F
Faith1960
Guest
Do you put any stock in the study?I don’t put much stock int hat study for two reasons:
Do you put any stock in the study?I don’t put much stock int hat study for two reasons:
I’ve always heard the same thing – that God’s answers aren’t always “yes,” but can be “no” or “later,” BUT given the large number of patients in this study, I still can’t help but think that there’d be some indication of His intervention, among those who were prayed for. Am I wrong? And, if so, why?
- Scriptures tell us God answers prayers. Yes He Does. But the answers are not always Yes. The answer might be “no” or “later”. There is nothing in that study to account for answers other than “yes, I will heal you faster.” What if what is best for a person is for them to heal slower?
Um…uh…help, anyone?I’ve been searching and searching online for articles showing that the STEP study on intercessory prayer was flawed and I’m not finding much.Can anyone find some articles from credible sources that prove the study was flawed in some way?
Not only that, but God could simply be generous and grant healing to the control group at the same time that he grants it to the prayed for group. That would force one to conclude just what they concluded, namely, that you can’t tell the difference between the control group and an experimental group . . . which puts the whole thing in a different light . . .I would think that the study is flawed due to the fact one could never be sure that someone might be praying for those in the control group.![]()
Reading the source, it only indicates that the prayer group pray for the patients. But how about the patients themselves? It also never stated that the control group is atheist. There is always possibility that they pray as well. The blind experiment, turns out not to be as blind as they thought to be. By limiting their knowledge on the patients, the researcher also limited their knowledge on the important details related to the outcome of the study. To put it in scientific term, let’s look at quantum mechanic principles. It said, you can not measure two different (but related eg: time and position) things at the same time. The action of the observer always influence the outcome of the measurement. So it is what actually happens with the study.I don’t put much stock int hat study for two reasons:
God is not a robot servant that does what we command when we command it. All this study did is verify this fact.
- They have no way to show that either group was NOT prayed for. Many times people pray without being asked. there is no way to check with God and say “God, please let us know if anyone prays for that guy, we are doing a study here and don’t want them to!” Well, I guess you can ask God to do that, but most likly His answer would be “No.”
- Scriptures tell us God answers prayers. Yes He Does. But the answers are not always Yes. The answer might be “no” or “later”. There is nothing in that study to account for answers other than “yes, I will heal you faster.” What if what is best for a person is for them to heal slower?
What about what the author of this article has to say? It was written in 2010. I can’t find any studies or anything to prove the 2006 study was flawed.Others have expressed some very good points bout the difficulties in making a study of the effect of intercessory prayer. Frankly - while the scientific method CAN take into account many factors, there may be factors at work that science either does not know about, and therefore cannot allow for, or else science does not properly or fully understand all the factors.
This is not an indictment of the Scientific method, merely pointing out something that scientists themselves would agree can cause false readings or conclusions.
In the matter of intercessory prayer of any kind, I think that we need to look carefully at what Scripture tells us. Scripture says to “Ask and you will receive”, “if you have faith the size of a mustard seed you can move mountains”, “God will grant anything asked for in Jesus name, if we trust and do not doubt”, that those who follow Jesus “shall do the works” that he does and “even greater works”.
Nowhere does Jesus say that the answer will be “no”, or “not yet”. Rather he says ask and it will be given.
BUT -
All of these things - all of these promises are built upon faith, a true, full trusting, confident and courageous faith. That faith must be founded very deeply and profoundly on Christ. It must fulfill to the greatest measure possible the two great commandments of Love (Mt 22:36-40) and we must seek to be perfect as our heavenly Father is perfect. (Mt 5:48) It must show a willingness, not only to accept God’s will, but to seek to put God’s Will into practice in our lives…even at the expense of our own comfort and reputation among men.
These things are not easy. Indeed they are very hard - extremely hard. Yet this IS what is called for.
In fact, it is so hard that most (myself included at first) refuse to question our own faith and instead look “outside” ourselves for explanation. This is where we get a lot of the other explanations like “sometimes the answer is no” and so forth. Note here that I am not questioning anyone else’s faith…I am just saying that the natural tendency is to assume our faith is fine - so there must be another explanation…
Now - for those who DO pursue the type of faith and perfection called for in the Gospels, what is learned in that journey is the need to let go of our needs and desires. In so doing, we do not ask for much. If and when we DO ask for things, we ask first for grace, for God’s will, and only then do we ask for something specific. In other words, the closer we move toward God, the more “correct” are our requests to the Will of God.
Now - to tie all of this to the OP question and the study…Science has not and indeed cannot effectively measure the interior life of those praying. As such those making the study cannot know if those praying are properly disposed, properly aligned to God’s will, etc to be truly effective.
There is another thread on healing currently active where some of this is also explored - Here is the link…
Peace
James
I don’t see that the author of your linked article addresses any of the points I was making. Further, I don’t think we need to prove the 2006 study “flawed”. It simply tried to study something that cannot truly be studied by science.What about what the author of this article has to say? It was written in 2010. I can’t find any studies or anything to prove the 2006 study was flawed.
psychologytoday.com/blog/homo-consumericus/201003/does-god-answer-prayers
Well, yeah, it is making me doubt.I don’t see that the author of your linked article addresses any of the points I was making. Further, I don’t think we need to prove the 2006 study “flawed”. It simply tried to study something that cannot truly be studied by science.
Science requires things that can be isolated, quantified and are repeatable (more or less). That is fine for science. It allows us to have, for instance, a very fine surgeon who happens to be a jerk. His personality, his spiritual life, etc have zero effect on his skills…The skill required to perform delicate surgeries is completely isolated from the rest of who he is.
Faith and spirituality, the Christian Life, do not work that way. It calls for a total integration of ones self with God’s will. It is much more mystical than it is quantitative. As such science cannot isolate components and cannot quantify various factors with any level of scientific certainty. Thus, any attempt to do a statistical study is bound to produce the kinds of results seen…no significant statistical difference.
I hope that this is not something that is tempting you to doubt…
Peace
James
Well - you kind of have me there since understanding this can take a really long time…Well, yeah, it is making me doubt.
And I’ll risk looking really dumb here by saying that what you wrote above, <It calls for a total integration of ones self with God’s will. It is much more mystical than it is quantitative. As such science cannot isolate components and cannot quantify various factors with any level of scientific certainty. > is confusing to me. I don’t think I understand what you’re saying.![]()
From what the studies show, and even from what I think you’re saying, it appears to me that the patients outcomes would be the same, regardless of whether any of them were prayed for or not, which seems like chance rather than any kind of divine intervention.It is a submission of our will to God’s Will - A uniting of our will with His in Love for Love is the two great and basic commandments (Mt 22:36-40 and God IS Love (1 John 4:7-8)
Consider the ramifications of this unitive Love. If we conform our will to God’s, then we help but want what God wants. Thus our primary prayer is for His will to be done “…on earth as it is in heaven…” As far as other things go, we only desire that which will glorify God. Not riches, not personal fame, not even the health of another, if that is not God’s plan for that person.
If you would like a really good book on the subject, check my signature. It’s a book by Ralph Martin and is truly excellent, combining the teachings of some great doctors of the Church into a clear and easy to read and follow explanation.
Don’t have time to really get into this right now…I’ll try to look at it again tonight and respond…From what the studies show, and even from what I think you’re saying, it appears to me that the patients outcomes would be the same, regardless of whether any of them were prayed for or not, which seems like chance rather than any kind of divine intervention.![]()
OK - I’m back…From what the studies show, and even from what I think you’re saying, it appears to me that the patients outcomes would be the same, regardless of whether any of them were prayed for or not, which seems like chance rather than any kind of divine intervention.![]()
For the next 60 minutes, a team of doctors and nurses used over 4,000 chest compressions and gave him 13 electrical shocks but neither his heart nor lungs responded. After one hour and 10 minutes, the doctor was pronounced dead.
Ten minutes later, his wife arrived from Kalgoorlie and was told she go in and say goodbye.
Dr. George continued by saying, “Being a doctor herself, Sherry knew that medical science had proved that if the blood supply to the brain was cut off for over three minutes the brain would begin to die, and in 20 minutes the brain would be completely dead. But as she and I had trusted Jesus Christ as Almighty God and Savior, she decided to humbly ask Him to intervene.
“Holding my hand, she prayed, ‘Lord Jesus, he is only 39, I am only 38 and we have a ten year boy. I need a miracle.’
If you think about this scene, we can assume that at least twelve minutes passed between them sopping all attempts to revive him and his wife uttering her prayer. His coming back as certainly a miracle, but so is this from later in the story:“As soon as she said this it was as though someone had breathed life into me again and my heartbeat came back.”
“The doctor thought I would not survive, and even if I did, I would be completely brain dead on a ventilator. In Perth ICU, I had kidney and liver failure and was still in a deep coma.”
Three days later, on Sunday, after all the odds, the doctor opened his eyes. The next day, he was moving his hands and legs.
Not possible according to science. There are many people, certainly, who have been without heart/lung function, prayed for, and stayed dead. There are many brought back after less time than this man was without function, who do have the expected brain disfunction. Does that mean the wife’s prayer had nothing to do with his recovery?On Wednesday, he was fully conscious and off the ventilator, and his memory and brain were fully functional.