"I'm spiritual, but not religious."

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lepanto
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
thou shalt not covet thy neighbors goods”.

not even catholics are following that! coveting they neighbors goods is what drives the economy! 😃
:rolleyes:

Actually, the economy would do a lot better if people lived within their means and only bought the things that they really needed.

As I understand it, your current American recession was brought about by people who took out mortgages that they couldn’t afford, and went bankrupt because they couldn’t pay their debts.
 
Lepanto,

doing those things makes us feel good. makes me feel good. Because being moral is ingrained in our genes. its part of being a social animal. the survival of the human species depends on how we cooperate with each other. on how the individual helps build up the community.
 
Fornicators aren’t “moral people.”
you automatically equate condoms with fornicators. i think you are being too religious. 😃
Mother Mary, Queen of Heaven, anybody? 🤷
Quran anybody? You are so religious, the only religion you see is your own. 😃

*Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great. *

Moral standards, eh?
 
you automatically equate condoms with fornicators. i think you are being too religious. 😃

Quran anybody? You are so religious, the only religion you see is your own. 😃

*Men are the maintainers of women *because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.

Moral standards, eh?
Bait and switch, eh? :rolleyes:
 
Doesn’t look like you had any “takers”…I’d be interested as well.

IMO it’s the kind of answers we’ve read here that “put people off” on 'organized religion"…rude, sarcastic, often spiteful…not much that would entice anyone to look into “organized religion” for the most part.

In the Meeting I attend we get our share of “Seekers” who often use the same phrase of “being spiritual” but “not religious”…“not religious” usually carries a connotation very close to the responses we’ve made in this thread…not much in the way of displaying the “Spirit of Christ” or “love of God” toward others.

The writer of one of the letters of John said something about “How can we say we love God whom we have not seen, yet hate our brother whom we have seen?” IMO, this is the difference those who use that phrase “spiritual vs religious” is really trying to make…perhaps we should listen to them a bit more closely…we may learn more about ourselves than we want to…the “spiritual” vs the “religious” phrase is often a mirror not too many of really want to look into…IMO.
You are correct. :tiphat:
 
Doesn’t look like you had any “takers”…I’d be interested as well.

IMO it’s the kind of answers we’ve read here that “put people off” on 'organized religion"…rude, sarcastic, often spiteful…not much that would entice anyone to look into “organized religion” for the most part.

In the Meeting I attend we get our share of “Seekers” who often use the same phrase of “being spiritual” but “not religious”…“not religious” usually carries a connotation very close to the responses we’ve made in this thread…not much in the way of displaying the “Spirit of Christ” or “love of God” toward others.

The writer of one of the letters of John said something about “How can we say we love God whom we have not seen, yet hate our brother whom we have seen?” IMO, this is the difference those who use that phrase “spiritual vs religious” is really trying to make…perhaps we should listen to them a bit more closely…we may learn more about ourselves than we want to…the “spiritual” vs the “religious” phrase is often a mirror not too many of really want to look into…IMO.
Thank you for your response, but it appears to have no effect since the sarcasm and cynical remarks continues on this thread unabated.

It appears that some at least can be religious without being spiritual, mere rule followers but no spirit of love in observance of the rules.
  1. Much though he recites the sacred texts, but acts not accordingly, that heedless man is like a cowherd who only counts the cows of others — he does not partake of the blessings of the holy life. -Dhp 1
 
Matthew 15:8
'THIS PEOPLE HONORS ME WITH THEIR LIPS, BUT THEIR HEART IS FAR AWAY FROM ME.

spirituality is more important than religiousness. 🙂
 
thou shalt not covet thy neighbors goods”.

not even catholics are following that! coveting they neighbors goods is what drives the economy! 😃
This is a ridiculous statement. We do not covet what our neighbors own. Rather, we all seek to improve our own lives regardless of what our neighbors own.
 
Matthew 15:8
'THIS PEOPLE HONORS ME WITH THEIR LIPS, BUT THEIR HEART IS FAR AWAY FROM ME.

spirituality is more important than religiousness. 🙂
Those who refuse to submitt to God’s truth (in religion) honor God with their lips but their hearts are far from him.
 
Matthew 15:8
'THIS PEOPLE HONORS ME WITH THEIR LIPS, BUT THEIR HEART IS FAR AWAY FROM ME.

spirituality is more important than religiousness. 🙂
Actually, it’s the “spiritual but not religious” who are all talk and no action. To be “religious” is to be someone who acts on (religio) his or her spirituality.
 
Those who refuse to submitt to God’s truth (in religion) honor God with their lips but their hearts are far from him.
You should read your bible more. Jesus quoted that verse to attack the teachers of the Law (truth in religion).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top