Inter Mirifica, a missed opportunity, and still ignored. Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KEP1983
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
K

KEP1983

Guest
Hey all,

I was recently reading through Inter Mirifica, the document from Vatican II regarding the church and the media. The first half deals with the morality of the media, film, etc, and is pretty straightforward. The second half was of more interest, and seems to be very ignored still.

It basically says that the church should be involved in the media, film, drama, etc in order to evangelize the culture. Read this and see how the council really seemed to stress the media arts importance:

“The production and showing of films that have value as decent entertainment, humane culture or art, especially when they are designed for young people, ought to be encouraged and assured by every effective means. This can be done particularly by supporting and joining in projects and enterprises for the production and distribution of decent films…”

“In addition, there should be an effort to see that the noble and ancient art of the drama, which now is diffused everywhere by the media of social communication, serves the cultural and moral betterment of audiences.”

"It is quite unbecoming for the Church’s children idly to permit the message of salvation to be thwarted or impeded by the technical delays or expenses, however vast, which are encountered by the very nature of these media. Therefore, this sacred Synod advises them of the obligation they have to maintain and assist Catholic newspapers, periodicals and film projects, radio and television programs and stations, whose principal objective is to spread and defend the truth and foster Christian influence in human society. At the same time, the Synod earnestly invites those organizations and individuals who possess financial and technical ability to support these media freely and generously with their resources and their skills, inasmuch as they contribute to genuine culture and the apostolate.

Moreover, that the varied apostolates of the Church with respect to the media of social communication may be strengthened effectively, each year in every diocese of the world, by the determination of the Bishops, there should be celebrated a day on which the faithful are instructed in their responsibilities in this regard. They should be invited to pray and contribute funds for this cause. Such funds are to be expended exclusively on the promotion, maintenance and development of institutes and undertakings of the Church in this area, according to the needs of the whole Catholic world.

Since an effective apostolate on a national scale calls for unity of planning and resources, this sacred Synod decrees and orders that national offices for affairs of the press, films, radio and television be established everywhere and given every aid…"

So the church should be involved in the media, drama, and film to evangelize the culture. It should not be held back due to technical expenses, “however vast.” And the church should promote and assist.

I don’t see this being followed or discussed whatsoever. We have one or two catholic filmmakers out there, all of them had to be self funding. Only Mel Gibson has been able to do anything with a good budget and reach a lot of people. Few others even try, and of the ones that do, the church gives no assistance to, financial or otherwise.

This document seems to speak very strongly on the importance of this issue, yet it’s practically ignored. Why?
 
I have a good collection of Catholic DVD’s and invite friends and family over to see them.

The Catholicism series is one great set, and Bishop Robert Barron continues to produce excellent DVDs.

Ignatius Press sells many movies about saints, and DVDs that teach Church history and other religious topics.

I don’t see that we have a shortage of such excellent media.
 
I have a good collection of Catholic DVD’s and invite friends and family over to see them.

The Catholicism series is one great set, and Bishop Robert Barron continues to produce excellent DVDs.

Ignatius Press sells many movies about saints, and DVDs that teach Church history and other religious topics.

I don’t see that we have a shortage of such excellent media.
That’s all good, and I love fr robert Barron’s catholicism series. But this isn’t reaching out to the culture at large, which is what vatican 2 was supposed to be all about.

The church produced the greatest artists and literary figures in history. No one else even comes close. These people completely changed and guided culture with their art. Yet where are the great catholic culture shapers of today?

Things like EWTN are great, but we need more culture shaping art, just as the church used to evangelize the culture. People shape their worldview primarily through story and art, not through a subcultures didactic overt programming that they’re already predisposed to despise.
 
I think you bring up a great point! Yes, there have been many good privately-funded Catholic films and, of course, EWTN and Catholic radio. However, why not have the Church itself fund the arts to evangelize? The arts–music, architecture, drama, paintings, literature, etc.–have brought countless people to faith because the arts speak directly to the human heart.

How do we make this happen?
 
Perhaps if we take a step back and see who the great artist of eras gone by were and juxtapose them to our times we can get an answer to your question.

We see that the luminaries of yesteryears were LAITY. Yes the Church guided and prodded but in the end the genius is within the pews.

Perhaps we need to retake our GOD given right to make art (TV, radio, movies, etc) that gives proper glory to GOD and can be a magnet to the masses for the New Evangelization.

 
Perhaps if we take a step back and see who the great artist of eras gone by were and juxtapose them to our times we can get an answer to your question.

We see that the luminaries of yesteryears were LAITY. Yes the Church guided and prodded but in the end the genius is within the pews.

Perhaps we need to retake our GOD given right to make art (TV, radio, movies, etc) that gives proper glory to GOD and can be a magnet to the masses for the New Evangelization.

Yes, I agree that the vast majority of these great artists of the past were lay people. But the church still supported and promoted them.

I recall hearing about one of the larger Protestant films being funded by a small handful of congregations. (Was it fireproof, maybe?). The Protestants are trying to get involved in the media at large, and theyve been pretty successful so far. I remember when I was a protestant, I would hear the pastors talk regularly about supporting any sort of legit christian media.

And they have less resources than we do.

And quite frankly, protestants have never even come close to reaching the artistic quality of catholics. We’ve had one catholic filmmaker create a solid catholic film, and it took the world by storm, and he’s not even a saintly catholic either (Mel Gibson). A few others are trying, but not enough is getting done.

Frankly, looking at our history in the arts, we should be pumping out films the quality of “The Passion of the Christ” regularly. We should be blowing everyone else away.

When “Little Boy” came out a few months ago, how many parishes encouraged their parishioners to go see the movie? How many even discussed it? Very few, I’ll bet.

I don’t see why we’re largely ignoring inter mirifica and just sitting on the sidelines.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top