O
otjm
Guest
Christ did not promise to protect the EF; he promised to keep the Church against the gates of Hell. that has been taken for 2,000 years to protect doctrine and morals. the form of the Mass is disciplinary, and that can differ (as exemplified by the 20+ Eastern rites).
I would tend to believe the priest, not that the EF will fall out of existence, but that if it does not grow (and currentlly it appears at stasis), it is in danger of becomening nothing more than a museum piece. He is in the middle of it, I am not; and his warnings might be worth examining. Somewhere in the past couple of years there is a thread about it.
And you misread my statement; the John Paul 2 priests are very attached to Vatican 2; they are trying, as many bishops are now trying, to continue the proper implementation of it. there are 16 documents; Sacred Liturgy is only one of them. They simply do not have the battles the priest one or two generations before them had.
So, how much have the FSSP expanded? If they added one more parish, they have expanded, but that does not mean particularly anything on the scale of 17,200 parishes. In fact, according to the article, in 10 years they added 10 parishes (48 to 58) which is an increase of 1/1725 of all the parishes in the US. An average of 1 per year just about gets us to stasis, as there have been parishes which have closed the EF.
If you wish to continue this discussion, I would suggest that instead, you spend significant effort in getting others you know who do not attend the EF, to do so. As you note, others can look at facts, often through the proverbial rose colored glasses. their view of reality does not change the reality. There is a vast difference between something that is widely practiced, and something that is practiced widely.
I would tend to believe the priest, not that the EF will fall out of existence, but that if it does not grow (and currentlly it appears at stasis), it is in danger of becomening nothing more than a museum piece. He is in the middle of it, I am not; and his warnings might be worth examining. Somewhere in the past couple of years there is a thread about it.
And you misread my statement; the John Paul 2 priests are very attached to Vatican 2; they are trying, as many bishops are now trying, to continue the proper implementation of it. there are 16 documents; Sacred Liturgy is only one of them. They simply do not have the battles the priest one or two generations before them had.
So, how much have the FSSP expanded? If they added one more parish, they have expanded, but that does not mean particularly anything on the scale of 17,200 parishes. In fact, according to the article, in 10 years they added 10 parishes (48 to 58) which is an increase of 1/1725 of all the parishes in the US. An average of 1 per year just about gets us to stasis, as there have been parishes which have closed the EF.
If you wish to continue this discussion, I would suggest that instead, you spend significant effort in getting others you know who do not attend the EF, to do so. As you note, others can look at facts, often through the proverbial rose colored glasses. their view of reality does not change the reality. There is a vast difference between something that is widely practiced, and something that is practiced widely.