I don’t understand how your comment is related to mine.
That is not correct. Catholic believes that God dwells in timeless state.
Time doesn’t exist so there is no outside of time.
I don’t understand how Hetrocausality is related to our discussion.
What do you mean with eternal?
Indeed, however I must ask if that is you concensus on the subject, do you then not acknowledge the validity of my previous arguement:
What do you mean with eternal?
They exist in different versions of the multiverse, Lethal Mouse.
4oknfdkjhfcijj13iou39i13490ufkdaj09123891347931490341coifeh8913u109324u8412098i142091423432p9q3uofjdskvjnoiefqjoiqwu3oiqwjoiafhfsfadior2u3oireujio3r2uio23ruoi32u23oI just found that the current problem is deeper than what was stated in another thread. Please read post #19 for more explanation.I think you already posted this a couple days ago.
God’s decision and acting do not have to be before/after. It can be concurrent. His decision to create and the very act of creation could very well be the same thing.
Humans must decide and then act. We need time for our synapses to process information and then for the electrical signals to reach our muscles and do something. God is spirit, there is no need for this.
I’d say that God’s will and His actions are not different things. Of course there is no ‘before’ or ‘after’ in eternity. His actions are not dependent on anything. He does not need to think, then act, then reflect, then do something else. God just is.
I just found out that the problem is deeper than what is stated in another thread.
We don’t have direct access to objective ideas, so called absolute truth.
That is not correct. I am just tryting to show that your definition of God is incoherent.
I think we can manage it. Everything is matter of mental exercises otherwise your God is cruel, because He would create human, intellectual beings, then putting them in the box of ignorance, so called universe.
This is incorrect
To YOU
You didn’t manage it. You again claimed that if you can’t understand it, no one can.
And you know this how?
I disagree.
And God is so far above our understanding that we can’t hope to explain him. I can’t tell you the mechanics of how my car runs either but I can use it to get me places.
I think we can agree on this then. I shall be off in my Tardis
The part in bold is a direct contradiction. That which is not bound by time will appear to be simultaneous…this was part of your argument for why timeless can’t be a thing, because you said that sequence denotes time. This is not necessarily true, but without a sense of time to regulate sequence, it can in fact be said to be ‘simultaneous’.
Actually, they are not. They are part of the reality God created and exist whether or not we see, recognize, or acknowledge them. We use our minds (rationality, imaginations) to DEFINE and EXPLAIN the concepts we see. Our minds do NOT cause or construct them.
