C
cheezey
Guest
Hello… I’m a Protestant from New Mexico.
Check out my comments under “Most attacked/talked against religion on these Forums?”
Not nearly as informative or specific as yours, but I’d be curious…
thanks
Hello… I’m a Protestant from New Mexico.
Check out my comments under “Most attacked/talked against religion on these Forums?”
Not nearly as informative or specific as yours, but I’d be curious…
thanks
You have just answered your own questions here. Catholic belief and practice (including our social teachings, theology, and our liturgy are often called a “seamless garment”. Destroy one of these, and the others become pointless. That is why the Church does not change her dogmas to satisfy cultural whims. There have always been dissenters (even in the days of the Apostles, you will find if you read Scripture), and there probably always will be. The Church knows this. You ask why the church doesn’t tolerate political dissent, and yet you also ask why it doesn’t “excommunicate people left and right anymore”. The thing is, the Church does not excommunicate people lightly, which is why it is possible to feel that the church is both intolerant and yet too tolerant. That is to say, the Church is firm in its teachings, but moderate and merciful in its approach to those who do not follow them, which is why excommunication is reserved for very particular circumstances.
- But then again, if the Catholic church were to liberalize politically or tolerate political dissent, what would it then offer that I can’t find in a Protestant church??
Actually they don’t. Polls show most Catholics use contraception, and most Catholics voted for Obama. And I read Catholics on this forum admitting that most Catholics are poorly catechized.I can assure you that far more Catholics agree with the Magisterium than don’t
A common argument by Catholics, but how can Catholics claim 1.2 billion members when most of them don’t go to Mass, go to confession, have basic biblical knowledge, put too much devotion to Mary and the saints, or follow the teachings of the Vatican?But 1.2 billion Christians strong, unlike the “vibrant” protestant “community” of approx. 800 million people spread around 20,000 denominations, each following their own doctrine, and “more or less” doing what Christ told us to do in matters of faith and morals.
Some may be poorly Catechized, but you aren’t at all. We have one woman who had an abortion who is up for Beatification, right now. The Church is the place you go if you are a sinner. Gay people aren’t rejected or scorned in the Church, try reading the Catechism if you want to know what the Church says about homosexuality. The last gay woman I knew in the Church was the head of Catholic Education for the Archdiocese and the last gay man the highest paid music director.How would a Catholic parish welcome a woman who has had an abortion? How would a Catholic parish welcome someone who honestly believes he was born naturally gay?? How would a parish honestly be welcoming to these people if the Vatican politically opposes what they did in life??
How would a Catholic parish welcome a woman who has had an abortion? Or How SHOULD a Catholic parish welcome a woman who has had an abortion? How SHOULD a Catholic parish welcome someone who honestly believes he was born naturally gay?? How SHOULD a parish honestly be welcoming to these people if the Vatican politically opposes what they did in life??How would a Catholic parish welcome a woman who has had an abortion? How would a Catholic parish welcome someone who honestly believes he was born naturally gay?? How would a parish honestly be welcoming to these people if the Vatican politically opposes what they did in life??
This.How would a Catholic parish welcome a woman who has had an abortion? Or How SHOULD a Catholic parish welcome a woman who has had an abortion? How SHOULD a Catholic parish welcome someone who honestly believes he was born naturally gay?? How SHOULD a parish honestly be welcoming to these people if the Vatican politically opposes what they did in life??
Hopefully the woman who had an abortion regrets it and has asked for forgiveness.Who would give her this forgiveness? What better place to receive her forgiveness from Him but through the Church that began with Christ, who told us to Love; with love comes forgiveness. Hopefully, the “naturally” gay person, who genuinely loves another, not those who sin just to sin, would be welcomed also. The catechism suggests that we hate the act, not the person; that the persons are to be treated with the utmost respect as we should with all others.
Luke 6:37 Judge not: and you shall not be judged. Condemn not: and you shall not be condemned. Forgive: and you shall be forgiven. He did not condemn the woman at the well, the adulteress about to be stoned; and how many times are we to forgive? As often as it takes…
Good point, being Catholic has traditionally been unpopular in the red states with the exception of Louisiana, but has traditionally flourished in the blue states. For reference look at the KKK and its strongholds. Support for the KKK was not only given for its racist policies, but for being anti-Catholic and anti-semantic and nativist.to Burdensome1
“Being Catholic has always been unpopular to Americans.”
Yikes! Don’t get caught saying anything like that in Boston or New York.
A common argument by Catholics, but how can Catholics claim 1.2 billion members when most of them don’t go to Mass, go to confession, have basic biblical knowledge, put too much devotion to Mary and the saints, or follow the teachings of the Vatican?
To begin with, “most of them” is rather vague. Surely we are still more “vibrant” than any protestant community. Every Parrish you visit, certainly a percentage of faithful won’t be “practicing”, but that does not make the Catholic community less proactive in doing works of mercy and in spreading the good news. As for “too much devotion”, that’s absurd: the greater we grow in closeness to Christ, the more we ask His mother and His best friends to help us in our efforts - you know, a 2000-years old concept known as the Communion of Saints, that links us, the Church Militant, to them, the Church Triumphant, something that was common Christian doctrine until some heretic thought he’d just take that teaching off the table because he didn’t like it.
Speaking of Magisterium, isn’t the only reason why the Vatican politically opposes gay marriage rights, contraception, and abortion because of the Magisterium–simply because the pope and bishops say so?
The Magisterium is not just the pope and bishops. The Magisterium is the teaching authority that our Lord gave to His apostles. To them he said: “those who hear you hear me, those who reject you reject me”.
Eventually we’ve had heretics and schismatics who have decided - for very selfish reasons, by the way - to move away from the Church and reject the sacred tradition, coming up with their own interpretations and teachings, and forgetting that the very act of denying the sacred tradition established by virtue of apostolic succession was to reject the very Christ, who is head of the Church.
We can open new threads to discuss our opposition to homosexual unions (if you are Christian and have read the Scriptures, you’d know that there’s no such thing as a same-sex marriage right, and if you knew a bit about Church history you’d know that Holy Church, while condemning homosexual sex as immoral, has been commanding his faithful to love and respect homosexuals and avoid all discrimination towards them, all the while the secular world would persecute them to the extent of killing or chemically castrating homosexuals), contraception (again…in the scriptures) and abortion (that is, the murder of unborn children) to understnad the solid biblical foundation of our teachings, which the pope and bishops uphold…that’s all they do: with Paul, they tell us: “the tradition we have received is what we are passing to you…follow the tradition that is being passed in words and in writing”.
Sure, the secular world penetrated the Church and brought forth to some small number of faithful separating from it, and as a result we have so-called “Christian” communities who allow the removal of the unitive and procreavite purpose from the Sacrament of Matrimony, thus desecrating it and turning it into an act of sheer lust, and degradating the spouses from their dignity and turning them into each other’s pleasure tool…we have so-called “Christian” communities who allow the monstrosity of murdering unborn infants, which contributes to over 1.5 million abortions only in the US, of which only 1% are a result of sexual violence or rape…the rest being simply poor women - often unmarried for which maybe contraception went wrong and now can’t deal with the child…do you realize how many souls are 1.5 million per year? Do you think that this is Christ’s will, that Jesus is ok with that?
We can see, rather clearly after some study, Antichrist’s plan to destroy family in steps - namely, by introducing contraception, abortion, divorce, and euthanasia, and by ultimately undoing God’s established complementarity between man and woman by justifying all sorts of sexual behaviors, thus nullifying the divine design. We also find out throughout modern history how these intrinsic evils were promoted in the world by people and groups who had nothing to do with God - some of which, in fact, are dedicated to evil worship. It’s all there, and the only community that has upheld the ancient teachings and not faultered before the growth of evil has been the Catholic Church.
And there’s nothing about holy tradition that can clue us in as to how to vote politically.
I totally agree. Holy Church never told anyone: vote for X. What we do is we explain the matters of faith and morals, and explain that while no doubt any party will promote some intrinsic evil (I mean, they are not societies of apostolic life) some intrinsic evils are so grave that they bring upon the breakdown and destruction of society in the long run. People then make their choice. However, there is a lot in holy tradition about how to behave in our choices and towards authority. Just see how Peter and Paul behaved before the Sinhedrin. Paul treated a teacher very harshly, but greatly apologized when he found he was the high priest at the time. Peter, when commanded not to preach Christ, simply replied that he would not obey, because they obeyed to God and not to men. The Church thus educates us so that when we make our choices, especially voting, we are doing God’s will, and not promoting the works of Antichrist.
So many books today by Protestants, like “Unchristian” by David Kinnaman, write about how young people are turned off by the Church’s meddling with politics, its anti-gay and anti-woman image, its behind-the-times image, and its judgmental image.
**In my experience, young people are turned off by the modernism in the Church. They long for the traditional, for the reverence and devotion, for stricter and bolder preaching.
They long for shepherds who stand up and lead the way and are turned off by politically correct leaders who are afraid of scandalizing the world.
The Church, the great defender fo women, is accused to be “anti-women” by a world that has desecrated the woman and turned her into some sort of “I can be a man too” being who at the same time better look good enough and appear naked all over the place, be it adds, tv, cinema, for the pleasure of men who make lust a mark of true adulthood. Sorry, that’s not the way women want to look. Women have a greater dignity, and the Church is the only** institution that still keeps it. Just look how we revere the Blessed Virgin, who worked very hard and suffered a lot, and yet did not faulter in her pristine chastity, in her extraordinary charity, and in her motherly care.
As for “anti-gay”, I mentioned earlier on just how ahead of the game we’ve been, educating the secular world to respect and love anyone who has homosexual attractions, and teaching that such attraction is not evil or immoral in itself, all the while we’ve had and we still have states where you’ll be bullied in school if you’re gay and as an adult you may be persecuted, stoned, or hanged. We have many brothers and sisters who are homosexual and live wonderful lives in the Church, and they feel liberated from the oppression of lust and find themselves truly free to live life as God meant it to be lived: in true joy, filled with true love, which is agape love that is not geared or rooted in sexual pleasure. I admire them very much.
How would a Catholic parish welcome a woman who has had an abortion? How would a Catholic parish welcome someone who honestly believes he was born naturally gay?? How would a parish honestly be welcoming to these people if the Vatican politically opposes what they did in life??
We have wonderful groups in every Parrish that support women and men as well as couples who have undergone abortions. We treat them with great love and they need the Church to be on their side, just like God is on their side, because they realize the great mistake they made and they are most sorrowful. We help them to heal, and to move forward in life. We provide comfort. The world only knows how to pat them in the back and say: hey, it was a choice, you made the choice, it’s cool, don’t worry about it, take it easy. And the parents are left with that inner grief never goes away.
We also have wonderful pregnancy aid groups, and I’ve known of groups who have been contacted by poor families that were literally terrified of the idea of having a child and that, by living community life and talking to parents and receiving support, have brought to life wonderful children and now are so joyful, that I tell you: meeting with even one of them would make you give up all these arguments and understand the Church for what it is.
Like I said, there are groups for those who experience homosexual attractions, that provide them with support and understanding. Most homosexuals feel a heavy weight: the weight of being regarded as “different”. The world only knows one answer: yes, you are different. The Chuch of Christ, instead, embraces them as brothers and sisters in Christ, and tells them, nay, you are not different. You are a child of the Most High, like all of us, made in God’s image and likeness. Come, let us talk about chastity and about love, and try to understand together what you are experiencing. And great things happen. Because ultimately we all share the same cross, whether we are homosexual or heterosexual, and we all strive for chastity. Surely the “protestant” communities that don’t even know what the Holy Orders are could never understand why so many heterosexual and homosexual men enter religious or priestly consecrated life and chose never to marry and yet have wonderful lives. Surely the world cannot understand an individual who does not engage in extra-marital or pre-marital sexual relations with many partners. Surely the world discriminates these people as “not normal”. Holy Church doesn’t. We don’t discriminate anyone, because that is the will of Christ.
No it’s not vague. Statistics show that more people leave Catholicism in the US than enter it. Statistics show most Catholics contracept (a very alive topic on this forum). Statistics show Protestants are more likely than Catholics to vote against abortion and gay marriage rights (and ironically, Protestant churches tolerate political difference whereas the Vatican doesn’t!) Catholics concede that Protestant converts have a lot of Biblical knowledge, and some accuse Protestants of hijacking the Catholic Church (all topics discussed in this forum)!To begin with, “most of them” is rather vague. Surely we are still more “vibrant” than any protestant community. Every Parrish you visit, certainly a percentage of faithful won’t be “practicing”, but that does not make the Catholic community less proactive in doing works of mercy and in spreading the good news.
Luke 6:37 Judge not: and you shall not be judged. Condemn not: and you shall not be condemned. Forgive: and you shall be forgiven.
Exactly. So how does meddling into politics and opposing people’s secular civil rights fit in with not condemning them? How is this open arms, to say they don’t have the same civil rights as men to choose what to do with their own bodies, or that they don’t have the same rights as straight people to form committed, loving relationships?? Is this open arms? No, more like a message of hate.The Catholic church also believes that no matter how great our sin, we can always be forgiven. So how would the parish, the church, the Vatican welcome those who have sinned, but wish for forgiveness? With loving, opening arms.
Exactly. Boston and New York, taken over by secular progressives because the Catholic Church is moribund there.“Being Catholic has always been unpopular to Americans.”
Yikes! Don’t get caught saying anything like that in Boston or New York.
Regarding my statement that you quoted, I was actually referring to the very strong Irish Catholic influence in Boston and NY, especially Boston. But now that I think of it, maybe it isn’t as strong as I remember for NY…Where is the desire among lay Catholics for REVIVAL?
Exactly. Boston and New York, taken over by secular progressives because the Catholic Church is moribund there.
Jesus did not change truth just to “win” anybody. Truth is truth. Politics is tied in with Gospel preaching, because to teach truth is to preach the Gospel.Isn’t the answer of the Catholic Church simple–just to change the Magisterium with respect to social issues to win back the younger generation, who want religion that can connect with their era and their culture?
Isn’t Gospel preaching more important than politics??
How would a Catholic parish welcome a woman who has had an abortion? How would a Catholic parish welcome someone who honestly believes he was born naturally gay?? How would a parish honestly be welcoming to these people if the Vatican politically opposes what they did in life??
Because being progressive and “hip” is working for the liberal Protestants.Isn’t the answer of the Catholic Church simple–just to change the Magisterium with respect to social issues to win back the younger generation, who want religion that can connect with their era and their culture?