C
CatholicSpirit
Guest
Regarding the Sacrament of Reconciliation: as I understand it, a person motivated to confess their mortal sins, but in doing so in that state of mind is more-less concerning a “fear of hell” rather than an apology to God reduces the sincerity of the contrition? With these rules, to be honest, it’s hard to figure out forgiveness at the end of the day. I always thought if you feel bad, notice mortal sins you’ve committed, attempted confession because of shame and fearing hell, you were in good standing. Then, there’s the part about repeating the offense, I get lost there. Say for example, you lied to your wife about where you went one night because she is neurotic (nothing bad, just trying to avoid a fight about stopping by a friend she doesn’t like’s house), so to save the marriage you made something up temporarily. And you are likely to lie to her again at some point, she’s a little “off” and maybe so are you. I still think the sacrament of reconciliation (for that first lie) is a great idea. Is that wrong? The last thing anyone wants to find out at the end of their lives there is some “that confession piece didn’t count buddy” mark near any attempts. Let me know if anyone sees where this average joe trying to get right with The Lord on doing stupid things is coming from. Also, of course it’s an apology and reaching out for some backup on various issues. Thanks in advance!
-CatholicSpirit-
-CatholicSpirit-