J
japhy
Guest
This is purely speculative. I’m curious about the following from the GIRM:
287. If Communion from the chalice is carried out by intinction, each communicant, holding a communion-plate under the chin, approaches the priest, who holds a vessel with the sacred particles, a minister standing at his side and holding the chalice. The priest takes a host, dips it partly into the chalice and, showing it, says, Corpus et Sanguis Christi (The Body and Blood of Christ). The communicant responds, Amen, receives the Sacrament in the mouth from the priest, and then withdraws.
I checked the Latin, and sure enough, “holding” is the right translation of tenens. I really expected the English to be a mistranslation (I would think that each communicant would have a paten held under his or her chin, not that they would be holding the paten themselves).
Can anyone hazard a guess to why that is? Does anyone attend a parish where intinction is done? Does the communicant hold the paten or does another minister?
287. If Communion from the chalice is carried out by intinction, each communicant, holding a communion-plate under the chin, approaches the priest, who holds a vessel with the sacred particles, a minister standing at his side and holding the chalice. The priest takes a host, dips it partly into the chalice and, showing it, says, Corpus et Sanguis Christi (The Body and Blood of Christ). The communicant responds, Amen, receives the Sacrament in the mouth from the priest, and then withdraws.
I checked the Latin, and sure enough, “holding” is the right translation of tenens. I really expected the English to be a mistranslation (I would think that each communicant would have a paten held under his or her chin, not that they would be holding the paten themselves).
Can anyone hazard a guess to why that is? Does anyone attend a parish where intinction is done? Does the communicant hold the paten or does another minister?