St Francis:
That’s a good question: how do *you *know that what *you *believe about Christ is true?
I know how it is that I know: I have faith in Christ and trust Him. I believe that He will keep His promises, and when He said that He would send the Holy Spirit to protect the Church from teaching error, I trust that He has, is, and will continue to do so.
I also believe that He is the fulfillment of the Law rather than establishing a new law.
Rather than subscribing to the Catholic system of Magisterium, Tradition, Confession, and devotion to saints, which has not saved a thing (by the way, the only person who can change anyone’s life is Jesus), I use my personal relationship with Jesus. He reveals things to me, and I double check with the Bible to know I’m not deceiving myself.
Like I said in post #287, couldn’t it be DANGEROUS to just subscribe to whatever a church says? Isn’t there individual responsiblity and accountability? So what if there are 30000 Protestant denominations, what’s so wrong with that? If a church does wrong, it is the
responsible thing to do to walk away and move on.
Isn’t a personal relationship with God (which Protestants emphasize) more important than the Catholic system?
St Francis:
where do you live, San Francisco? (Rhetorial question) You do realize that only about 2% of the US population is homosexual?
Only 2% of the US has openly come out as gay. But there are many, many more that haven’t come out. And many, many people have experimented with the same sex, though they may not consider themselves gay.
Sexuality is a continuum between partially gay and partially straight. Add to that bi, asexual, queer, and so on. Sexuality is not black and white; it’s complicated.
Christ tells all who are unmarried that they are not to engage in sexual activity; there is no “picking on” homosexuals.
As to anything else, the Church teaches that having homosexual inclinations is not a reason for any form of discrimination. So I am not sure what you are talking about here.
I don’t know what His interaction or lack thereof with Rome has to do with anything, but yes, I do believe that Christ would continue to teach that sexual activity is for *procreation, *not for pleasure. The pleasure is a gift from God to help two people for whom it is very important to stay together through think and thin (to raise children) to do so. Do you really think that God gave us the ability to work with Him in the creation of new human beings, and that Christ came and died on the cross to redeem hs from sin so that we could than go and do wahatever we like with this gift? How can you think about the suffering Christ went through and not feel compassion for Him? How can you not want to live *better *for Him?
But the very idea of denying gays the equal right to marry IS discrimination per se.
Overall it seems that you have a particular notion about Christ, and it seems this notion is that He is a lot like… well, you. And your friends. A nice guy who would surely never tell people that they can’t have what they want. A social libertarian who just wants everyone to have a good time.
So, on what evidence do you base this idea of Christ?
eddie too:
how can it be a loving act to tell people who fornicate that it will not impact their immortal soul and eternal destiny?
homosexual activity is definitely fornication since, according to Jesus, marriage is between one man and one woman.
how can it be ok to ignore and not oppose the murder of innocent people?
how can you find it Christ-like to advocate that such murders be permitted under the law?
afterall, abortion is the deliberately putting an end to an innocent life and that is the very definition of murder.
Because Jesus never did anything politically against Rome in the Bible. Because the Bible says NOTHING on point that we have to
politically oppose these things. There used to be laws against fornication and divorce. Why doesn’t the CC support them now? How about laws against pornography and prostitution? Should we continue to support the losing war on drugs?
When I see women suffering from pregnancies and bad marriages, it’s clear how foolish laws banning abortion and divorce would be. When I see my coworkers, just as bright and brilliant as anyone else, why would I advocate that they can’t have the same benefits and privileges of life? The gays have suffered enough.
We cannot legislate morality. All the time and effort Catholics spend politicking, they could instead spend it by preaching the Gospel. Getting people to convert. Because politics and laws don’t change human behavior; only belief in Jesus does. And if Magisterium and Tradition hinder belief in Jesus, we need an upgrade.
The Protestants have figured that out and that is why they flourish, and the CC shrinks. How is the divisiveness of politics a type of good spiritual fruit??
You guys keep talking about Catholic charities and hospitals run by the clergy, but where is the participation of Catholic laypeople in the Great Commission?
Isn’t the Great Commission for everyone?
I’m sorry if I mocked the Real Presence. But I wanted to point out that it’s the fruit of Galatians 5 that indicates Jesus’ presence, and not the Eucharist. We are judged by our fruit, right? Can we really delegate the Great Commission to just the clergy?
Kal2012 mentioned if I have an underlying issue. My only issue is that Christians will be relegated as an irrelevant hate group. My only issue is being persecuted by my gay coworkers for an unnecessary reason.
P.S. I’m male.