M
modestobruce
Guest
I just read about St. Imdelda Lambertini whose body lies in state in Bologna uncorrupted. Besides hers and St. Bernadette of Lourdes, how many bodies are in existence this way? I find this remarkable!
Bruce, I also wish I knew more about incorruption. We could really use a coroner’s or forensic pathologist’s explanations to learn more about how do dead bodies decompose normally and how are the incorrupt saints’ cases different from this. This is what I learned by reading about the subject, not being an expert in the field: under normal conditions, bodies become rigid a few hours after death. Blood coagulates, and the dead body does not bleed when cut. I don’t know the underlying biochemical mechanisms for these phenomena, but this is what ordinarily happens to dead bodies. Therefore, when a saint’s incorrupt body is supple (not rigid, no rigor mortis) many years after his/her death, and bleeds fresh-looking (uncoagulated) blood when cut, that is an extraordinary phenomenon. Regarding the decomposition of the body, I know that the cells of a living body contain organelles called lysosomes, and lysosomes are filled with powerful enzymes called cathepsins. Cathepsins would attack and decompose the body by cutting up proteins into amino acids, had they not been trapped inside the lysosomes. After death, cathepsins do escape from lysosomes and decompose the body through breaking down (“hydrolysis”) of the proteins that make up the body. In essence, the body will decompose itself, without any need for bacteria, molds, or worms eating it. Ancient Egypt developed some methods where the internal organs of a body, which normally degrade first, are removed from the corpse, and the remainder of the body is embalmed and fails to decompose under such conditions. The Catholic Church will consider a body incorrupt if no special measures were taken to preserve the body (no embalming), and the body also stayed supple after death. It’s not like St Bernadette or any other saint were presumed to remain incorrupt and never buried. Typically, they have been buried just like any other dead people, in caskets placed in crypts or buried under the ground. Then, when they are exhumed years, dozens of years, or even hundreds of years after their death, the bodies are found incorrupt and supple. Under ordinary conditions, one would expect only the skeleton to remain intact years after death.How do we know this phenomenon isn’t just a twist of nature, so to speak? Are there non-Christian bodies in a like state? How does a body become known as incorruptible? Eg, St. Bernadette…was she presumed for sainthood and never buried? After death, did they just leave her laying in her deathbed as is? Sorry for these “dumb” questions, but, I find this phenomenon just astounding! I’m 53 years-old and thought I’ve heard of everything; apparently not!
As far as I know this miraculous phenomenon has only occurred to people who were devoutly Catholic, I’m not aware of this any Protestants. Check out this site, it’s pretty cool: overcomeproblems.com/incorruptables.htmHow do we know this phenomenon isn’t just a twist of nature, so to speak? Are there non-Christian bodies in a like state? How does a body become known as incorruptible? Eg, St. Bernadette…was she presumed for sainthood and never buried? After death, did they just leave her laying in her deathbed as is? Sorry for these “dumb” questions, but, I find this phenomenon just astounding! I’m 53 years-old and thought I’ve heard of everything; apparently not!
Is someone trying to tell me something?As far as I know this miraculous phenomenon has only occurred to people who were devoutly Catholic, I’m not aware of this any Protestants. Check out this site, it’s pretty cool: overcomeproblems.com/incorruptables.htm
He has, it’s called Fatima and the best (sarcasm) explanation (if that’s what you want to call it) was that 70,000 + people experienced a mass delusion which in itself would be a miracle.A miracle would be an incorrupt body that had been lying in the sea for a thousand years. Or one that had been subject to a serious attempt at lengthy cremation. Or with its severed limbs reattached. There are obvious, natural explanations (including wax masks) for all these alleged cases. if God wants to ‘prove’ something to us, by doing a miracle, why doesn’t he do something miraculous?
How do we know this phenomenon isn’t just a twist of nature, so to speak? Are there non-Christian bodies in a like state? How does a body become known as incorruptible? Eg, St. Bernadette…was she presumed for sainthood and never buried? After death, did they just leave her laying in her deathbed as is? Sorry for these “dumb” questions, but, I find this phenomenon just astounding! I’m 53 years-old and thought I’ve heard of everything; apparently not!/QUOT
St’ Bernadette was buried. Due to the huge number of miraculous healings at Lourdes following her death, her body was disinterred some years later to check for signs of corruption. A crucifix in her hands had rusted and most of her clothing had rotted away. Other than that there was no decomposition,just some traces of mold on her body. The sisters of her order bathed the body, dressed it in a new habit and she was re buriued. She was disinterred years later and at that time there was several blackened spots on her body but no real decomposition to speak of…
Somebody mentioned the appearance of St. Bernadette’s body.
I’ think you’ll find that her face, and that of St. Padre Pio, have been covered with a light wax mask, as they were a little decomposed and unsightly - blackened and shrunk, i think.
Also, regarding natural explanations for the phenomenon. Last time we discussed this. I posted about the Anglican Cathedral here in Liverpool digging up some 18th or 19th Century graves to extend their car-park. Some of the coffins fell off the back of the lorry and split open, revealing incorrupt bodies. It turned out that they had been preserved by the underground chalybeate spring.
I;'m sure one or two of them were very saintly, but not all.
St Bernadette was buried in1879. Due to the huge number of miraculous healings at Lourdes following her death, her body was disinterred on September 9,1909, in the presence of representatives appointed by the postulators of the cause, two doctors, and a sister of the community. They claimed that although the crucifix in her hand and the rosary had both oxidized, her body appeared “incorrupt” — preserved from decomposition. This was cited as one of the miracles to support her canonization. They washed and reclothed her body before burial in a new double casket. The Church exhumed the corpse a second time on 3 April 1919. A doctor who examined the body noted, “The body is practically mummified, covered with patches of mildew and quite a notable layer of salts, which appear to be calcium salts. … The skin has disappeared in some places, but it is still present on most parts of the body.”How do we know this phenomenon isn’t just a twist of nature, so to speak? Are there non-Christian bodies in a like state? How does a body become known as incorruptible? Eg, St. Bernadette…was she presumed for sainthood and never buried? After death, did they just leave her laying in her deathbed as is? Sorry for these “dumb” questions, but, I find this phenomenon just astounding! I’m 53 years-old and thought I’ve heard of everything; apparently not!
Poor, saintly woman… I wish they’d just leave her body alone. Our Lord never said that one of the criteria for saintliness was a perfectly-preserved body. This very idea doesn’t seem to trust in God much, since even the most horribly-rotted corpses will be raised perfectly on the final day anyway. Why would God preserve certain holy ones in bodily form if all will be perfected later?St Bernadette was buried in1879. Due to the huge number of miraculous healings at Lourdes following her death, her body was disinterred on September 9,1909, in the presence of representatives appointed by the postulators of the cause, two doctors, and a sister of the community. They claimed that although the crucifix in her hand and the rosary had both oxidized, her body appeared “incorrupt” — preserved from decomposition. This was cited as one of the miracles to support her canonization. They washed and reclothed her body before burial in a new double casket. The Church exhumed the corpse a second time on 3 April 1919. A doctor who examined the body noted, “The body is practically mummified, covered with patches of mildew and quite a notable layer of salts, which appear to be calcium salts. … The skin has disappeared in some places, but it is still present on most parts of the body.”
In 1925, the church exhumed the body for a third time. On that occasion relics were taken, which were sent to Rome.
In my humble opinion, if there is a God, and he does miraculously preserve bodies, he would do a much better job than this.St Bernadette was buried in1879. Due to the huge number of miraculous healings at Lourdes following her death, her body was disinterred on September 9,1909, in the presence of representatives appointed by the postulators of the cause, two doctors, and a sister of the community. They claimed that although the crucifix in her hand and the rosary had both oxidized, her body appeared “incorrupt” — preserved from decomposition. This was cited as one of the miracles to support her canonization. They washed and reclothed her body before burial in a new double casket. The Church exhumed the corpse a second time on 3 April 1919. A doctor who examined the body noted, “The body is practically mummified, covered with patches of mildew and quite a notable layer of salts, which appear to be calcium salts. … The skin has disappeared in some places, but it is still present on most parts of the body.”
In 1925, the church exhumed the body for a third time. On that occasion relics were taken, which were sent to Rome.
I am sure there is not reliable evidence that 70.000 people experienced this event, but I accept that there is evidence it was reported by some. Was it ever subjected to any sort of scientific investigation?He has, it’s called Fatima and the best (sarcasm) explanation (if that’s what you want to call it) was that 70,000 + people experienced a mass delusion which in itself would be a miracle.
Well, quite.In my humble opinion, if there is a God, and he does miraculously preserve bodies, he would do a much better job than this.
I’ve always been puzzled about these reports of so many seeing the 'event, and how convinced they were that something extraordinary had happened.I am sure there is not reliable evidence that 70.000 people experienced this event, but I accept that there is evidence it was reported by some. Was it ever subjected to any sort of scientific investigation?
I am sure there is not reliable evidence that 70.000 people experienced this event, but I accept that there is evidence it was reported by some. Was it ever subjected to any sort of scientific investigation?
You have no idea~I’ve always been puzzled about these reports of so many seeing the 'event, and how convinced they were that something extraordinary had happened.
If it HAD been so many, where are the ‘fruits’? Surely so many people so fired up and so convinced should have had a longlasting effect on the church in Portugal? Surely it would have been like a Pentecost, with them going back to their towns and villages, full of zeal, inspiring others? And then these effects reaching worldwide, even taking into account the less-developed communications of the 19th century?