C
Christophorus
Guest
Recently I was attending Mass and heard a questionable intrepretation of this Sunday’s Gospel reading during the 3rd Sunday of Lent:
There once was a person who had a fig tree planted in his orchard, and when he came in search of fruit on it but found none, he said to the gardener, ‘For three years now I have come in search of fruit on this fig tree but have found none. So cut it down. Why should it exhaust the soil?’ He said to him in reply, ‘Sir, leave it for this year also, and I shall cultivate the ground around it and fertilize it; it may bear fruit in the future. If not you can cut it down.’”
Although I felt this to be a wonderful opportunity to offer catechesis on the need to avoid sin and bear fruit the Deacon offered an interpretation of this passage which I had a very difficult time accepting.
He said that the owner of the fig tree represents worldly men who seek to pass judgement on their peers and that the gardener was God asking to give the tree another year to bear fruit.
Is there any interpretations offer at your parishes which offered a more patristic view?
Thank you.
There once was a person who had a fig tree planted in his orchard, and when he came in search of fruit on it but found none, he said to the gardener, ‘For three years now I have come in search of fruit on this fig tree but have found none. So cut it down. Why should it exhaust the soil?’ He said to him in reply, ‘Sir, leave it for this year also, and I shall cultivate the ground around it and fertilize it; it may bear fruit in the future. If not you can cut it down.’”
Although I felt this to be a wonderful opportunity to offer catechesis on the need to avoid sin and bear fruit the Deacon offered an interpretation of this passage which I had a very difficult time accepting.
He said that the owner of the fig tree represents worldly men who seek to pass judgement on their peers and that the gardener was God asking to give the tree another year to bear fruit.
Is there any interpretations offer at your parishes which offered a more patristic view?
Thank you.