A
Then there would be a lot of priests going to jail. The priest shortage problem would get worse, but there wouldn’t be a problem with the confessional seal being broken.Indeed -however if it became law -how would a priest know he is not speaking to an undercover policeman for a setup?![]()
I agree. I think there will be a push to allowing only confession behind screens anyway. I know several priests (acquaintances, not close friends) that will only do confession behind the screen for their own safety.Well, as has been mentioned in the other four or five threads on this same story, the problem is easily addressed by having Confession only behind the screen, except in an emergency such as danger of death. This is already an option that priests can use and, if I were in Ireland, I would want to see it become the only option.
You can’t be jailed for not reporting an anonymous person.
Let them try. The canonical requirement is that the penitent has the right to an anonymous confession. If they outlaw the screen, priests can just hear confessions in the dark or with a blindfold on, or back-to-back. The latter is what they do at my kids’ school when they have multiple priests since they only have one screened confessional kneeler.Dumb law or not. It is readily apparant that those lobby groups that oppose Catholics would surely love to get it passed. I see no reason why the privacy screen could not be outlawed as well by the same said groups. Ultimately this all boils down to just another attack on the faith.
That is a good point. The law would only apply when the priest new who commited the offense. Perhaps a return to all anonymous confessions would solve the legal quandry, should it arise.Let them try. The canonical requirement is that the penitent has the right to an anonymous confession.