Inquisition Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Protestant101
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am not trying to be difficult here; but I am already disfigured horribly; from severe burns; this wonderful assurance would not have made me feel any better as I was being dragged off to the torture room.But I am not into dwelling on it all either. I am just trying to establish the facts. I am a history buff; if you will and I love to explore doctrinal development within a historical context for a given denomination. What I am trying to find is official Catholic writings of the time that explicitly state that they did condone torture for whatever reasons; and then, similar sources to properly depict the change in this teaching.
'Please see #175 and also you can see the article on the inquisition in the Catholic Encyclopedia online.
 
Dear Protestant 101,

I thought you would be interested in the article in the current issue of This Rock. It is in the “Truth Be told” secion and is called Secrets of the Spanish Inquisition Revealed" and is written by Robert P. Lockwood. It starts on page 34 of the November 2007 issue.

If you would like me to mail you a copy, just send me a PM. I don`t have time to summarize the article but wanted to “flag it” for you. You might also be interested in the article called Excommunication and Interdict.

Sincerely,

Maria1212
 
I can’t believe people believe that D. Rivera was a Jesuit, how many times do people have to debunk that so that everyone can actually have some truth.
 
This question was taken from a thread on Symbolic Eucharist, where it was off topic:
justasking4 said:
A little side track here. Were the catholic popes who endorsed the inquisitions guilty of persecuting the church they were pledged to protect?
I think there have been bishops and priests who profaned their vows, and did persecute believers that they were pledged to protect. I can’t agree that “Catholic popes who endorsed the inqusitions” did so, because that assumes that everything that happened during the inquisions was wrong, which is not the case. In fact, the inquisitons where the only way, in many cases,t hat the accussed would get a trial at all. Otherwise, they would have been summarily executed.
 
The “Inquisition(s)” were first organized in the 1200s
against the Cathars or “Albigensians.”

This was a gnostic sect which claimed that there were two equal Gods – a good God who created all things INVISIBLE,
and a BAD God, who created all things VISIBLE (i.e. made of Matter).

They condemned marriage outright (but not fornication or other forms of sexual sin) because they believed that human beings were really Good Spirits created by the Good God who, somehow, got “Trapped” in Evil Bodies created by the Bad God.
They were militant in spreading their heresy INside the Church and had a good deal of political backing and didn’t mind using force to spread their views.

I wish there had never been any Inquisitions, but I understand why they were originally organized. Also, according to a documentary I saw on either The Discovery Channel or The History Channel,
the popular view of the number of people who died at the hands of the Inquisitions has been GROSSLY exxagerated. According to the documentary, the total number of people who died during the several-hundred year period, was just over 3,000 and not the
“millions” claimed by anti-Catholic polemicists.
The Spanish Inquisition was another type of Inquisition altogether, but that’s another topic.

God bless,
Jaypeeto4
+JMJ+
I just started to read this thread forgive me for bringing up this old post but I think my comment is relavant.

There is no original source documentation for the beliefs of the Cathars. What we seem to know about them we have learned from their enemies. Imagine if you will what would have been told of the US and the UK if Germany had won WWll?
I have reason to believe that these comments are untrue of the Cathars.
 
I just started to read this thread forgive me for bringing up this old post but I think my comment is relavant.

There is no original source documentation for the beliefs of the Cathars. What we seem to know about them we have learned from their enemies. Imagine if you will what would have been told of the US and the UK if Germany had won WWll?
I have reason to believe that these comments are untrue of the Cathars.
You may have reason, but you have not proof.

Are you sure there is no source documentation for the beliefs of the Cathars. Does the Catholic Church show evidence of “misconstruing” other beliefs of heretics? If so, then you have a point. But if the Church has consistently stated the beliefs of heretics - even while maybe over-emphasizing the damage these heresies could do to the faithful - then you’re “reason to believe” is unfounded.

Look at other controversies of the Church. Anytime we find archaeological evidence of the practices and teachings of the early Church, they agree with what the Catholic Church said they were. For instance, the Dead Sea Scrolls could have been very damaging if the Catholic Church had changed early manuscripts. But the DSS confirmed everything that they related to.

Oh yeah, one more point. Many Catholics would probably be deeply offended if they realized that they were being compared to Nazi Germany. A better analogy might be more ecumenical.
 
Oh wait!!! This Edmund Paris book is published by “Jack Chick Productions”???

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Stop it, Matthew, my sides hurt!!!

Seriously, thanks for the good laugh and good day, Matthew.

BTW, I checked with the Vatican today. They are going to make sure that the weather is clear for me in Texas today. The meteorologist (which is Latin for “Jesuit implant”) assures me that they’ll make sure it doesn’t rain on me today. Keep this on the down-low, OK?
Well you are a good catholic if you want to humiliate other people. Why does it matter at all if Jack Chick productions publish it if Paris first wrote it decades before Chick? Paris who btw was a former Catholic. FORMER. Like so many people who have seen the light…
 
Well you are a good catholic if you want to humiliate other people. Why does it matter at all if Jack Chick productions publish it if Paris first wrote it decades before Chick? Paris who btw was a former Catholic. FORMER. Like so many people who have seen the light…
I’m sorry if I humiliated, but if Mr. Paris wanted to find a legitimate publishing company to distribute his book, he certainly could have found more credibility. Maybe the Hari Krishna publishing company was all booked up? 😉

And yes, Mr. Paris could have been catholic in name, but he was not Catholic if he left the Church. That’s just crazy talk!

BTW, welcome to the forums, cs!!! I hope you enjoy your stay!
 
Now if the inquisition started in 1203 and anded in 1808 then that means plenty of tens of millions of people could have been killed in this timespan, even though the population was 6 times less. Question is, why so few? It could be possible that 50 mil was too few, could have been even 500 mil…
It seems that it would be a bit of an exageration to say that 500 million people were killed by the Inquisition?
 
csmatyi;2746717:
“Many millions of Protestants”?

Um, Matthew, the entire population of the whole of Europe had around 75 million people in 1300, and only reached 150 million by 1800. What was the Catholic Church doing, importing people from other planets to kill?
Check the source. It says the Allies lost 50 million people in the 8 yaers of world war 2, 12 million by the Axis. Now if the inquisition started in 1203 and anded in 1808 then that means plenty of tens of millions of people could have been killed in this timespan, even though the population was 6 times less. Question is, why so few? It could be possible that 50 mil was too few, could have been even 500 mil…Let’s see. 605 years divided by 50 million = 82,645 people a year. For 150 million it would be 248,000 people a year. What kind of administrative apparatus would it take to try, convict, and execute that number of people?

Moreover, with the crossover to industrialism and trade-based nation-states, governments ceased to believe that purity of faith was more important than the balance of trade and withdrew from the inquisition business.
 
csmatyi;2746717:
“Many millions of Protestants”?

Um, Matthew, the entire population of the whole of Europe had around 75 million people in 1300, and only reached 150 million by 1800. What was the Catholic Church doing, importing people from other planets to kill?
Check the source. It says the Allies lost 50 million people in the 8 yaers of world war 2, 12 million by the Axis. Now if the inquisition started in 1203 and anded in 1808 then that means plenty of tens of millions of people could have been killed in this timespan, even though the population was 6 times less. Question is, why so few? It could be possible that 50 mil was too few, could have been even 500 mil…Because more accurate estimates place the number in the 1000’s (as low as 3000). Notice it was the secular authorities that put these people to death, not the Church. And also ask yourself, if the Inquisition killed millions (or is it billions and billions now?), then why are there numerous incidences of people requesting trial in an inquisitional court rather than a secular court.
 
csmatyi;3792896:
csmatyi;2746717:
“Many millions of Protestants”?

Um, Matthew, the entire population of the whole of Europe had around 75 million people in 1300, and only reached 150 million by 1800. What was the Catholic Church doing, importing people from other planets to kill?
Let’s see. 605 years divided by 50 million = 82,645 people a year. For 150 million it would be 248,000 people a year. What kind of administrative apparatus would it take to try, convict, and execute that number of people?

Moreover, with the crossover to industrialism and trade-based nation-states, governments ceased to believe that purity of faith was more important than the balance of trade and withdrew from the inquisition business.
Wow, if they ran the trials 24/7 that’d be close to 28 - 29 executions an hour.
 
I’m sorry if I humiliated, but if Mr. Paris wanted to find a legitimate publishing company to distribute his book, he certainly could have found more credibility. Maybe the Hari Krishna publishing company was all booked up? 😉

And yes, Mr. Paris could have been catholic in name, but he was not Catholic if he left the Church. That’s just crazy talk!

BTW, welcome to the forums, cs!!! I hope you enjoy your stay!
Well, buster,

Paris’s book is also being sold by Amazon:

amazon.com/Secret-History-Jesuits-Edmund-Paris/dp/0937958107

Wasn’t the book first printed in French? Because Paris is French, so they translated it from that language. So it wasn’t Chick who first published it. But, actually, what really big difference does it make as to who published the book and when? If Chick wants to publish it then let him do so…

Btw have you even read the book? I doubt it. Was it you who cited a review about it in this forum? It’s not good enough to just simply cite what somebody else wrote about it, you’ll have to read it for yourself. And also, it’s full of footnotes and other references. Paris did a good job of exposing the Jesuits…

Paris was Catholic, not just in name. Just because you leave the church doesn’t mean your knowledge of that church and all your experiences just go down the drain, you know…

Sorry.
 
Mercygate, notworthy, wildgraywolf, dosdog,

You all miss the point as to the number of victims of the inquisition. Btw if it was only 3000, that would be a very big mistake (reference please btw, you’re just asserting things willy nilly into thin air). This would mean only 5 victims a year during 600 years. In Europe this would mean that only one single heretic would pop his head up in a single European country once every 4-5 years. Why in the whole wide world would the Inquisition then have to become institutionalized (an instituition which btw exits to this very day).

It is a known fact that 62 million people were killed in the space of 8 years (world war 2). Also, estimates were made that in just 200 years 60 million bison were killed in North America. The point is that it is quite possible to kill living things at an extremely quick rate. During ww2, the death rate would have been 7,75 mil per year. During the inquisition, this was only 83000 a year. The difference is 93 to one, although the population of Europe was only one sixth it was back then compared to what it is now. Also take into account that since the inquisiton was spread out over many hundreds of years, this makes it possible for different parts of the population to recover from massive exterminations.

Another source which shows it is quite feasible: cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/estimates.doc

But let’s actually cite some Roman Catholic theologians pertaining to the number of victims in the inquisition, which will lay this 3000 figure to rest:

Concerning the Cathari, who were similar to the Waldenses, near the end of the twelfth century “The Dominican Rainerius gave 4,000,000 as a safe estimate of their number and declared this was according to a census made by the Cathari themselves” [Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, 8 volumes (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdman’s, 1910; reprint, 1978), Volume V, Chapter X].

Catholic historian Vergerius admits gleefully that during the Pontificate of Pope Paul IV (1555-1559) “the Inquisition alone, by tortures, starvation, or the fire, murdered more than 150,000 Protestants.”

Argument 2d. ’ Experience shows that terror is not effective.’ I reply, EXPERIENCE PROVES THE CONTRARY—FOR THE DONATISTS, MANICHEANS, AND ALBIGENSES WERE ROUTED, AND ANNIHILATED BY ARMS.
  • Robert Bellarmine (Catholic), Disputationes de Controversiis, Tom. ii, Lib. III, cap. XXII, “Objections Answered,” 1682 edition.
Cardinal Hosius, a member of the Council of Trent, A. D. 1560, testified that:"…then the opinion and persuasion of no sect can be truer and surer than that of the Anabaptists since there have been none for these twelve hundred years past, that have been more generally punished … than these people" (Hosius, Letters Apud Opera, 112-113.

Also, Wesley in his diary of January 16, 1760 quotes Sir John Davis in his “Historical Relations Concerning Ireland” as stating that “from 1600 to 1641, the general massacre, with the ensuing war, again thinned their numbers; not so few as a million of men, women, and children, being destroyed in four years’ time.” The rebellion in 1641 killed more than 150,000 Protestants in Ireland, by the priests’ own computations, and many others died later.

Walter M. Montano,a former Catholic priest, asserts in his book, Behind the Purple Curtain that it has been estimated that fifty million people died for their faith during the twelve hundred years of the Dark Ages. (Citing Walter M. Montano, Behind the Purple Curtain, Cowman Publications, 1950, page 91.)

‘The church,’ says [Martin] Luther, has never burned a heretic.’ . . I reply that this argument proves not the opinion, but the ignorance or impudence of Luther. Since almost infinite" numbers were either burned or otherwise killed…-- Robert Bellarmine, Disputationes de Controversiis, Tom. ii, Lib. III, cap. XXII, “Objections Answered,” 1682 edition. (Bellarmine was a Roman Catholic.)

" We may kill anywhere a man proscribed by the Pope, because the Pope has at least an indirect jurisdiction over all the world, even in temporal things." (The R. F. Jesuit Busembaum- Theologia Moralis.)

Alexander Campbell, stated in debate with John B. Purcell, Bishop of Cincinnati, in 1837 that the records of historians and martyrologists show that it may be reasonable to estimate that from fifty to sixty-eight millions of human beings died, suffered torture,…by the Roman Catholic Church during the awful years of the Inquisition. Bishop Purcell made little effort to refute these figures. (Citing A Debate on the Roman Catholic Religion, Christian Publishing Co., 1837, p. 327.)

Also note that sometimes people were slaughtered on the street like during the St. Bartholomew’s massacre in Paris of the Hugenots when several thousand people were killed within hours, the massacre then spread to other parts of France.

Please note I don’t want to jab at you Catholics, but this is a real concern.
 
You may have reason, but you have not proof.

Are you sure there is no source documentation for the beliefs of the Cathars. Does the Catholic Church show evidence of “misconstruing” other beliefs of heretics? If so, then you have a point. But if the Church has consistently stated the beliefs of heretics - even while maybe over-emphasizing the damage these heresies could do to the faithful - then you’re “reason to believe” is unfounded.

Look at other controversies of the Church. Anytime we find archaeological evidence of the practices and teachings of the early Church, they agree with what the Catholic Church said they were. For instance, the Dead Sea Scrolls could have been very damaging if the Catholic Church had changed early manuscripts. But the DSS confirmed everything that they related to.

Oh yeah, one more point. Many Catholics would probably be deeply offended if they realized that they were being compared to Nazi Germany. A better analogy might be more ecumenical.
Supporting Hisalone,

Cassels writes in his book (Christ and Antichrist) from 1846 that it was said by French nobles that the populace was brought up by the Cathars, and that when the papal legate arrived at the scene to raize Cathar cities to the ground, such as Beziers, they asked how to tell the difference between a Cathar and a Catholic, in order to know who to kill. The reply: “kill them all, the Lord will know His own [that is, the Catholics]”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top