In heated debate with pro-choicers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephentlig
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Stephentlig

Guest
Hi guys, I am in a heated debate with pro-choicers.

can you provide me with proof that abortion is WRONG?

Scientific proof would be great and a good few qoutes from doctors.

God bless
your all in my prayers this evening
Stephen <3
 
Stephen,

You are putting the cart before the horse. I would think before getting into a “heated debate” with abortion proponents, you would have read a broad range of materials and formulated your own responses to pro-abortion assertions.

If you cannot articulate why abortion is wrong, then do some study before going back to any debating. Don’t ask others to do the research and produce answers for you. You have to do the heavy lifting yourself.

An excellent resource is Randy Alcorn’s book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments. There are numerous websites with good inforation as well, from Stand Up Girl to American Life League, and many in between. There are several pro-life atheist websites (google pro-life atheist). Feminists for Life has an excellent website. Priests for Life does too. www.omsoul.com has lots of literature.

And, also, know with whom you are debating. What types of evidence will they accept regarding the “wrongness” of abortion? Will they accept religious authority? Biological facts? Secular sources? What? The way in which you reason with an atheist may be very different from the way in which you reason with a Christian, or a Jew, etc.
 
What is the background of the people you are debating?

You may find some good resources by googling either of these groups:

Feminists for Life

Athiests for Life
 
I suppose its not that I cant handle it, just that I need a little bit of back up for what I say.

Your right though, never to get involved in a debate I know little or nothing about.
but what I do know I have stated so far in the debate and it seems to be working. 👍 I dont really think there is much to know when showing abortion is evil, its already evident to everyone that it is, so I cant see this debate lasting long.

its in the lords favour so far, but I still want some sites with plenty of backup and have it ready for any other replies I may receive.
I am dealing with atheist/agnostics in a secular forum.

The person in opposition so far is Female, and a non-believer.
Stephen <3
thank you for the slap on the hand I sure needed it, its important that when we are representing holy Mother Church that we do our best not to do her any injustice.

❤️
 
I suppose its not that I cant handle it, just that I need a little bit of back up for what I say.

Your right though, never to get involved in a debate I know little or nothing about.
but what I do know I have stated so far in the debate and it seems to be working. 👍 I dont really think there is much to know when showing abortion is evil, its already evident to everyone that it is, so I cant see this debate lasting long.

its in the lords favour so far, but I still want some sites with plenty of backup and have it ready for any other replies I may receive.
I am dealing with atheist/agnostics in a secular forum.

The person in opposition so far is Female, and a non-believer.
Stephen <3
thank you for the slap on the hand I sure needed it, its important that when we are representing holy Mother Church that we do our best not to do her any injustice.

❤️
Stephen, browse the site Physicians for Life here: physiciansforlife.org/content/view/380/48/

I am pointing to you to one of a zillion rebuttal argument pages. This is a great site with tons of detail.

This interesting recap comes from another page at the site here: physiciansforlife.org/content/view/77/48/
Until the 1970s, medical professionals, human rights groups, and birth control providers traditionally understood Human Life to begin at conception (also termed “fertilization”):
Hippocratic Oath. The ancient Greek Hippocratic Oath - for thousands of years the standard for Western medical ethics - was routinely sworn by doctors upon medical school graduation.
It states: “I will neither give a deadly drug to anyone if asked for it, now will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly, I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy.” This last sentence has now been deleted from most medical school commencement ceremonies.
American Medical Association. For 125 years, the American Medical Association took a firm anti-abortion position, declaring in 1859 that abortion is the “unwarranted destruction of human life.” In 1871, the AMA denounced doctors who would perform abortions as “false to their professions, false to principle, false to honor, false to humanity, false to God.” But, in 1989, the AMA called abortion a “fundamental right,” to be decided “free of state interference” in the absence of compelling justification.
World Medical Association. Partially in response to revelations of medical war crimes at the Nuremberg Nazi trials, the World Medical Association in 1948 adopted a new physician’s code, the Declaration of Geneva, which stated: “I will maintain the utmost respect for human life, from the time of conception.” This declaration was reaffirmed in the 1970 Declaration of Oslo.
The United Nations. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of the Child, adopted by the General Assembly in 1959, stated that a child “needs special safeguards and care, including appropriate legal protection, before as well as after birth.” This is reaffirmed in the 1990 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Planned Parenthood in 1963. Planned Parenthood insisted that the organization’s birth control campaign did not support abortion, stating: “An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun.”
California Medical Association. The California Medical Association, in 1970, declared abortion to be “killing” and referred to “the scientific fact, which everyone really knows, that human life begins at conception and is continous whether intra- or extra-uterine until death.”
And be not afraid. I resist the notion that to defend life in debate or argument you need a BS. The argument for life is completely rational, available to any honest intellect while the argument for abortion is irrational and illogical.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top