Benedict XVI, the pope emeritus, rejected the idea of being part of a rival power center within the Vatican, as some conservative critics of Pope Francis have hoped.
Very misleading title, given the context of why Benedict was writing the letters (to rebuke a cardinal who criticized his resignation), Francis wasn’t the issue. The Times must get so dizzy from trying to spin things so hard.
The words of the Pope Emeritus from November 2017 show he is aware of the pain his resignation caused, and the sorrow people feel about the current situation facing the Church.
The title is true only in the most general sense: Ratzinger rebuked a Cardinal who is also a critic of Pope Francis. The rebuke had absolutely nothibg to with Pope Francis, however, and everything to do with the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI. It seems that the NYT is trying to make a rather obscure matter that would only be of interest to a select few Catholics tie in to a bigger story.
No idea why they would do so. It is a pretty ham-fisted attempt.
DISCLAIMER: Catholic Answers has turned over the archive to Catholic-Questions.org and no longer owns, manages, or moderates the forums. For additional apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.