S
sek
Guest
Hello:
Has any one heard of the Incarnation of God in the womb of Mary being referred to as the first Sacrament? Maybe in some early Church writings? I have often thought that maybe the early Christians were overwhelmed by the implications of the Incarnation: Infinite Divinity choosing to take upon Himself a human nature. Today, we know from modern science that the atoms in our body get recycled many times during our lifetimes. For us, this is not such a big deal, but for the Son of God, isn’t it? Doesn’t the doctrine of the hypostatic union state that Jesus’ divine nature and his human nature are inseparable? We know that Jesus shared bodily fluids with our Blessed Mother while in her womb, and that He walked the earth for roughly 30 years. His atoms left His body and entered other people’s body and diffused into the environment. Don’t the Scriptures refer to Christ saving creation? I often wonder if the early Christians didn’t have a better understanding of the implications of the Incarnation than we do. Could it be said that the Crucifixion, Resurrection, and Ascension transformed the spiritual world by opening up the gates of Heaven and such, and that analogously, the Incarnation transformed the physical or material world? I sense that the wonder the early Christians had for the Incarnation explains the blooming of the Sacraments along with the verbal direction they received from Apostolic authority. It seems to me that the idea of Grace and matter together was not a difficult concept for the early Christians. Protestants do seem to have a difficult time understanding this notion. I wonder if they truly believe that God condescended to take for Himself a human nature and dwell in the womb of a woman for nine months? They seem to take the approach of finding something in Scripture, then arguing about it, then doing something about it. I don’t sense that that is the way the Sacraments came to be. What would they have done before the Scriptures of the New Testament were available to them?
Sorry for the long post, but I have long wanted to get some feedback of these thoughts I’ve had.
In Christ,
Sean.
Has any one heard of the Incarnation of God in the womb of Mary being referred to as the first Sacrament? Maybe in some early Church writings? I have often thought that maybe the early Christians were overwhelmed by the implications of the Incarnation: Infinite Divinity choosing to take upon Himself a human nature. Today, we know from modern science that the atoms in our body get recycled many times during our lifetimes. For us, this is not such a big deal, but for the Son of God, isn’t it? Doesn’t the doctrine of the hypostatic union state that Jesus’ divine nature and his human nature are inseparable? We know that Jesus shared bodily fluids with our Blessed Mother while in her womb, and that He walked the earth for roughly 30 years. His atoms left His body and entered other people’s body and diffused into the environment. Don’t the Scriptures refer to Christ saving creation? I often wonder if the early Christians didn’t have a better understanding of the implications of the Incarnation than we do. Could it be said that the Crucifixion, Resurrection, and Ascension transformed the spiritual world by opening up the gates of Heaven and such, and that analogously, the Incarnation transformed the physical or material world? I sense that the wonder the early Christians had for the Incarnation explains the blooming of the Sacraments along with the verbal direction they received from Apostolic authority. It seems to me that the idea of Grace and matter together was not a difficult concept for the early Christians. Protestants do seem to have a difficult time understanding this notion. I wonder if they truly believe that God condescended to take for Himself a human nature and dwell in the womb of a woman for nine months? They seem to take the approach of finding something in Scripture, then arguing about it, then doing something about it. I don’t sense that that is the way the Sacraments came to be. What would they have done before the Scriptures of the New Testament were available to them?
Sorry for the long post, but I have long wanted to get some feedback of these thoughts I’ve had.
In Christ,
Sean.