Well those are some nice things, but lets not forget that Luther died before the Pope canonized the books, they were added after his death, not taken away by him, all he took out was indulgences, unless you still believe that you can get into Heaven by buying your way in?
Are you really suggesting that there was no Scripture prior to the Council of Trent? My friend, the Church determined what books to include in the canon back in Hippo in 393. Actually, Pope Damasus gave us the list of books at the Council of Rome in 382, the Council of Hippo and then the Council of Carthage (419) just confirmed this. The Church does not define truths unless errors abound on the matter, Catholic Christians looked to the Council of Florence, an ecumenical council in 1441 for the first definitive list of canonical books. However, it was unquestionable that between 382 and 1441 the ONLY recognized Christian Bible was in fact the one spoken of at Rome, Hippo, and Carthage. The final infallible definition of canonical books for Catholics came from the Council of Trent in 1556 in the face of the errors of the Reformers who rejected seven Old Testament books from the canon of scripture to that time. In other words, because these PROTESTers began tearing apart the Canon and throwing books out, the Church again stated what had already been accepted for over a thousand years and this time they did so with absolute infallibility.
I really don’t see a problem with what he did. Also, i never said they were apart of the Trinity, i said there not, thats why we don’t call Mary the virgin mary,
Strange, Luther did…
“It is an article of faith that Mary is Mother of our Lord and still a virgin.”
Martin Luther, Martin Luther’s Works, vol 11, pg 319
“Undoubtedly, there is no one so powerful that, depending on his own intelligence, without Scripture, he would maintain that she did not remain a virgin.”
Martin Luther, Martin Luther’s Works, vol 11, pg 320
" There can be no doubt that the Virgin Mary is in Heaven. How it happened we do not know."
Martin Luther, Martin Luther’s Works, vol 10, pg 268
"God has formed the soul and body of the Virgin Mary full of the Holy Spirit, so that she is without all sins, "
Martin Luther, Martin Luther’s Works, vol 52, pg 39
But to say that Martin took them out is just silly, it’s just not correct history, and iregardless of what was discussed before hand, Martin did not add or remove any of the discussed books, also the Vulgate, did not include the writings, you are mistaken they were not canonized because Jesus never quoted them, and the early “fathers” regarded them as uninspired. also the Douay Bible’s old testament was not finished until 1609, due to the fact that the writings were added by Pope Clement, its not the original Vulgate.
Is the world flat too? I’m sorry my young friend, there are copies of the Bible prior to the reformation and they DO IN FACT have the full canon as introduced at the council of Rome and then again at Hippo and Carthage. It’s silly to dispute what is already proven.
Once again, i honestly don’t care what you guys believe, all i brought up is that we shouldn’t disrespect each other.
Reread your 2nd post and tell me again that you are not being disrespectful.
…as far as who calls on the Lord and is saved, i don’t know i’m not God. And yes Jesus was a Man, but he is God first and after his life here, and i really don’t like paragraghs, Anyways, the message of the bible is clear, we all sinned, he came to say us. and no i don’t think that its my personal task to convert anyone, incase you forgot, you were the one who brought up who is right or wrong, not me, everything i was reading on this forum were posts by people such as yourselves slandering others, and i said we need to knock it off, but once again another foolish argument about Jesus when we believe the same thing about Jesus. as far as my post being different, I can’t ever recall, condeming anyone, and no my interpretation is not wrong, it just doesn’t include a padre’s oppinion and if you think everyone in Heaven is Catholic, i think you should ask your “padre”. because thats not the Jesus i know, or the Jesus I serve. So unless you guys can control your emotions and your mouths, you should probally go somewhere else and waste their time.
To save time, I’ll stop breaking apart this post and summarize my final thoughts on this err… last paragraph. Using words like “padre” in the context that you are using them suggests that you have nothing but contempt for Catholics… certainly not respect as you claim. Next, you my friend are on a Catholic website. And YOU are telling us (Catholics) to “go somewhere else?” You have got to be kidding me. LOL The only one whose emotions seem to be getting the better of them is yours as is evidenced by your inability to articulate your thoughts clearly and in acceptable English. You’re in such a hurry to cry out how wrong the teachings of the Church are, you can’t even take the time to use correct punctuation, capitalization, or grammar. LOL God bless you my little protesting friend.