D
DiZent
Guest
Some of my co-workers (mostly protestants) were discussing a celebrity with a known addiction problem. The celebrity has been in an abusive marriage (husband also has a known addiction) After one stint in rehab, she was “saved”, but has suffered more than one relapse following her spiritual awakening. The question came up as to whether someone who is actively using drugs is still saved. Most of my co-workers couldn’t reconcile this, but insisted that she was saved, that it wasn’t actions that get you to heaven. I stated that this was true, but actions can get you to hell. Then my question was whether someone who accepted Jesus, but then acted in ways that were not God’s will such as using drugs, was still in a state of grace. Most of my co-workers were confused as to what I meant by a state of grace, but stated that she would still be in God’s grace because God’s grace is freely given. My next question was whether or not the celebrity was rejecting God’s grace by using drugs, and they stated yes, but that she was still “saved”. My premise then was that since the celebrity has an addiction, that because of her addiction, maybe the drug use was not done with free will and full consent, so the action may not totally separate her from God’s grace, but she would still need to repent. One co-worker took me aside and said “you study the Master, and they don’t understand”. This co-worker is a fellow Catholic, and recently I’ve heard a couple protestant co-workers try to evangelize him into their churches. I think he was the reason I got involved in the discussion.