Installation Mass for a Woman

  • Thread starter Thread starter THurifer2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You didn’t answer the question. Whom are you referring to as those who choose to kneel… There are several different groups and parts of the Mass where this occurs. I would like to know which ones you consider to be as you called them, cafeteria catholics.
The ones who feel they can choose to do what they want when the Church says different. They will carp about the female reader and cantor before Mass begins. God forbid if we have a female server. Some will try to coerce visitors to wear head coverings.

They will genuflect during the creed instead of bow. They will refuse to acknowledge anyone – even their spouse next to them during the kiss of peace, but they will gladly extol the horrors of the kiss of peace to anyone who will listen. They will kneel during the agnus dei instead of stand. They are quick to preach about the horrors of the laity assuming the orans position, yet they will cross themselves and tap their breasts throughout the Mass – none of which are mentioned in GIRM or RS.

They will receiving holy communion under one species (perfectly OK) and then tell anyone within earshot that no hand that has not been consecrated should ever touch a chalice. They will whine about the piano, even though it is played reverently and the Church does not prohibit their use.

I have plenty more if you need it…
 
Here in the Archdiocese of Detroit, there is no such thing as a lay “Pastoral Life Administrator”.

If a parish does not have a priest in residence, it is placed under the pastoral care of a Deacon. A lay person cannot manage a parish, only ordained clergy.
 
There are many parishes who have nuns who are called administrators. Administrator and Pastor are two different things. Some say its only a matter of semantics. Now, Nuns are not ordained, they are only lay persons themselves consecrated to a religious life. So non ordained lay persons have taken leadership roles in the church. However, I think that we shouldnt try to reinvent the wheel by creating positions. We should always be careful to never blur the lines between the ordained and nonordained.
 
As has been pointed out, the alb is not strictly a liturgical garment. Technically, any Catholic may wear one, and it is common is some places for lay readers and others to do so. In one (in)famous diocese, an–to be charitable–innovative woman liturgist often is seen standing by as a sort of mistress of ceremonies in an alb.
As a military chaplain’s aide, and because we did not have server’s vestments or a regular alb in my size, the Redemptorist chaplain had me wear one of his habits when serving at the altar.
A few years ago I noticed raised eyebrows, and a double-take from our pastor, when I wore a department store black turtleneck sweater to Mass…I hadn’t thought of a sweater as clerical garb.
 
There are many parishes who have nuns who are called administrators. Administrator and Pastor are two different things. Some say its only a matter of semantics. Now, Nuns are not ordained, they are only lay persons themselves consecrated to a religious life. So non ordained lay persons have taken leadership roles in the church. However, I think that we shouldnt try to reinvent the wheel by creating positions. We should always be careful to never blur the lines between the ordained and nonordained.
While I agree that we should not blur that line, the reality is that in my diocese there are many parishes that have no priest and they are led by lay people: a couple, a sister, a retired teacher, etc.

In all those cases the ‘pastoral agent’ is more than an administrator but is responsible for everything: faith formation (of children & adults), sacramental preparation (sacraments of initiation & marriage), Baptisms, preparing & leading Celebrations of the Word with Communion, taking testimony in annulment cases and yes, in one parish the agent was appointed with Rome’s approval to witness weddings.

These parishes might see a priest 2 or 3 times a year, one who flies in to celebrate Mass at Easter & Christmas and MAYBE once in the summer. Without these agents hard work in this ministry where would the people be?
 
There are many parishes who have nuns who are called administrators. Administrator and Pastor are two different things. Some say its only a matter of semantics. Now, Nuns are not ordained, they are only lay persons themselves consecrated to a religious life. So non ordained lay persons have taken leadership roles in the church. However, I think that we shouldnt try to reinvent the wheel by creating positions. We should always be careful to never blur the lines between the ordained and nonordained.
Yes they are…

Most priests start and parochial vicars and then become administrators of a parish before coming the pastor. I’m not at all sure a layperson can be a parish administrator as that name might well have a specific meaning in the Church.
 
Yes they are…

Most priests start and parochial vicars and then become administrators of a parish before coming the pastor. I’m not at all sure a layperson can be a parish administrator as that name might well have a specific meaning in the Church.
Administrator can mean a lot of things. If there is no priest someone has to be responsible for the day to day running of the parish. To be honest, a lot of it is business related, but there should be a person there to oversee all the minitries, make arrangements for classes, funerals, marriages, sick visits. If there is no resident priest who is going to do all these things? It would either be a group of people or one person.
 
The ones who feel they can choose to do what they want when the Church says different. They will carp about the female reader and cantor before Mass begins. God forbid if we have a female server. Some will try to coerce visitors to wear head coverings.

They will genuflect during the creed instead of bow. They will refuse to acknowledge anyone – even their spouse next to them during the kiss of peace, but they will gladly extol the horrors of the kiss of peace to anyone who will listen. They will kneel during the agnus dei instead of stand. They are quick to preach about the horrors of the laity assuming the orans position, yet they will cross themselves and tap their breasts throughout the Mass – none of which are mentioned in GIRM or RS.

They will receiving holy communion under one species (perfectly OK) and then tell anyone within earshot that no hand that has not been consecrated should ever touch a chalice. They will whine about the piano, even though it is played reverently and the Church does not prohibit their use.

I have plenty more if you need it…
If these are the illustrations that you choose to use for cafeteria Catholics then you apparently have a somewhat limited view of Catholicism. All you have mentioned here are differences in discipline and nothing whatsoever to do with doctrine or dogma.

Bur since that is apparently what concerns you the most we can address those issues.

The carping abut female servers lectors and cantors is of no real importance. People are free not to like a particular practice, The Church doesn’t say accept this and keep your mouth shut. People have a right to their opinions about such things. Many feel that the use of these people unnecessarily intrudes into the area that is rightfully that of the clergy. As far as female servers, since they can never become Priests I see no real reason to have them as one of the main reasons for having young men as severs is to expose them to the Mass at a deeper level so that a vocation may indeed be fostered. .

I really don’t believe that hoardes of mantilla wearing women surround visitors to the church with spare mantilla or babushkas in hand in attempts to COERCE them into wearlng them. It would be interesting to see though:thumbsup:

Genuflect instead of bow in the Creed. Serious issue here. Especially since almost no one even bothers to bow, Of course there are times in the year when a genuflection is called for in the rubrics, you are aware of that correct? In that case would you be as equally displeased at those who don’t genuflect but bow instead? I am interested in your response to that one.

Acknowledging those around them during the Kiss of Peace. Well, the rubrics don’t define what someone is to do in this situation at all, and it is left up to how is it worded, local custom? I’ve seen everything from nodding of heads, to shaking hands, to flashing peace signs to roaming up and down the aisles looking for cute girls to greet. It really doesn’t seem to be that important as in recent years I have seen it omitted altogether in a lot of places

Kneeling during the Agnus Dei instead of standing. Well, we kneel at the end of the Angus Dei, but we used to kneel throughout. To me that is a non issue as you are generally talking about a period of about 30 seconds or so except when you have one of the more progressive versions being sung by the choir. And to be truthful, it takes a few of us older folks a bit longer to kneel than it might someone younger. I will agree though that if the rubrics call for standing we should stand.

The laity and the Orans and tapping the breast. Interesting issue here. Apparently many in the Vatican do not approve of the Orans position for the laity and many dioceses have apparently issued instructions counseling against the practice. I think it kind of falls into the handholding during the Our Father area.

Tapping the breast however** IS** in the rubrics of the Mass even though most people don’t do it. I assume you knew that though.

As to unconsecrated hands not touching the Eucharist that is exactly what many of us were taught. You really can’t fault people too much for believing the very thing the Church taught them to believe in the first place. Let us remember also that the use of extraordinary ministers is not automatic and is not permitted everywhere. It is not required nor mandated at all. It a much overused and abused position.

The piano issue is totally irrelevant as the church doesn’t have rules concerning that particular area and I don’t really understand why you brought it up.

I would be interested in the plenty more that you have though. I certainly hope they have more meat to them than the ones you presented.
 
If these are the illustrations that you choose to use for cafeteria Catholics then you apparently have a somewhat limited view of Catholicism. All you have mentioned here are differences in discipline and nothing whatsoever to do with doctrine or dogma.

Bur since that is apparently what concerns you the most we can address those issues.

The carping abut female servers lectors and cantors is of no real importance. People are free not to like a particular practice, The Church doesn’t say accept this and keep your mouth shut. People have a right to their opinions about such things. Many feel that the use of these people unnecessarily intrudes into the area that is rightfully that of the clergy. As far as female servers, since they can never become Priests I see no real reason to have them as one of the main reasons for having young men as severs is to expose them to the Mass at a deeper level so that a vocation may indeed be fostered. .

I really don’t believe that hoardes of mantilla wearing women surround visitors to the church with spare mantilla or babushkas in hand in attempts to COERCE them into wearlng them. It would be interesting to see though:thumbsup:

Genuflect instead of bow in the Creed. Serious issue here. Especially since almost no one even bothers to bow, Of course there are times in the year when a genuflection is called for in the rubrics, you are aware of that correct? In that case would you be as equally displeased at those who don’t genuflect but bow instead? I am interested in your response to that one.

Acknowledging those around them during the Kiss of Peace. Well, the rubrics don’t define what someone is to do in this situation at all, and it is left up to how is it worded, local custom? I’ve seen everything from nodding of heads, to shaking hands, to flashing peace signs to roaming up and down the aisles looking for cute girls to greet. It really doesn’t seem to be that important as in recent years I have seen it omitted altogether in a lot of places

Kneeling during the Agnus Dei instead of standing. Well, we kneel at the end of the Angus Dei, but we used to kneel throughout. To me that is a non issue as you are generally talking about a period of about 30 seconds or so except when you have one of the more progressive versions being sung by the choir. And to be truthful, it takes a few of us older folks a bit longer to kneel than it might someone younger. I will agree though that if the rubrics call for standing we should stand.

The laity and the Orans and tapping the breast. Interesting issue here. Apparently many in the Vatican do not approve of the Orans position for the laity and many dioceses have apparently issued instructions counseling against the practice. I think it kind of falls into the handholding during the Our Father area.

Tapping the breast however** IS** in the rubrics of the Mass even though most people don’t do it. I assume you knew that though.

As to unconsecrated hands not touching the Eucharist that is exactly what many of us were taught. You really can’t fault people too much for believing the very thing the Church taught them to believe in the first place. Let us remember also that the use of extraordinary ministers is not automatic and is not permitted everywhere. It is not required nor mandated at all. It a much overused and abused position.

The piano issue is totally irrelevant as the church doesn’t have rules concerning that particular area and I don’t really understand why you brought it up.

I would be interested in the plenty more that you have though. I certainly hope they have more meat to them than the ones you presented.
You shoot better than the Rifelman!!!👍 👍
 
Here in the DIocese of Charleston, most of the priests are appointed as administrators. Some of these priests have been priests a long time. We must remember that with the title “Pastor”, there are certain canonical rights that those priests have… I do agree with the necessity of using Lay people in administrative type functions only when there are no priests available to do it. Just some thoughts as I reread this thread.
 
Administrator can mean a lot of things. If there is no priest someone has to be responsible for the day to day running of the parish. To be honest, a lot of it is business related, but there should be a person there to oversee all the minitries, make arrangements for classes, funerals, marriages, sick visits. If there is no resident priest who is going to do all these things? It would either be a group of people or one person.
My point is “Parish Administrator” has a very specific meaning as a title in the Church. It’s more than managing the business and operational aspects of a parish. Many ordained priests hold that title before they become pastors
 
My point is “Parish Administrator” has a very specific meaning as a title in the Church. It’s more than managing the business and operational aspects of a parish. Many ordained priests hold that title before they become pastors
You might be thinking of parochial vicar, which many of the newly ordained priests in my diocese hold until they get enough experience to run a parish on their own.

Now, in my old Central Texas stomping ground we had such a thing as a Pastoral Associate for Administration. She was the one who managed the business and operational end of the parish. We also had a Pastoral Associate for Liturgy and a Pastoral Associate for Faith Formation. But, the priest was the pastor and he had associate pastors.

Now, when a priest transfers from one parish to another, he is Parish Administrator of his old one and pastor of his new one until his successor is appointed. That happened when my friend was transferred to the Cathedral. He was Administrator of his own parish and rector of the new one.

The same holds true for bishops. When we were part of the Diocese of Corpus Christi, our bishop had been named Archbishop of Puerto Rico. Now, he went and assumed that Metropolitan See, but, he was still Apostolic Administrator of our diocese until his successor was appointed. And, no, there wasn’t a lay person running the diocese. The buck still stopped with the Apostolic Administrator.

I am still very much disturbed with what happened in Thurifer’s diocese. In my opinion it does set a bad precedent. As far as this woman wearing the alb during the “ceremony” is concerned, I am also appalled by it. Inasmuch as many of you say that it’s not a liturgical garment, if that is the case then why is the priest required to wear one? Why are EHMC’s recommended to wear one when exercising their duty? The woman is simply serving an administrative role. It is not a ministerial role. Such a ceremony should not even have happened. It only serves to confuse things even more and perhaps drive a wedge in the diocese.
 
I believe we have seventeen Pastoral Administrators, fourteen of whom are lay women or religious. Three are deacons.
 
I believe we have seventeen Pastoral Administrators, fourteen of whom are lay women or religious. Three are deacons.
Deacon,. did any of these lay administrators have a special Mass installing them into their positions? I think that is the major bone of contention here.
 
You might be thinking of parochial vicar, which many of the newly ordained priests in my diocese hold until they get enough experience to run a parish on their own.

Now, in my old Central Texas stomping ground we had such a thing as a Pastoral Associate for Administration. She was the one who managed the business and operational end of the parish. We also had a Pastoral Associate for Liturgy and a Pastoral Associate for Faith Formation. But, the priest was the pastor and he had associate pastors.

Now, when a priest transfers from one parish to another, he is Parish Administrator of his old one and pastor of his new one until his successor is appointed. That happened when my friend was transferred to the Cathedral. He was Administrator of his own parish and rector of the new one.

The same holds true for bishops. When we were part of the Diocese of Corpus Christi, our bishop had been named Archbishop of Puerto Rico. Now, he went and assumed that Metropolitan See, but, he was still Apostolic Administrator of our diocese until his successor was appointed. And, no, there wasn’t a lay person running the diocese. The buck still stopped with the Apostolic Administrator.

I am still very much disturbed with what happened in Thurifer’s diocese. In my opinion it does set a bad precedent. As far as this woman wearing the alb during the “ceremony” is concerned, I am also appalled by it. Inasmuch as many of you say that it’s not a liturgical garment, if that is the case then why is the priest required to wear one? Why are EHMC’s recommended to wear one when exercising their duty? The woman is simply serving an administrative role. It is not a ministerial role. Such a ceremony should not even have happened. It only serves to confuse things even more and perhaps drive a wedge in the diocese.
Read post #67.

I’m fairly sure “Parish Administrator” is a specific title within the Church – not that people necessarily treat it as such.
 
Deacon,. did any of these lay administrators have a special Mass installing them into their positions? I think that is the major bone of contention here.
Some of them have. Generally, if the PA asks for one, the bishop will come out and provide one.
 
Some of them have. Generally, if the PA asks for one, the bishop will come out and provide one.
I don’t mean to be combative, but, where is this ritual found in the Pontifical? I can certainly understand having one for a new Pastor, as he will concelebrate with the Bishop, but, somehow having one for a lay person doesn’t sit well with me. We have never had one in our diocese (although, in fairness, we are the baby of the Texas province).

Was this ritual somehow cobbled up and adapted for this purpose? Did someone somehow get an indult from the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments to do this? Now, don’t get me wrong. I am not totally against the idea of a lay person handling the business end of the parish, but, to have a ceremony for someone who is, in essence, the general manager of the place doesn’t seem fitting, especially if this person (male or female) is not clergy. It sends the wrong message and seems to give these folks a role and appearance that is contrary to what their original role is.
 
I don’t mean to be combative, but, where is this ritual found in the Pontifical? I can certainly understand having one for a new Pastor, as he will concelebrate with the Bishop, but, somehow having one for a lay person doesn’t sit well with me. We have never had one in our diocese (although, in fairness, we are the baby of the Texas province).

Was this ritual somehow cobbled up and adapted for this purpose? Did someone somehow get an indult from the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments to do this? Now, don’t get me wrong. I am not totally against the idea of a lay person handling the business end of the parish, but, to have a ceremony for someone who is, in essence, the general manager of the place doesn’t seem fitting, especially if this person (male or female) is not clergy. It sends the wrong message and seems to give these folks a role and appearance that is contrary to what their original role is.
I am not at work (off for Martin Luther King Day) so I can’t look it up, but they could have possible adapted something from the BOok of BLessings. I know we have a formal commissioning of EMHC at Mass, which is required by our bishop. We also have commissioning of catechists once a year. I do know a Pastoral Associate who was formally commissioned in her parish, but I wasn’t there so I cannot comment on what was done. It could have been a simple blessing but knowing her and her pastor at the time, it could have been something more.
 
I don’t mean to be combative, but, where is this ritual found in the Pontifical? I can certainly understand having one for a new Pastor, as he will concelebrate with the Bishop, but, somehow having one for a lay person doesn’t sit well with me. We have never had one in our diocese (although, in fairness, we are the baby of the Texas province).
I don’t know about the US but in Canada we have “Celebrations of Installation and Recognition” and although I don’t have the official edition in the office the Draft Copy contains a rite for Installation of Parish Administrator. The introduction says: " At times lay men, lay women, religious women or deacons are appointed by the Bishop to be responsible for the pastoral care of a particular parish with all the responsibilities that this includes. The installation is the celebration during which the PA is officially presented to and welcomed by those for whom he/she will have pastoral care."

So for us a PA doesn’t just do ‘business’ but Pastoral Care with all that that entails.

Then there is the “Rite of Recognition of Pastoral Assistant” but that one is for those who work hand in hand with the parish priest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top