Indian Diplomat lied about wages paid, arrested

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mickey_Finn
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Mickey_Finn

Guest
Apparently the Indians, a nation still struggling under a caste system. Are outraged that their diplomat was strip searched, and thrown in with the GEN-POP. Serves her right I would say.

She lied to us, and has mistreated her employee.

cnn.com/2013/12/17/politics/india-us-diplomat/

The prosecutor in the U.S. government’s case against an Indian diplomat charged in New York with visa fraud related to her treatment of her housekeeper expressed dismay Wednesday over the direction the case has taken.

Indian officials summoned U.S. Ambassador Nancy Powell, took away U.S. diplomats’ identification cards that gave them diplomatic benefits and removed security barriers outside the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi.

But Bharara said Khobragade’s treatment was justified. He cited an 11-page complaint that alleged she had promised in the visa application under which her housekeeper moved from India to the United States to pay her at least $9.75 per hour, the minimum wage in New York, and to require that she work no more than 40 hours per week.

But the complaint alleges that Khobragade then had the housekeeper, who has been identified as Sangeeta Richard, sign a second contract, which paid her less than $3.31 per hour and required that she work much longer hours.

The second contract, which was not to be revealed to the U.S. government, “deleted the required language protecting the victim from other forms of exploitation and abuse” and also deleted language that said Khobragade agreed to abide by U.S. laws, he said.

Khobragade is charged with one count of visa fraud – which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison – and one count of making false statements – which carries a maximum sentence of five years.
 
Whoah… Since when an accusation of visa fraud and an employment dispute warrants strip search and arrest?
 
Apparently the Indians, a nation still struggling under a caste system.
Apparently, Americans, the nation which firmly believes in diplomatic immunity of its own personnel, do not understand that it works both ways:
U.S. diplomat kills man in car crash, leaves Kenya
Jason Straziuso, Associated Press 12:15 p.m. EDT August 2, 2013
Police say a U.S. diplomat was speeding in Kenya when he rammed into a bus and killed a father of three
U.S. Embassy officials in Nairobi rushed the American and his family out of Kenya the next day, leaving the crash victims with no financial assistance to pay for a funeral and for hospital bills for the eight or so others who were seriously injured.
Latifah Naiman Mariki, 38 and whose husband was killed in the crash, was almost evicted from her house this week after her landlord demanded rent. Mariki’s deceased husband, Haji Lukindo, was the family’s only source of income. Mariki told The Associated Press that neither the American driver nor anyone at the U.S. Embassy has contacted her, and she doesn’t know how she will provide for her soon-to-be-born child and three children, ages 20, 10 and 7.
usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/08/02/diplomat-kenya-car-crash/2612229/
 
Whoah… Since when an accusation of visa fraud and an employment dispute warrants strip search and arrest?
Well they are crimes which lead to arrest. Arrest includes strip search…

ATB
 
Because we are dealing with a violent criminal who couldn’t be summoned to the court normally, right?
Typically, a suspect is processed then a judge determines if they may be released prior to their court date. I would think the flight risk is high for this woman.

ATB
 
Harf also said that Khobragade enjoys “consular immunity,” a limited diplomatic immunity related to her official duties. Under the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, consular officials can be arrested for acts committed outside official job functions.
The State Department said Khobragade’s consular immunity does not cover the charges she faces.
 
Typically, a suspect is processed then a judge determines if they may be released prior to their court date. I would think the flight risk is high for this woman.
In Europe, it’s pretty much unthinkable that someone would be arrested for an offense of that caliber. She would be questioned and forbidden to leave the country.

One thing which never ceases to amaze me is that the US does not check who is leaving the country – cf. Roman Polanski who was allowed to leave during his own trial. Unthinkable everywhere else.
 
In Europe, it’s pretty much unthinkable that someone would be arrested for an offense of that caliber. She would be questioned and forbidden to leave the country.

One thing which never ceases to amaze me is that the US does not check who is leaving the country – cf. Roman Polanski who was allowed to leave during his own trial. Unthinkable everywhere else.
We check everything we can these days.

ATB
 
One thing which never ceases to amaze me is that the US does not check who is leaving the country – cf. Roman Polanski who was allowed to leave during his own trial.
:rotfl:

We don’t know who’s coming or going half the time!

But you see, knowing that kind of information is racccissssstttttt and might lead to profiling!

PS–Get the folks coming here and getting naturalized voting GOP and we’d have border security overnight. 👍
Unthinkable everywhere else.
Really???/You mean that the American left open borders crowd isn’t doing what the rest of the world is??? :eek:

And…the rest of the world doesn’t think highly of that…that’s even worse!! :eek::eek:

They should see how Mexico treats First World tourists and what goes down on the Guatemalan border. 😦
 
Well they are crimes which lead to arrest. Arrest includes strip search…

ATB
I could understand a strip search for certain crimes, but for this?? Nah, they should not have done that, and really they had no right to arrest her in the first place, she couldve killed someone, and they still have no right to arrest her, its called immunity and she had it, this makes the US look very incompetent imo.

The police dept and city involved will probably end up writing her a big fat check and that will be the end of it.
 
I could understand a strip search for certain crimes, but for this?? Nah, they should not have done that, and really they had no right to arrest her in the first place, she couldve killed someone, and they still have no right to arrest her, its called immunity and she had it, this makes the US look very incompetent imo.

The police dept and city involved will probably end up writing her a big fat check and that will be the end of it.
no she doesn’t
 
I could understand a strip search for certain crimes, but for this?? Nah, they should not have done that, and really they had no right to arrest her in the first place, she couldve killed someone, and they still have no right to arrest her, its called immunity and she had it, this makes the US look very incompetent imo.

The police dept and city involved will probably end up writing her a big fat check and that will be the end of it.
Ha,ha,ha. Everyone who’s arrested gets strip searched. You don’t want to be strip searched? Fine, don’t do bad things. 🤷

Reference any immunity she may enjoy. I’m sure that there will be diplomatic negotiating. The question is what does India have to offer.

I should point out that She is a lovely woman who seems to have some sense of entitlement. Especially as it pertains to how she treats others.

ATB
 
Ha,ha,ha. Everyone who’s arrested gets strip searched. You don’t want to be strip searched? Fine, don’t do bad things. 🤷
Good advice, but not enough to ensure no arrest.

One can be arrested for being accused of an offense. The trial is part of the process in determining whether or not some one did a “bad thing.” Not doing bad things does not ensure one won’t be arrested.

I had a neighbor that didn’t like some one else in the aand made an accusation that resulted in an arrest. After some jail time it was determined the accusation was false and charges were dismissed. But this still involved an arrest.
 
Because we are dealing with a violent criminal who couldn’t be summoned to the court normally, right?
Violent? Well… I guess there’s nothing really violent about what may amount to human trafficking…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top