and having sex would be only to satisfy his desires.
so i asked "what if we have sex to help reconcile, i get pregnant, and he continues to act like he is God? what then?
by then i was crying, and a younger priest stepped in to see if everything was OK. my priest asked him what he thought and they sat there are argued canon philosiphy for 30 min:
OLDER Priest:-------------------
5) the marriage always comes first, even before children. so if sex could serve as part of the road to a reconciliation to prevent separation or divorce, it should be attempted.
Younger Priest:-----------------------
6) because after long periods (6 months for me) with no intercourse, the woman is more likely to ovulate as a result of the intercourse, and thus much more susceptable to pregnancy. Even if procticing NFP, the chances are substantially higher. so, the chances of having a child in an potentially “unstable” situation are higher, which could nullify the reconciliatory, unitive and required aspect of sex in marriage.
OLDER Priest:----------------------------
7) God intends pregnancy to happen when it happens. He wont give you more then you can handle, so skirting around His Will for marriage by refusing sex doesnt help things.
Younger Priest:--------------------------------
8) sex is meant to be mutual and loving, and cannot be abused by one partner as mindless recreation.
so 4 for, and 4 against basically. both of them came to the conclusion that there seems to be a “bug” in the situation, that is, any action taken can ultimately lead to a wrong/sin being committed in some form or another. neither of them have ever come across a situation like this before. im damned if i do, and damned if i dont.
they said they would consult with a doctor of the church. mind of i ask why a doctor is appropriate to bring into this? do they want to teach me super-NFP or something? im so confused.
i can have sex with him to help reconcile, but run the risk of possibly becoming pregnant. i can also not have sex with him and take the chance he will not change and become more distant, and possibly leave. either way, i lose.