Indictment Against Head of Burisma Reveals ‘Hunter Biden Was Receiving Payments From Money Raised Through CRIMINAL MEANS, Siphoned, Laundered From Ukr

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cathoholic

Guest

Indictment Against Head of Burisma Reveals ‘Hunter Biden Was Receiving Payments From Money Raised Through CRIMINAL MEANS, Siphoned, Laundered From Ukraine’​

Cristina Laila November 20, 2019 207 Comments

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

The head of Burisma Holdings was indicted on November 14th, but it wasn’t reported until Wednesday.

The Office of the Prosecutor General in Ukraine indicted Burisma owner Nikolai Zlochevsky.

The indictment was damning and revealed Hunter Biden’s income under his contract with Burisma is a “link that reveals how money is siphoned [from Ukraine].”

Via Tass.com:
The Ukrainian Office of the Prosecutor General has drawn up an indictment against the owner of the Burisma Holdings energy company, ex-Ecology Minister Nikolai Zlochevsky, that contains information that the son of former US Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter, as a Burisma board member along with his partners received $16.5 million for their services, . . . . According to him, the money came from duplicitous criminal activity.

According to the politician, “the son of Vice-President Joe Biden was receiving payment for his services, with money raised through criminal means and money laundering.” He also clarified that “Biden received money that did not come from the company’s successful operation but rather from money stolen from citizens.”

Dubinsky stressed that the information on Hunter Biden’s income under his contract with Burisma is a “link that reveals how money is siphoned [from Ukraine].“
Click to expand...
Ukrainian MP Alexander Dubinsky said in a presser Wednesday that he will reveal information about a “pyramid scheme” created in Ukraine using stolen funds, moved offshore and “bought Ukrainian public bonds turning them into the Ukrainian sovereign debt.”

Ukrainian MP Alexander Dubinsky said in a presser Wednesday that he will reveal information about a “pyramid scheme” created in Ukraine using stolen funds, moved offshore and “bought Ukrainian public bonds turning them into the Ukrainian sovereign debt.” . . .
Click to expand...
www.thegatewaypundit.com

Indictment Against Head of Burisma Reveals 'Hunter Biden Was Receiving Payments From Money Raised Through CRIMINAL MEANS, Siphoned, Laundered From Ukraine' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

The head of Burisma Holdings was indicted on November 14th, but it wasn’t reported until Wednesday.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
 

Owner of Ukrainian Energy Firm that Employed Hunter Biden Investigated for Corruption​

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

(Screenshot/ABC)

HARIS ALIC

21 Nov 2019

. . . The news comes as Burisma and its relationship to Hunter Biden take center stage in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.

The company became central to the proceedings when Trump suggested the Ukrainian government investigate how Hunter Biden was able to secure a seat on its board of directors in the first place.

Democrats argue the president’s suggestion to Ukraine likely amounted to an impeachable offense at the launch of their inquiry. Trump and his allies, on the other hand, have claimed Hunter Biden’s appointment, coming around the same time his father was tapped to lead Obama-era policy towards Ukraine, and his relative inexperience in the energy industry, warrant investigation.

As Peter Schweizer, senior contributor at Breitbart News, detailed in his book, Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends , Hunter Biden had no prior experience with either the energy industry or Ukraine before joining Burisma in April 2014. In fact, his background in investment banking, lobbying, and hedge fund management paled in comparison to that of current and past members of the company’s board of directors.

Adding to concerns is the fact that, at the time Hunter Biden joined Burisma—where he was paid as much as $83,000-per-month—the company was seen as actively courting western leaders to prevent further scrutiny of its business practices. The same month Hunter Biden was tapped for the group’s board, the government of Great Britain froze accounts belonging to Zlochevsky under suspicion of money laundering.

A Ukrainian official with strong ties to Zlochevsky admitted in October the only reason that Hunter Biden secured the appointment was to “protect” the company from foreign scrutiny. The claim has credence given that at the time, Joe Biden, as the sitting vice president, was tasked with leading the Obama administration’s policy towards Ukraine in response to Russia’s invasion of Crimea. . . .
Click to expand...
Bold and spelling correction mine.

www.breitbart.com

Owner of Ukrainian Firm that Paid Hunter Biden Suspected of Corruption

The Ukrainian oligarch who appointed Hunter Biden to the board of Burisma Holdings is facing new allegations of public corruption.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
 
ProVobis . . .
Is this the dirt that Trump was looking for?
Click to expand...
Corruption being unearthed.

Your reply?
Is this the dirt that Trump was looking for?
Click to expand...
If no corruption were there your reply would merely be . . .

Well we now know it was all for nothing because no corruption was ever found linked to Burisma.

.

Trump loses no matter what they find. It is always Trump’s fault. (According to your guys.)

Acne? “Why that is Trump’s fault!”

And I’m saying that is not persuasive. Especially in light of the facts.

There will be careful audits.

Burusma is a big oil and energy outfit.
But it appears it was also a front for international money laundering as well.
(Some of the same guys crying about big oil, while they were on the take from big oil [Burisma] were trying to play the global warming game too. It is immoral. They get rich both ways.)

The accountants will follow the money and know about Hunter Biden . . . and John Kerry.
 
Last edited:
That’s some interesting propaganda you’ve got there.
Cathoholic said:
Via Tass.com :
Click to expand...
Literally a news outlet belonging to the Russian government.
Cathoholic said:
Cristina Laila
Click to expand...
Literally a writer for “Russia-Insider”
https://russia-insider.com/en/cristina-laila
She publishes alongside articles like this blatantly racist drivel:

Cathoholic said:
indicted Burisma
Click to expand...
Authored by “Tyler Durden” i.e. the main character of the movie Fight Club.
 
Last edited:
JapaneseKappa . . .
Literally a news outlet belonging to the Russian government.
Click to expand...
So what is your point?

Are you saying the story is false?

Your comment seems pointless. Help me to understand what you are saying here.
 
JapaneseKappa implicitly telling me which news sources I need to avoid.

I quoted Breitbart and Gateway Pundit.
That you are far too quick to overlook obviously unreliable sources
Click to expand...
Huh?

Maybe I should quote CNN who got it wrong for almost three years on a fake Trump-Russian-Collusion narrative?

How about ABC on that Syrian “war zone” footage? Maybe you think THAT would be a better source.

Or the usual MSM outfits on Jussie. I see Jussie is still maintaining his innocence. Maybe Chicago needs to re-start the investigation into those MAGA-wearing “supremicists” huh?

Maybe I can get a little “Covington Catholic” insights from those MSM outlets right?

Breitbart got it right on these.

Now @mrad25 has mentioned Reuters is ALSO reporting it.

Have you ever thought that maybe the fact that
your guys are doing CNN,
is the REASON
they DON’T KNOW
about things like this?

.

JapaneseKappa . . .
there are no mainstream sources that deal in conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...
Sure.

For everyone else. That’s pretty much ALL the MSM delves into (politically). Ok. I admit I am using a little hyperbole here.

But the MSM, is the KING of conspiracy theories.
They will also “quash” REAL STORIES. Just ask Amy Robach.
 
Last edited:
Cathoholic said:
Now @mrad25 has mentioned Reuters is ALSO reporting it.
Click to expand...
The Reuters article says fundamentally different things than your sources. Trying to pretend they are the same does not excuse your inexplicable affinity for literal Russian propaganda and writers with blatant ties to white nationalism.

I originally included the article in my post to show how far off base your articles were. I only deleted it because @mrad25 posted it first, although I see that didn’t stop her from posting it again
 
Last edited:
So what? Fundamentally different things.

Many articles contain fundamentally different things.

If they didn’t you could get all your news from one source.

Instead of you telling me which sources I should use, why not just put up your own posts and quit worrying about how I look at the news?
 
Cathoholic said:
Maybe I should quote CNN who got it wrong for almost three years
Click to expand...
Literally fabricated information on Gateway Pundit:
Wrong shooter in Las Vegas (shooter was Stephen Paddock not Geary Danley)
https://archive.is/CKjvh
Literal lies about truckers in Puerto Rico:

www.politifact.com

Fake news: Puerto Rico's truckers aren't refusing to drive

Conservative news outlets have been spreading a false story online that wrongly says aid to Hurricane Maria victims isn’
www.politifact.com www.politifact.com
 
I didn’t ask about a story in 2017.

I asked about THIS story.

Here it is again.
So what is your point?

Are you saying the story is false?

Your comment seems pointless. Help me to understand what you are saying here.
Click to expand...
And I still have no idea what point you are attempting to make.
 
Last edited:
Anti-Trump sources only @Cathoholic come on! Duhhhhh. 😉 They get free passes on wrong reporting too.
 
Last edited:
they are literal propaganda.
Click to expand...
So says you.
your disregard for your sources’ quality is deeply irresponsible.
Click to expand...
That’s exactly what I was thinking about the MSM sources. And I gave you good reasons WHY (which you ignored).
 
For readers here.

Here is another example of tag-teaming fake news by the MSM.

Awhile back Schiff made up a phony transcript about what President Trump allegedly said.

Schiff said it was essentially (“in essence”) what transpired in the phone call.

He was lying.

Here it is.

.

Schiff . . . .
“This is the essence of what the president communicates,” Schiff began.

“We’ve been very good to your country. Very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what? I don’t see much reciprocity here. I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from YOU though. And I’m going to say this only seven times so you better listen good,” Schiff read from his fabricated conversation.

“I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of it,” he continued.

“On this and on that. I’m gonna put you in touch with people and not just any people,” he continued, affecting an accent meant to resemble Trump’s. “I’m going to put you with the attorney general of the United States, my attorney general Bill Barr. He’s got the whole weight of the American law enforcement behind him.”

“And I’m gonna put you in touch with Rudy, you’re gonna love him, trust me,” Schiff said, still avoiding any real quotations from the transcript. “You know what I’m asking, so I’m only going to say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And by the way don’t call me again. I’ll call you when you’ve done what I’ve asked.”

Schiff said of his made-up conversation, “This is in sum and character what the president was trying to communicate.”
Click to expand...
.

Nancy Pelosi takes to the media to perpetuate this myth.

George Stephanopoulos (GS) gives her a gentle correction.

Then Nancy doubles down on perpetuating a falsehood that she HAD TO know was phony.

When Nancy doubles down on it and changes the subject GS lets her get away with it.

Here it is . . .

.
STEPHANOPOULOS: I know you support Chairman Schiff but was it right for him to have that dramatic interpretation of the President’s ah transcript (transfer?) of the phone call at the hearing last week?

PELOSI: I want the American people to know what that phone call was about.
I want them to hear it (Adam Schiff’s interpretation). So, yeah, it’s fair. It’s sad but
he (Adam Schiff) was using the president’s own words.
So if he’s—.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, those weren’t the president’s words, it was an interpretation of the president’s words. They’re saying he made this up.

PELOSI: He (Adam Schiff) did not make it up. . . .

(Mine: Then Nancy changes the subject. GS lets her get away with it.)
Click to expand...
To the readers here. You can view THAT spectacle here and draw your own conclusions.


Remember. This was all BEFORE President Trump released the transcript and pulled back the curtain on this fakery.

Also to the readers here.

This is the kind of mind-numbing “news” that many on the left want YOU to feast on night after night.

Don’t be fooled by them.

It is about manipulating you, so they (nationally) or “their guy” (more locally) get more power and control over you.

Don’t fall for it.
 
Last edited:
Cathoholic said:
Remember. This was all BEFORE President Trump released the transcript and pulled back the curtain on this fakery.
Click to expand...
Vindman has disputed the released transcript. The Trump administration has refused to obey a subpoena to turn over documents which would settle the issue.
 
JapaneseKappa . . .
Vindman has disputed the released transcript. The Trump administration has refused to obey a subpoena to turn over documents which would settle the issue.
Click to expand...
JapaneseKappa is making my point here.

JK is inferring that Schiff’s and Pelosi’s ruse is true.

Or JK is giving you a deflection.

Or JK is giving you an irrelevancy.

Even Schiff and Pelosi aren’t trying to push Schiff’s phony theatre as “He did not make it up” anymore.

If you guys want, you can ask JK yourself if he thinks Schiffs theatre was TRUE.

If he says yes. Draw your own conclusions.
If he says no, then why put up the last (pointless) post.
If he waffles then you are back to drawing your own conclusions.

I won’t need to tell you what to think. It will be very obvious.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top