I'm not a Catholic because

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I was once (agnostic in my case) - where you are right now and followed a similar path. I will absolutely pray that God helps you in your quest my friend!!!

PM me if you are ever interested in knowing what helped me eventually believe that God truly exists? 🙂
joe, I would love to hear your story. If you don’t want to go public, please PM me as well.

Thanks, 🙂
 
I’m not Catholic because I don’t believe in God. 🤷

BUT, if I could be convinced that God existed, I’m pretty sure I’d become a Christian And if I became a Christian,** I’d be a Catholic, because it seems to me the only faith that actually makes logical sense**.
It was the only logical choice for myself. To return to the Church.
 
"Why I’m not Catholic" Well, just for starters (since I could write you a mile long scroll worth of reasons): on the one hand, the Catholic Church says to Protestants, “Aw, c’mon back into the fold, Stray Brethren.” (We’ll ignore for the moment the condescension implicit in the label.) On the other hand, Trent’s anathemas still stand, and Trent is infallible dogma, right? It can’t be rescinded, right? So, then, I’m asking myself, what gives with this institution: have they forgotten their old documents (if so, how do I know they won’t resurrect them, once I join :eek:)? Or are they less than ingenuous, or…maybe they’re counting on us dumb stray sheep not to notice the discrepancy/contradiction (not to mention the condescension)?
What’s Trent’s anathemas?
 
What’s Trent’s anathemas?
This is from the decree on Justification.
CANON I.-If any one saith, that man may be justified before God by his own works, whether done through the teaching of human nature, or that of the law, without the grace of God through Jesus Christ; let him be anathema.
The Council of Trent can be found on many websites. The above is one. You can find the rest here…

history.hanover.edu/texts/trent.html

I often see dishonest Protestant sites, citing specific ones without all of them…to conclude their false premise. This is what the Catholic Church teaches and has taught…
 
Of course all assertions are not implicitly infallible. But do you not agree that some are? In matters of the physical universe, we have the scientific method and mathematics as our authorities to (in some cases) make infallible declarations regarding the natural world. In a similar sense, there are infallible declarations in the realm of faith and morals–we just have a different infallible authority is all. Also, just because you recognize your own fallibility does not mean that there is no such reality as infallibility.
I do not agree that the sciences and mathematics speak infallibly. To me, the word “infallible” means “incapable of error.” That is, if infallibility exists, then under at least some circumstances a person becomes incapable of making any mistake at all. I see no reason to think that anyone has ever had that property.

If Euclid’s Theorem stands unchallenged for all time, as I fully expect it will, that’s not because Euclid was infallible. It’s because, though fallible, he got it right. The theorem itself cannot be called infallible, because infallibility is a property of persons, not propositions. Scientists and mathematicians have gotten some things right and some things wrong. None of this shows that infallibility exists.
A couple things here. One, God did leave infallible teachings to humanity prior to the Church: in the form of both physical natural laws and the Natural (Moral) Law (again, Lewis’ Mere Christianity is excellent on this point). And two, the vast majority of the Church’s infallible teachings apply to Christ, who obviously wasn’t physically around for the vast eons of humanity prior to His arrival on Earth. So of course these Jesus-specific infallible teachings needn’t be there for the pre-Christ humans.
The laws of nature are observed universal regularities, not teachings. They don’t become teachings until people attempt to infer various things from them, and human inference is fallible. This includes inference from the descriptive laws of nature to prescriptive moral principles. And again, the expression “infallible teaching” is a category mistake. Teachings are not agents; they can’t fail at things. They can be right or wrong, correct or incorrect.
 
=shadowlily;8511840]I still don’t get it… but okay.
It means that the truth that they have been exposed to is inspired by God and that therefore it obligates all; everyone, W/O exception, and must be accepeted. Anyone who makes the freewill decision NOT too; will be judged by God as denial of God and denial of Gods Own truth.

There can logically be ONLY One single truth on every issue: This defined teaching IS THAT TRUTH.

They therefore commit themselves to eternal HELL IF they do not repent and convert [accept and live these truths as explained and defined]. 🙂

Hope this clarifies it for you?

God Bless,
Pat
 
It means that the truth that they have been exposed to is inspired by God and that therefore it obligates all; everyone, W/O exception, and must be accepeted. Anyone who makes the freewill decision NOT too; will be judged by God as denial of God and denial of Gods Own truth.

There can logically be ONLY One single truth on every issue: This defined teaching IS THAT TRUTH.

They therefore commit themselves to eternal HELL IF they do not repent and convert [accept and live these truths as explained and defined]. 🙂

Hope this clarifies it for you?

God Bless,
Pat
So… Trent was a Council, right? And the anathemas were like excommunication, when a Catholic gets officially kicked out so they’re not a part of the Church anymore?
 
***SURE THERE WAS AND IS: YOU JUST MISSED IT:)

Unlike Protestant servoces which cater to floowship and unity at the expese of WORSHIPING God; Mass is 1. From God [the Father] Of God [The Son] and By God [The Holy Spirit].

Eucharist; a Greek working meaning “thanksgiving”, has also a triune nature. At one and the same time it is a Sacrifice Sacrament [Thank you Jesus!], a Communion Sacrament where we participate in the most astounding and amazing unity with God by actually consumming His Glorified Body; blood, Soul and Divinity [the comeplete Jesus]; THANK YOU JESUS! and also a Worship Sacrament. Thank you Jesus.

Catholic Mass is [or ought to be] ALL about God! Fellowship is outside of the Mass and takes MANY forms that one can with little effort particiapte it. To give up the Real Presence and the Sacrament of Known forgivenness of sins to enjoy yourself is no excuse; much less a valid reason. In doing so one DOES put there eternal salvation at risk!:eek:

My friend it is not to late to REPENT and Revert!***

John.10: 16 “And I have other sheep, that are not of this fold; I must bring them also, and they will heed my voice. So there shall be one flock, one shepherd”

Eph. 4: 1-7 “I therefore, a prisoner for the Lord, beg you to lead a life worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all lowliness and meekness, with patience, forbearing one another in love, eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. There is one body [WHICH MEANS ONE CHURCH] and one Spirit, just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call, one Lord, one faith, [Meaning only One set of beliefs] one baptism, one God and Father of us all, who is above all and through all and in all. But grace was given to each of us according to the measure of Christ’s gift.[Always JUST and ONLY One God; One set of Faith beliefs [no option here], and One Church the ONLY one founded, guided and garded by jesus Himself [John15:18-19].

Eph. 2:19-20
“So then you are no longer strangers and sojourners, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, [singular] built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone, in whom the whole structure is joined together and grows into a holy temple in the Lord; [singular] in whom you also are built into it for a dwelling place of God in the Spirit.”

May God grant you wisdom, humility and TRUE understanding,
Pat
Pat, there was ZERO fellowship at the church I used to go to. I am not criticizing the mass itself. BUT…I need to feel a little valued when I go to a church. Like, maybe , it actually matters that I am there.
That is just me.
 
I still don’t get it… but okay.
When someone opposes the Church like Zwingli, Calvin, Knox, Luther…since they were all Catholic by their free will and since 3 of them were priests…they led people into other teachings that opposed the Church…

The Church decreed for the faithful truths so that those that may have been influenced by these guys could know that the Church did not agree…

Those, like these guys, that said things that opposed the Church were excommunicated and the Church said if you say such and such you are excommunicated in order for people to realize the gravity of these false teachings.

OK.
 
So… Trent was a Council, right? And the anathemas were like excommunication, when a Catholic gets officially kicked out so they’re not a part of the Church anymore?
They actually excommunicate themselves. If they correct their error then there is no excommunication…
 
=shadowlily;8512052]So… Trent was a Council, right? And the anathemas were like excommunication, when a Catholic gets officially kicked out so they’re not a part of the Church anymore?
Yes Trent which was called to specifically address the many issues and topics that Luther, Calvin, Smith and others were dispuiting and holding views that were [ARE] very un-Catholic needed to be stated in the clearest possible language. That is what Trent did; and why even today it may well be the most important and signifiant of all the past Councils. The BROAD range of topics covered in amazing.🙂

And yes; anyone not accepting these truths were in fact kicked out of the CC, and ought not call themselves Catholic anymore.:o They may nolonger particiapte in the sacraments unless as I stated they REPENT and Convert.

God Bless,
Pat
 
So… Trent was a Council, right? And the anathemas were like excommunication, when a Catholic gets officially kicked out so they’re not a part of the Church anymore?
Can a Protestant, regardless of denomination, get kicked out of the church to which they belong if they reject certain teachings?

If not then could I bring my catholic beliefs and introduce them to the flock, in a Protestant church, without the Minister or Pastor taking issue?

Just curious…
 
** There is much about Catholicism that I admire,** as I have repeatedly said.
Code:
**My principal problem is its claim to be infallible in all of its basic teachings. I was just reading the bio of Pope Benedict XVI that he himself has written**. Fascinating little diary-type book. I was interested in how, for example, various faculty members at his seminary years ago took issue with the doctrine of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary. They argued, among other things, that it hadn't appeared within the Church until the 5th century, that there is no evidence for it in scripture and that it was not embraced by the early Christians  However, once the dogma was proclaimed in 1950 by Pius XII those professors changed their tune overnight. The Church, they wre quick to admit, knew more than they did! They rushed to embrace 'the party line'.

 **Now, that represents rather well the main reason I have had to keep a distance from Catholicism.** Yes, I know the arguments. The Holy Spirit guides the Pope so that when he speaks ex cathedra he cannot err. I know, too, that to dissent is usually dismissed as egotism. But I simply can't give up my mind and even my conscience to go along just to go along. If the Church would only allow folks like me to be part of the Church without surrendering the freedom to think differently....well, I guess i"ve made my point.
** Obviously millions of people sren’t troubled by the limitations that Catholicism places upon freedom of thought and expression.** Mother Church, they believe, cannot be mistaken in matters of doctrine and morals. They aren’t troubled when, for example, Hans Kung is denied the right to teach in a Catholic university - Kung, one of the great theologians of modern times. That sort of lock-step requirement troubles me, and I believe it alienates many others. It also is ignored by millions upon millions of Catholics who continue in the Church while simply ignoring many of its teachings - ‘cafeteria Catholics’. Millions of others have left the Church because of their differences with the Magisterium.

** On the other hand, for those who are content with all this, fine. No criticism on my part. **However, I would be a hypocrite, a liar, and a phony to profess doctrines that I either doubt or reject. My refrain remains: believe in God, seek to emulate Christ, but ‘think and let think’. If we focus on what we believe in common, this tribal sectarianism, based more on loyalty to cult than unity of thought, would disappear and Christians could rejoice in a spirit of reconciliation and cooperation. I wonder if this is impossible because of our sin of pride, something we all wrestle with. “My Church is better than your church!”
Code:
  **Off on a tangent. **I was interested - was it on this thread? - that some poster reported that 88,000 Protestants had become Catholic in the USA in the past year. No surprise, especially if you count the many mixed marriages. But how many Catholics drifted from the Church into nothingness or even into some variety of Protestantism? Protestants don't keep such figures and it strikes me as a bit weird that Catholicism does. Sound slike Protestantism is the enemy??? I do know that Protestant churches around here have attracted many former Catholics - both mainline and evangelical churches.They never seem to focus on that.

** Let us make religion a bridge rather than a barrier**. God bless Catholics, Protestants and His children of every creed, color, culture and country. I'm sure the Lord isn't all that interested in our dogmas and liturgies. He checks out our hearts and how much love is in them for him and for one another. The rest is window-dressing. I keep repeating myself because I'm hoping that it will influence at least a few readers to give this emphasis on love over doctrine and liturgy serious consideration.
 
Hey Roy…
My principal problem is its claim to be infallible in all of its basic teachings. I was just reading the bio of Pope Benedict XVI that he himself has written.
So you believe that the holy spirit guided the apostles to teach and write infallibly, (in other words, guided them into all truth) - but do not believe that the holy spirit continued to guide the church, to which they belonged, into all truth upon their demise?

Of course Jesus checks out our hearts and how much love is in them for him and for one another! 👍

Were you just joking when you said: “I’m sure the Lord isn’t all that interested in our dogmas and liturgies” - or do you really view them as nothing more than “window-dressing?”

Perhaps I am missing something…:confused:
 
** Hi Joe370**

** If you are asking if I am a fundamentalist/literalist when it comes to scripture - no, definitely not**. There are many passages in the Bible that give me pause, starting at the very beginning with the stories of Adam and Eve, Noah and the Ark, and the Tower of Babel. I certainly don’t believe that the Lord sent two she-bears to maul 42 young people because they teased Elisha about his bald head (Ii Kings 33ff). Do you believe that? And I also consider it a slander against God to write that he ordered Joshua to murder all the inhabitants of Joshua or that he demanded that Saul slaughter every remaining Amalekite! Oh, and check out such verses as Ex. 22:20. Do you think we ought to execute all who follow other religions? Just killing the billion Hindus would involve horrendous (and evil) work. Or verse 18 which says we should kill ‘witches’. In medieval Europe and even in colonial America ‘good Christians’ insisted on doing that. I could go on and on and on. How could a loving, forgiving, compassionate God demand such wholesale vengeance and cruelty!? The answer? He didn’t and doesn’t! I would not worship such an unjust and wrathful god!
Code:
**When it comes to the New Testament**, I don't agree with Paul - for example - that women should keep silent in the churches - and I note that women often read lessons during Mass. I even have me doubts that Jesus cast demons into pigs which then rushed over a cliff. It's easy to misinterpret unusual events. It happens all the time. 

 **No, I certainly was not joking when I think that God doesn't consider our doctrines and liturgies that important.** When asked outright how to enter eternal life, he gave the parable of the Good Samaritan in response. Nothing about doctrine or liturgy in that. When he spoke quite specifically about the final judgement in Matt. 25:31ff, he again ignored doctrine and liturgy. Check it out.
** Tragically, much religion today, like that during the time of Christ, places far too much emphasis on correct dogma and proper and prissy ritual when Christ clearly focused on love.** So did Paul in I Cor. 13. Now abide faith, hope and love, and the greatest of these is love. Too often this gets lost when tribal loyalists try to play ‘gotcha’ when it comes to comparing beliefs and varieties of worship. A waste of time and a perversion of the message of Christ. In this world of perhaps a million solar systems we should stand in awe before our miraculous, magnificent and mysterious God and not think we really understand it. Let us live instead with a simple faith, respecting the views of one another, not emphasizing what divides us, but focusing instead upon the glory of the Almighty and the love Christ gave us to share with others.
**
God bless you and everybody else.**
 
Roy5;8513077]** Hi Joe370**
** If you are asking if I am a fundamentalist/literalist when it comes to scripture…**
Actually no. I asked:
So you believe that the holy spirit guided the apostles to teach and write infallibly, (in other words, guided them into all truth) - but do not believe that the holy spirit continued to guide the church, to which they belonged, into all truth upon their demise?
When it comes to the New Testament
, I don’t agree with Paul - for example - that women should keep silent in the churches - and I note that women often read lessons during Mass. I even have me doubts that Jesus cast demons into pigs which then rushed over a cliff. It’s easy to misinterpret unusual events. It happens all the time.

👍
No, I certainly was not joking when I think that God doesn’t consider our doctrines and liturgies that important.
:hmmm: Okay…👍
Tragically, much religion today, like that during the time of Christ, places far too much emphasis on correct dogma
Specific tenets or doctrines, authoritatively laid down by the church are unimportant to you? OK…
and proper and prissy ritual when Christ clearly focused on love.
Well, that’s kind of harsh considering the fact that many churches incorporate rituals…
A waste of time and a perversion of the message of Christ. In this world of perhaps a million solar systems we should stand in awe before our miraculous, magnificent and mysterious God and not think we really understand it.
Makes we wonder why Jesus said:

But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. He will glorify me because it is from me that he will receive what he will make known to you. All that belongs to the Father is mine. That is why I said the Spirit will receive from me what he will make known to you.”
Let us live instead with a simple faith, respecting the views of one another, not emphasizing what divides us, but focusing instead upon the glory of the Almighty and the love Christ gave us to share with others.
👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top