J
JohnDeereFan
Guest
Oh, OK. Then I guess calling you a jerk isn’t calling you a name.P.S. calling you a troll, is not calling you a name.
Oh, OK. Then I guess calling you a jerk isn’t calling you a name.P.S. calling you a troll, is not calling you a name.
can you tell me where and when the Church has said you are anathema? were you ever Catholic? anathema is formal excommunication for heresy and it only happens to people who were Catholics and then started openly preaching heresy.But evidently, you can be anathema for believing what we believe.
No, you can’t.But evidently, you can be anathema for believing what we believe.
Are you familiar with the Council of Trent?can you tell me where and when the Church has said you are anathema?
Yep.were you ever Catholic?
But the Catholic does teach that these things are heresy.anathema is formal excommunication for heresy and it only happens to people who were Catholics and then started openly preaching heresy.
Then it’s your word against the Council of Trent.No, you can’t.
I’m going to assume that you’re about to go ahead point out what I did to you that caused you to feel I was being a jerk, so that I can apologize, and that you’re not just calling me a jerk to be mean and to violate this forum’s Terms of Service…Oh, OK. Then I guess calling you a jerk isn’t calling you a name.
What’s the violation? It’s not name calling.I’m going to assume that you’re about to go ahead point out what I did to you that caused you to feel I was being a jerk, so that I can apologize, and that you’re not just calling me a jerk to be mean and to violate this forum’s Terms of Service…
Yes, and I knew exactly that’s where you were getting your information. Your misconceptions about Trent are nothing new, here. Anathemas pronounced there apply to Catholics. Not to non-Catholics. You can’t toss a non-Catholic out of the Church. He can preach whatever he wants to at his own place of worship, heresy or not.Are you familiar with the Council of Trent?
Ok, when you grow up, we will talk again.What’s the violation? It’s not name calling.
And your arrogance in just dismissing everything I say out of hand because I’m a Protestant is nothing new, either.Yes, and I knew exactly that’s where you were getting your information. Your misconceptions about Trent are nothing new, here.
The Council of Trent did not make that distinction. Either it’s wrong to believe those things or it’s not.Anathemas pronounced there apply to Catholics. Not to non-Catholics. You can’t toss a non-Catholic out of the Church. He can preach whatever he wants to at his own place of worship, heresy or not.
I should say the same to you.Ok, when you grow up, we will talk again.
yes and you’re misinterpreting it…Are you familiar with the Council of Trent?
I disagree. The Council of Trent does not make that distinction.yes and you’re misinterpreting it…
it’s not enough to be Catholic and then leave the Church to be formally excommunicated. You’re formally excommunicated if you’re like Martin Luther… if you come up with heresies and preach them and lead people astray with them, as a Catholic. Then, the Church tells you, you can’t receive Communion, and “excommunicates” you. That’s anathema.
Did the Church formally forbid you, personally, from receiving the Eucharist? or did you just leave on your own? if so, you’re not “anathema”.
Peace
JohnDeereFan responded:Originally posted by PRmerger
Let’s just say that it’s 15 denominations that exist because they’ve read Scripture and decided their doctrine differs from the original one.
To which I respond: so how many denominations will you accept is the correct number? I’ll work with you on whatever number you claim is true.Wrong, as usual.
Oh, but the problem isn’t whether people are devout, it’s whether people are educated. People can be led to believe that Catholicism is pagan, idolatrous, cultish, and what have you without knowing any better. This is why I insist that before missionaries try to convert Catholics, they first learn about the faith from Catholic sources.In response to ‘sheep stealing’, no one gets ‘stolen’ w/o their permission. If the Catholics are so devout then the fact that other missionaries come shouldnt’ be irritating. That goes for any church. You dont’ have church police of any denomination that I am aware of. I say let the missionaries talk to other members of other churches. If one’s testimony is strong then their testimonies will only get stronger as one testifies of their own beliefs. I don’t see missionaries as a threat. One should know what their church believes to be able to discuss civily w/missionaries of other denominations w/o bible bashing.