Intinction as a means to foster communion on the tongue?

[Ahlman]

Sorry for posting in the wrong forum, maybe some can move the thread to where it belongs?

Since the GIRM says that the communicant may receive “where this is allowed and if the communicant so chooses, in the hand” the decision to go to intinction exclusively removes that choice.

Not at all. Anyone who wants to receive in the hand could still stick out their hands, and receive an unintincted host. Now, if anyone for some reason would like to receive an unintincted host on the tongue, one could probably agree with the priest on a sign to indicate that.