R
Reuben_J
Guest
Yes, my bad. I didn’t read properly. I thought he was a Catholic in a mixed marriage.
Yes I am wondering OP if she will agree to let you take them at a 5 pm mass and then go to her church in the morning?What is non-negotiable is not being able to take the kids to mass. What is non-negotiable is that you must go to mass. You should attend Protestant services with her and so should her kids but on the condition that the kids must go to Catholic services. She doesn’t have to come! You have an obligation to raise the kids Catholic.
Well… he is. It’s just that it wasn’t a mixed marriage at the time they married. So, that makes for quite a conundrum now.Yes, my bad. I didn’t read properly. I thought he was a Catholic in a mixed marriage.
I agree very much with this!The husband is the spiritual head of the family. I would be firm and baptize the children. The wife should be subordinate.
Not a popular opinion and easier said than done, obviously.
no, i don’t agree with that all
Unfortunately, then, you’re quite mistaken. From the baptismal rite:this isn’t really that complicated…
if the parents are receptive to catholic baptism (even for decorative/ceremonial purposes)
let it hap’n’ , cap’n
So, I get it that you disagree and all, but… the Church disagrees with you.Celebrant: You have asked to have your child baptized. In doing so you are accepting the responsibility of training him (her) in the practice of the faith. It will be your duty to bring him (her) up to keep God’s commandments as Christ taught us, by loving God and our neighbor. Do you clearly understand what you are undertaking?
Parents: We do.
No… what’s in play here isn’t ‘lukewarmness’, but rather, whether the parent(s) are able to live up to the obligation they assume at the baptism.are you suggesting the child shouldn’t be baptized in the catholic church because the parents are lukewarm about the faith?
1. Get the child Baptized IF, if your pastor will permit it {he may not given your wife’s stated position}; but call and ask him giving ALL of the information you shared here.I am a recently converted Catholic. My wife and I were raised Protestant. We were practicing Protestants when we were married. Halfway through the pregnancy of our second child I entered the Catholic Church. She wasn’t happy about it. Still isn’t. But she is supportive. After our second child was born he nearly died at a week old. We believe different things about baptism, but she said for my peace of mind, I could have our children baptized. But she wasn’t having any part of it. Doesn’t want our children raised Catholic. And I can’t take them to mass. (One is 2 yo and the other 7 months btw.
As according to the OP, the wife allows for Baptism but against raising the children Catholics.
That, of course, is the question. If she says “go ahead and baptize them” and also “but don’t raise them Catholic”, then it’s clear she doesn’t understand what Catholic baptism entails. Therefore, baptism now is not recommended, while this is the situation between the OP and his wife.Would the wife understand what it entails for a child to be baptised, which she agrees to, in the Catholic Church?
While his wife would reject this approach.The OP, however, would try his best to raise them as ones.
No – if she’d have said, “I’m not going to help you”, that’d be one thing. According to the OP, what she actually said was, “don’t raise the child in the Catholic faith.” That’s quite a different thing.As it is now, only the husband can be counted to bring the children up in the Catholic faith, while the wife would have nothing with it.
There is greater risk than being baptized – and not meeting the obligations of baptism (both for child and parent) – than in not being baptized.For those who push for Baptism, I think it is because the wife’s cooperation is not forthcoming, and the children will risk being not baptised.